Expiratory ventilation assistance versus pressure-controlled ventilation with ambient oxygen in a hemorrhagic trauma model: a prehospital rescue option?

IF 2.8 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Intensive Care Medicine Experimental Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1186/s40635-025-00742-y
Tomas Karlsson, Jenny Gustavsson, Katrin Wellfelt, Mattias Günther
{"title":"Expiratory ventilation assistance versus pressure-controlled ventilation with ambient oxygen in a hemorrhagic trauma model: a prehospital rescue option?","authors":"Tomas Karlsson, Jenny Gustavsson, Katrin Wellfelt, Mattias Günther","doi":"10.1186/s40635-025-00742-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prehospital airway management is critical for maintaining oxygenation after severe trauma hemorrhage. In cases of semi-obstructed airways, intubation with an endotracheal tube may fail, whereas a 14 French intubating catheter may provide an alternative for ventilation. Expiratory ventilation assistance (EVA) through such a catheter could serve as a prehospital rescue option, particularly when oxygen supply is limited. This study evaluates whether EVA with ambient air is sufficient to maintain oxygenation and compares its effectiveness with pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-three anesthetized swines (mean weight 58.3 kg, SD 4.6) were subjected to 32% blood volume hemorrhage and allocated to either EVA (n = 11) or PCV (n = 12). Historical data were used in the control group. Three phases were studied: 15 min without intervention (emulating initial prehospital care), 30 min of whole blood resuscitation, and 15 min post-resuscitation. Parameters including oxygen delivery (DO<sub>2</sub>), oxygen consumption (VO<sub>2</sub>), arterial saturation (SaO<sub>2</sub>), intratracheal pressures, and lactate levels were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EVA and PCV demonstrated similar effectiveness in maintaining indexed DO<sub>2</sub> (p = 0.114), VO<sub>2</sub> (p = 0.325), oxygen extraction rate (p = 0.841), and SaO<sub>2</sub> (p = 0.097). Intratracheal pressures were significantly lower with EVA (p < 0.0001). EVA maintained clinically sufficient oxygenation (PaO<sub>2</sub> > 8.6 kPa) but PaCO<sub>2</sub> levels increased compared with control. Lactate levels were significantly lower in the EVA group during resuscitation (3.1 mmol/L vs. 4.8 mmol/L, p = 0.032).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both EVA and PCV effectively maintained oxygen delivery and sufficient oxygenation after trauma hemorrhage and whole blood resuscitation. Lower intratracheal pressures and reduced lactate accumulation with EVA suggest it may be a viable prehospital rescue method, especially in scenarios with limited oxygen supply. Further investigation is warranted to optimize its application.</p>","PeriodicalId":13750,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","volume":"13 1","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11889277/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-025-00742-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prehospital airway management is critical for maintaining oxygenation after severe trauma hemorrhage. In cases of semi-obstructed airways, intubation with an endotracheal tube may fail, whereas a 14 French intubating catheter may provide an alternative for ventilation. Expiratory ventilation assistance (EVA) through such a catheter could serve as a prehospital rescue option, particularly when oxygen supply is limited. This study evaluates whether EVA with ambient air is sufficient to maintain oxygenation and compares its effectiveness with pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV).

Methods: Twenty-three anesthetized swines (mean weight 58.3 kg, SD 4.6) were subjected to 32% blood volume hemorrhage and allocated to either EVA (n = 11) or PCV (n = 12). Historical data were used in the control group. Three phases were studied: 15 min without intervention (emulating initial prehospital care), 30 min of whole blood resuscitation, and 15 min post-resuscitation. Parameters including oxygen delivery (DO2), oxygen consumption (VO2), arterial saturation (SaO2), intratracheal pressures, and lactate levels were measured.

Results: EVA and PCV demonstrated similar effectiveness in maintaining indexed DO2 (p = 0.114), VO2 (p = 0.325), oxygen extraction rate (p = 0.841), and SaO2 (p = 0.097). Intratracheal pressures were significantly lower with EVA (p < 0.0001). EVA maintained clinically sufficient oxygenation (PaO2 > 8.6 kPa) but PaCO2 levels increased compared with control. Lactate levels were significantly lower in the EVA group during resuscitation (3.1 mmol/L vs. 4.8 mmol/L, p = 0.032).

Conclusion: Both EVA and PCV effectively maintained oxygen delivery and sufficient oxygenation after trauma hemorrhage and whole blood resuscitation. Lower intratracheal pressures and reduced lactate accumulation with EVA suggest it may be a viable prehospital rescue method, especially in scenarios with limited oxygen supply. Further investigation is warranted to optimize its application.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在出血性创伤模型中呼气通气辅助与环境氧压控通气:院前急救选择?
背景:院前气道管理是维持严重创伤出血后氧合的关键。在气道半阻塞的情况下,气管内插管可能会失败,而14法氏插管可能提供另一种通气方法。通过这种导管进行呼气通气辅助(EVA)可作为院前急救选择,特别是在氧气供应有限的情况下。本研究评估EVA与环境空气是否足以维持氧合,并比较其与压力控制通气(PCV)的有效性。方法:23头麻醉猪(平均体重58.3 kg, SD 4.6),出血量为32%,分为EVA组(n = 11)和PCV组(n = 12)。对照组采用历史数据。研究了三个阶段:15分钟不干预(模拟最初的院前护理),30分钟全血复苏和15分钟复苏后。测量氧输送(DO2)、耗氧量(VO2)、动脉饱和度(SaO2)、气管内压和乳酸水平等参数。结果:EVA和PCV在维持指数DO2 (p = 0.114)、VO2 (p = 0.325)、氧气提取率(p = 0.841)和SaO2 (p = 0.097)方面具有相似的效果。与对照组相比,EVA组气管内压力明显降低(p 2 bb0 8.6 kPa),但PaCO2水平升高。复苏时EVA组乳酸水平显著降低(3.1 mmol/L vs. 4.8 mmol/L, p = 0.032)。结论:EVA和PCV均能有效维持创伤出血及全血复苏后的供氧和充氧。较低的气管内压力和减少乳酸积累表明EVA可能是一种可行的院前抢救方法,特别是在氧气供应有限的情况下。值得进一步研究以优化其应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Physiological dissociation between ventilatory ratio and ventilatory efficiency in patients with ARDS. Prediction-guided clustering for sepsis phenotyping: a retrospective cohort analysis. The impact of metabolic syndrome on regional ventilation and perfusion in ARDS: an observational cohort study using electrical impedance tomography. Clinical practice in using corticosteroids and adjunctive sepsis therapies at the bedside among European ICUs: an ESICM-endorsed survey. Endotoxemia and its association with immune and coagulopathy responses in severe community-acquired pneumonia and COVID-19.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1