Early-stage investigators' experiences with an National Institutes of Health Pilot Award Program.

IF 2 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2025-01-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cts.2025.2
Cyleste C Collins, Jacqueline Dolata, Elodie Nonguierma, Mona Shediac-Rizkallah, Ashwini R Sehgal, J Daryl Thornton
{"title":"Early-stage investigators' experiences with an National Institutes of Health Pilot Award Program.","authors":"Cyleste C Collins, Jacqueline Dolata, Elodie Nonguierma, Mona Shediac-Rizkallah, Ashwini R Sehgal, J Daryl Thornton","doi":"10.1017/cts.2025.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Academic-community research partnerships focusing on addressing the social determinants of health and reducing health disparities have grown substantially in the last three decades. Early-stage investigators (ESIs), however, are less likely to receive grant funding from organizations like the National Institutes of Health, and we know little about the facilitators and barriers they face on their career journeys or the best ways to support them and their community research partnerships. This study examines ESIs' experiences with a program that funded and supported their community-partnered pilot health disparities research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fourteen ESIs from five cohorts of pilot investigators participated in in-depth focus groups between April 2020 and February 2024. Two reviewers independently identified significant quotes and created codes. Thematic analysis was used to develop relevant themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overarching theme was that the program was a launch pad for the ESIs' research careers. Four distinct sub-themes contributing to the launch pad theme were: (1) ESI Growth & Adaptation; (2) Community and Support; (3) The Value of Collaboration and Partnership; (4) Need for Effective Mentorship. The results suggest the program offered ESIs and community partners substantial, unique support and resources, but challenges remained.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Future programs helping ESIs who conduct community-engaged research to launch their research careers should consider implementing tailored support while offering strategies to eliminate or reduce institutional barriers, including strengthening mentoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"9 1","pages":"e29"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11883560/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2025.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Academic-community research partnerships focusing on addressing the social determinants of health and reducing health disparities have grown substantially in the last three decades. Early-stage investigators (ESIs), however, are less likely to receive grant funding from organizations like the National Institutes of Health, and we know little about the facilitators and barriers they face on their career journeys or the best ways to support them and their community research partnerships. This study examines ESIs' experiences with a program that funded and supported their community-partnered pilot health disparities research.

Methods: Fourteen ESIs from five cohorts of pilot investigators participated in in-depth focus groups between April 2020 and February 2024. Two reviewers independently identified significant quotes and created codes. Thematic analysis was used to develop relevant themes.

Results: The overarching theme was that the program was a launch pad for the ESIs' research careers. Four distinct sub-themes contributing to the launch pad theme were: (1) ESI Growth & Adaptation; (2) Community and Support; (3) The Value of Collaboration and Partnership; (4) Need for Effective Mentorship. The results suggest the program offered ESIs and community partners substantial, unique support and resources, but challenges remained.

Conclusions: Future programs helping ESIs who conduct community-engaged research to launch their research careers should consider implementing tailored support while offering strategies to eliminate or reduce institutional barriers, including strengthening mentoring.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期研究人员与国家卫生研究院试点奖励计划的经验。
背景:在过去三十年中,侧重于解决健康的社会决定因素和减少健康差距的学术界研究伙伴关系已经大大增加。然而,早期研究人员(ESIs)不太可能从美国国立卫生研究院(National Institutes of Health)等组织获得资助,我们对他们在职业生涯中面临的促进因素和障碍知之甚少,也不知道支持他们及其社区研究伙伴关系的最佳方式。本研究考察了ei在资助和支持他们的社区合作试点健康差异研究项目中的经验。方法:2020年4月至2024年2月,来自5个试点调查队列的14名研究人员参与了深度焦点小组。两名审稿人独立地确定了重要的引用并创建了代码。专题分析用于发展相关主题。结果:最重要的主题是,该计划是一个发射台,为学生的研究事业。为发射台主题做出贡献的四个不同的子主题是:(1)ESI增长与适应;(2)社区和支持;(3)协作与伙伴关系的价值;(4)需要有效的指导。结果表明,该项目为学校和社区合作伙伴提供了大量独特的支持和资源,但挑战依然存在。结论:未来的项目应该考虑实施量身定制的支持,同时提供消除或减少制度障碍的策略,包括加强指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
An open-source application for self-service, Health Insurance and Portability Accountability Act-compliant geocoding. Introduction to the JCTS special issue on advancing understanding and use of impact measures in implementation science. Erratum: Development of clinical research networks in rural America: Our experience from the Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines-1 trial - CORRIGENDUM. Ten years of Central IRB review for an NIH-funded large clinical trial network by an academic IRB: The NIH StrokeNet experience. A method to enable clinical and translational research teams with custom real-world data from electronic health record systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1