Tina Rödig, Mai-Thanh Vu, Philipp Kanzow, Franziska Haupt
{"title":"Long-term survival of endodontically treated teeth: A retrospective analysis of predictive factors at a German dental school.","authors":"Tina Rödig, Mai-Thanh Vu, Philipp Kanzow, Franziska Haupt","doi":"10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aims were to investigate the survival rate of endodontically treated teeth (ETT) at a German dental school and to identify potential prognostic factors influencing tooth survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Dental records of patients were retrospectively screened for nonsurgical root canal treatment of at least one permanent tooth between 2000 and 2015. Individual-, tooth-, and treatment-related variables were recorded, and survival was defined as the presence of the ETT in the oral cavity until the date of censoring. Survival rates of ETT were assessed by Kaplan-Meier statistics, and mean annual failure rates (mAFRs) after 5- and 10-years were calculated. The effect of the assessed variables on survival was determined by univariable log-rank test and multivariable Cox regression analysis with shared frailty (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 3,049 teeth from patients with a mean age of 41.53 ± 15.75 years were included. Survival of ETT after 5 and 10 years amounted to 88.0% and 77.4% (mAFR: 2.51% and 2.54%), respectively. The following variables significantly increased the tooth survival rate: patient age ≤ 60 years (p≤0.035), 2 proximal contacts (p<0.001), absence of apical periodontitis (p<0.001), multiple visits (p=0.033), use of a chelator (p=0.022), and placement of a new indirect restoration (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Root canal treatment is effective for maintaining natural teeth. Tooth survival was affected by several individual-, tooth-, and treatment-related variables.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>This retrospective study confirms the long-term retention of root-filled teeth after nonsurgical (re-)treatment. Several pre-, intra- and postoperative factors significantly reduced survival rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":15585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"105662"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105662","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The aims were to investigate the survival rate of endodontically treated teeth (ETT) at a German dental school and to identify potential prognostic factors influencing tooth survival.
Methods: Dental records of patients were retrospectively screened for nonsurgical root canal treatment of at least one permanent tooth between 2000 and 2015. Individual-, tooth-, and treatment-related variables were recorded, and survival was defined as the presence of the ETT in the oral cavity until the date of censoring. Survival rates of ETT were assessed by Kaplan-Meier statistics, and mean annual failure rates (mAFRs) after 5- and 10-years were calculated. The effect of the assessed variables on survival was determined by univariable log-rank test and multivariable Cox regression analysis with shared frailty (p<0.05).
Results: Overall, 3,049 teeth from patients with a mean age of 41.53 ± 15.75 years were included. Survival of ETT after 5 and 10 years amounted to 88.0% and 77.4% (mAFR: 2.51% and 2.54%), respectively. The following variables significantly increased the tooth survival rate: patient age ≤ 60 years (p≤0.035), 2 proximal contacts (p<0.001), absence of apical periodontitis (p<0.001), multiple visits (p=0.033), use of a chelator (p=0.022), and placement of a new indirect restoration (p<0.001).
Conclusion: Root canal treatment is effective for maintaining natural teeth. Tooth survival was affected by several individual-, tooth-, and treatment-related variables.
Clinical significance: This retrospective study confirms the long-term retention of root-filled teeth after nonsurgical (re-)treatment. Several pre-, intra- and postoperative factors significantly reduced survival rates.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Dentistry has an open access mirror journal The Journal of Dentistry: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The Journal of Dentistry is the leading international dental journal within the field of Restorative Dentistry. Placing an emphasis on publishing novel and high-quality research papers, the Journal aims to influence the practice of dentistry at clinician, research, industry and policy-maker level on an international basis.
Topics covered include the management of dental disease, periodontology, endodontology, operative dentistry, fixed and removable prosthodontics, dental biomaterials science, long-term clinical trials including epidemiology and oral health, technology transfer of new scientific instrumentation or procedures, as well as clinically relevant oral biology and translational research.
The Journal of Dentistry will publish original scientific research papers including short communications. It is also interested in publishing review articles and leaders in themed areas which will be linked to new scientific research. Conference proceedings are also welcome and expressions of interest should be communicated to the Editor.