Limitations of neutralizing antibody titers in COVID-19 vaccine efficacy trials and a call for additional correlates of protection.

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1080/21645515.2025.2473795
Young Hoon Hwang, Dal-Hee Min, Wan Beom Park
{"title":"Limitations of neutralizing antibody titers in COVID-19 vaccine efficacy trials and a call for additional correlates of protection.","authors":"Young Hoon Hwang, Dal-Hee Min, Wan Beom Park","doi":"10.1080/21645515.2025.2473795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic accelerated development of various vaccine platforms. Among them, mRNA vaccines played a crucial role in controlling the pandemic due to their swift development and efficacy against virus variants. Despite the success of these vaccines, recent studies highlight challenges in evaluating vaccine efficacy, especially in individuals with prior COVID-19 infection. Weakened neutralizing antibody responses after additional doses are observed in these populations, raising concerns about using neutralizing antibody titers as the sole immune correlate of protection. While neutralizing antibodies remain the primary endpoint in immunogenicity trials, they may not fully capture the immune response in populations with widespread prior infection or vaccination. This review explores reduced neutralizing antibody responses in previously infected individuals, and their impact on vaccine efficacy evaluation. It also offers recommendations for improving efficacy assessment, stressing incorporation of additional immune markers such as cell-mediated immunity to enable more comprehensive understanding of vaccine-induced immunity.</p>","PeriodicalId":49067,"journal":{"name":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","volume":"21 1","pages":"2473795"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11901426/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2025.2473795","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic accelerated development of various vaccine platforms. Among them, mRNA vaccines played a crucial role in controlling the pandemic due to their swift development and efficacy against virus variants. Despite the success of these vaccines, recent studies highlight challenges in evaluating vaccine efficacy, especially in individuals with prior COVID-19 infection. Weakened neutralizing antibody responses after additional doses are observed in these populations, raising concerns about using neutralizing antibody titers as the sole immune correlate of protection. While neutralizing antibodies remain the primary endpoint in immunogenicity trials, they may not fully capture the immune response in populations with widespread prior infection or vaccination. This review explores reduced neutralizing antibody responses in previously infected individuals, and their impact on vaccine efficacy evaluation. It also offers recommendations for improving efficacy assessment, stressing incorporation of additional immune markers such as cell-mediated immunity to enable more comprehensive understanding of vaccine-induced immunity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中和抗体滴度在COVID-19疫苗功效试验中的局限性以及对其他相关保护的呼吁
冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行加速了各种疫苗平台的开发。其中,mRNA疫苗由于其快速发展和对病毒变异的有效性,在控制大流行中发挥了至关重要的作用。尽管这些疫苗取得了成功,但最近的研究强调了评估疫苗效力方面的挑战,特别是在既往感染过COVID-19的个体中。在这些人群中观察到,在额外剂量后,中和抗体反应减弱,这引起了人们对使用中和抗体滴度作为唯一免疫保护相关因素的关注。虽然中和抗体仍然是免疫原性试验的主要终点,但它们可能无法完全捕获先前广泛感染或接种疫苗的人群的免疫反应。这篇综述探讨了先前感染个体中减少的中和抗体反应,以及它们对疫苗功效评估的影响。它还提出了改进疗效评估的建议,强调纳入额外的免疫标记,如细胞介导的免疫,以便更全面地了解疫苗诱导的免疫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-IMMUNOLOGY
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
489
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: (formerly Human Vaccines; issn 1554-8619) Vaccine research and development is extending its reach beyond the prevention of bacterial or viral diseases. There are experimental vaccines for immunotherapeutic purposes and for applications outside of infectious diseases, in diverse fields such as cancer, autoimmunity, allergy, Alzheimer’s and addiction. Many of these vaccines and immunotherapeutics should become available in the next two decades, with consequent benefit for human health. Continued advancement in this field will benefit from a forum that can (A) help to promote interest by keeping investigators updated, and (B) enable an exchange of ideas regarding the latest progress in the many topics pertaining to vaccines and immunotherapeutics. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics provides such a forum. It is published monthly in a format that is accessible to a wide international audience in the academic, industrial and public sectors.
期刊最新文献
Changes in 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination rate and associated factors in 2022 and 2024 among community-based older adults in Shanghai, China. Effects of message framing on HPV Vaccination decision-making: A Survey experiment among Chinese male college students. Epidemiological characteristics of rotavirus gastroenteritis in China: A systematic review of studies published from 2014 to 2023. Immunogenicity and safety of 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in pneumococcal vaccine-naive adults ≥18 years of age in India: A phase 3 single-arm trial. Satisfaction with immunization services and factors associated with satisfaction among guardians of 0-6-year-old children in China: A cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1