Teaching Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) in medical education: a scoping review.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY European Geriatric Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1007/s41999-025-01157-4
Regina Roller-Wirnsberger, Carolin Herzog, Sonja Lindner-Rabl, Mathias Schlögl, Maddalena Illario, Maria Cristina Polidori, Katrin Singler
{"title":"Teaching Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) in medical education: a scoping review.","authors":"Regina Roller-Wirnsberger, Carolin Herzog, Sonja Lindner-Rabl, Mathias Schlögl, Maddalena Illario, Maria Cristina Polidori, Katrin Singler","doi":"10.1007/s41999-025-01157-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To gather and summarize evidence on educational and training formats for medical doctors in performing Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) in under- and postgraduate medical education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature review was conducted using the databases Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane and Embase to identify educational intervention studies and cohort studies related to CGA education and training for medical professionals. Additional references were incorporated through reference tracking. Studies included were then grouped according to competence level addressed during CGA trainings to create a current competence-based framework on educational tools to teach CGA to medical students and doctors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty eligible studies were identified, with 42 addressing the full implementation of CGA and 18 focusing on specific CGA domains. High variability in duration, intervention design and evaluation methods was consistently observed across the included studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings underscore the need for further coordinated research in CGA education and training to consolidate evidence and pave the way to more innovative, high-quality healthcare systems capable of addressing the complexities of an aging society.</p>","PeriodicalId":49287,"journal":{"name":"European Geriatric Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"425-433"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12014708/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Geriatric Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-025-01157-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To gather and summarize evidence on educational and training formats for medical doctors in performing Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) in under- and postgraduate medical education.

Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using the databases Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane and Embase to identify educational intervention studies and cohort studies related to CGA education and training for medical professionals. Additional references were incorporated through reference tracking. Studies included were then grouped according to competence level addressed during CGA trainings to create a current competence-based framework on educational tools to teach CGA to medical students and doctors.

Results: Sixty eligible studies were identified, with 42 addressing the full implementation of CGA and 18 focusing on specific CGA domains. High variability in duration, intervention design and evaluation methods was consistently observed across the included studies.

Conclusion: The findings underscore the need for further coordinated research in CGA education and training to consolidate evidence and pave the way to more innovative, high-quality healthcare systems capable of addressing the complexities of an aging society.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学教育教学中的老年综合评估(CGA):范围综述。
目的:收集和总结医学博士在初级和研究生医学教育中实施综合老年病学评估(CGA)的教育和培训形式的证据。方法:采用Medline、CINAHL、Cochrane和Embase数据库进行综合文献综述,筛选与医学专业人员CGA教育培训相关的教育干预研究和队列研究。通过参考文献跟踪纳入了其他参考文献。然后根据CGA培训期间涉及的能力水平对所纳入的研究进行分组,以创建当前基于能力的教育工具框架,向医科学生和医生教授CGA。结果:确定了60项符合条件的研究,其中42项涉及CGA的全面实施,18项侧重于特定的CGA领域。在纳入的研究中一致观察到持续时间、干预设计和评估方法的高度可变性。结论:研究结果强调需要进一步协调CGA教育和培训的研究,以巩固证据,并为更多创新,高质量的医疗保健系统铺平道路,能够解决老龄化社会的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Geriatric Medicine
European Geriatric Medicine GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Geriatric Medicine is the official journal of the European Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS). Launched in 2010, this journal aims to publish the highest quality material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of Geriatric Medicine. The EUGMS is interested in the promotion of Geriatric Medicine in any setting (acute or subacute care, rehabilitation, nursing homes, primary care, fall clinics, ambulatory assessment, dementia clinics..), and also in functionality in old age, comprehensive geriatric assessment, geriatric syndromes, geriatric education, old age psychiatry, models of geriatric care in health services, and quality assurance.
期刊最新文献
Age and neutrophil counts at the time of diagnosis of polymyalgia rheumatica: are they useful or confounding factors in the geriatrician's clinical practice? A three-biomarker panel for frailty prediction and risk stratification in institutionalized older adults: a multicenter validation study. Muscle loss must be interpreted in the context of fluid imbalance: a dual-parameter model predicts functional outcomes after acute stroke. Fall risk assessment using the World Guidelines for Falls Prevention Algorithm: Evidence from the ELSI-Brazil study. Perceived educational needs in geriatric medicine of professionals: a multinational multilingual open online survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1