Leading evidence-based practice: nurse managers' strategies for knowledge utilisation in acute care settings.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING BMC Nursing Pub Date : 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1186/s12912-025-02912-5
Jude Ominyi, Aaron Nwedu, David Agom, Ukpai Eze
{"title":"Leading evidence-based practice: nurse managers' strategies for knowledge utilisation in acute care settings.","authors":"Jude Ominyi, Aaron Nwedu, David Agom, Ukpai Eze","doi":"10.1186/s12912-025-02912-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP) in nursing is essential for improving patient care outcomes, yet systemic barriers, leadership challenges, and resource limitations continue to hinder its integration into clinical practice. Nurse managers (NMs) play a crucial role in bridging the gap between policy directives and frontline implementation, yet the dynamic interplay between leadership strategies, knowledge utilisation, and organisational barriers remains underexplored, particularly in resource-constrained settings. This study examines how NMs navigate these challenges to sustain EBP adoption in acute care environments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This collective case study employed a longitudinal qualitative design across two acute care settings in the UK. Data were collected over eight months through semi-structured interviews with NMs, nonparticipant observations, and document analysis of clinical guidelines and internal reports. A thematic analysis approach was used to synthesise findings and provide a nuanced understanding of leadership strategies and systemic factors influencing EBP adoption.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Six interconnected themes emerged: (1) Adaptive leadership strategies, where NMs employ a hybrid of directive and collaborative leadership approaches to drive EBP; (2) Overcoming organisational and resource barriers, including staff shortages, financial constraints, and competing priorities; (3) Knowledge utilisation and learning networks, highlighting the role of informal mentorship, structured CPD, and peer learning in sustaining EBP; (4) Digital transformation and EBP, examining the benefits and challenges of integrating digital tools and addressing IT literacy gaps; (5) Patient-centred adaptations, exploring how NMs balance evidence-based interventions with patient preferences and cultural considerations; and (6) Emotional and psychological support, underscoring the importance of managing staff resistance and mitigating change fatigue.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings of this study emphasise the pivotal role of NMs in driving EBP implementation through adaptive leadership, strategic resource management, and fostering learning networks. Addressing organisational barriers requires multi-level interventions that integrate leadership actions with systemic enablers to promote sustainable, evidence-informed nursing practice. Findings provide critical insights for healthcare policymakers, hospital administrators, and educators in enhancing EBP uptake within resource-limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"252"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11884053/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-02912-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP) in nursing is essential for improving patient care outcomes, yet systemic barriers, leadership challenges, and resource limitations continue to hinder its integration into clinical practice. Nurse managers (NMs) play a crucial role in bridging the gap between policy directives and frontline implementation, yet the dynamic interplay between leadership strategies, knowledge utilisation, and organisational barriers remains underexplored, particularly in resource-constrained settings. This study examines how NMs navigate these challenges to sustain EBP adoption in acute care environments.

Methods: This collective case study employed a longitudinal qualitative design across two acute care settings in the UK. Data were collected over eight months through semi-structured interviews with NMs, nonparticipant observations, and document analysis of clinical guidelines and internal reports. A thematic analysis approach was used to synthesise findings and provide a nuanced understanding of leadership strategies and systemic factors influencing EBP adoption.

Findings: Six interconnected themes emerged: (1) Adaptive leadership strategies, where NMs employ a hybrid of directive and collaborative leadership approaches to drive EBP; (2) Overcoming organisational and resource barriers, including staff shortages, financial constraints, and competing priorities; (3) Knowledge utilisation and learning networks, highlighting the role of informal mentorship, structured CPD, and peer learning in sustaining EBP; (4) Digital transformation and EBP, examining the benefits and challenges of integrating digital tools and addressing IT literacy gaps; (5) Patient-centred adaptations, exploring how NMs balance evidence-based interventions with patient preferences and cultural considerations; and (6) Emotional and psychological support, underscoring the importance of managing staff resistance and mitigating change fatigue.

Conclusion: Findings of this study emphasise the pivotal role of NMs in driving EBP implementation through adaptive leadership, strategic resource management, and fostering learning networks. Addressing organisational barriers requires multi-level interventions that integrate leadership actions with systemic enablers to promote sustainable, evidence-informed nursing practice. Findings provide critical insights for healthcare policymakers, hospital administrators, and educators in enhancing EBP uptake within resource-limited settings.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
领先的循证实践:护士管理者的战略知识利用在急性护理设置。
背景:在护理中实施循证实践(EBP)对于改善患者护理结果至关重要,但系统障碍、领导挑战和资源限制继续阻碍其融入临床实践。护士管理者(NMs)在弥合政策指令和一线实施之间的差距方面发挥着至关重要的作用,然而,领导战略、知识利用和组织障碍之间的动态相互作用仍未得到充分探讨,特别是在资源受限的环境中。本研究探讨了护士如何应对这些挑战,以在急症护理环境中维持EBP的采用。方法:这个集体案例研究采用纵向定性设计跨越两个急性护理设置在英国。通过与NMs的半结构化访谈、非参与性观察以及临床指南和内部报告的文件分析,收集了超过8个月的数据。主题分析方法用于综合研究结果,并对影响EBP采用的领导策略和系统因素提供细致入微的理解。研究发现:出现了6个相互关联的主题:(1)适应性领导策略,即管理者采用指令式和协作式领导的混合方法来推动EBP;(2)克服组织和资源障碍,包括人员短缺、财政限制和竞争优先事项;(3)知识利用和学习网络,强调非正式指导、结构化持续专业进修和同伴学习在维持EBP中的作用;(4)数字化转型和EBP,研究整合数字工具和解决IT素养差距的好处和挑战;(5)以患者为中心的适应,探索NMs如何平衡循证干预与患者偏好和文化考虑;(6)情感和心理支持,强调管理员工阻力和减轻变革疲劳的重要性。结论:本研究的结果强调了管理者在通过适应性领导、战略资源管理和培养学习网络推动EBP实施方面的关键作用。解决组织障碍需要多层次的干预措施,将领导行动与系统推动因素相结合,以促进可持续的、循证的护理实践。研究结果为医疗保健政策制定者、医院管理人员和教育工作者在资源有限的情况下提高EBP的吸收提供了重要的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
期刊最新文献
Development and psychometric evaluation of the DysPalKT for assessing nurses' knowledge of dyspnoea care in patients with cancer receiving palliative care. Knowledge, attitude and practice toward rational use of medications among nurses at hospitals of Dhamar city: a cross-sectional study. Mental health experiences and help-seeking behaviors among Chinese psychiatric nurses: a descriptive qualitative study. Career stress, resilience, coping, and life satisfaction among nursing students: a cross-sectional study. How nurses address psychosocial needs in patients with advanced heart or lung failure: a qualitative interview study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1