Low-priority items are held in visual working memory: Evidence from flexible allocation in a two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) paradigm.

IF 2.3 4区 心理学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Vision Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1167/jov.25.3.5
Holly A Lockhart, Stephen M Emrich
{"title":"Low-priority items are held in visual working memory: Evidence from flexible allocation in a two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) paradigm.","authors":"Holly A Lockhart, Stephen M Emrich","doi":"10.1167/jov.25.3.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Visual working memory (VWM) is characterized as extremely capacity limited. This finding is supported by the dramatic decline in change detection performance beyond a small number of items, as well as the observation of flat error distributions in delayed-estimation tasks. However, continuous resource models predict that small amounts of memory resources can be distributed to items at the expense of memory resolution (resulting in low response precision). These low-resolution memory representations should have nearly flat error distributions that could appear indistinguishable from uniform guessing distributions. In the current study, memory resource allocation was manipulated by varying the probability of an item being probed at recall. Responses were intermixed between continuous response and two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) trials to examine whether these low-probability items could produce above-chance performance, consistent with them being held in memory. For comparison with the distribution of continuous responses, the magnitude of the discrimination between the target and lure colors was manipulated. Accuracy on the 2AFC trials was sensitive to both discrimination difficulty and probe probability manipulations. Critically, above-chance performance was found in the lowest probe probability condition (10% probe probability, equivalent to an item load of 10), suggesting that this condition had low-resolution memory representations rather than no memory representations. These findings are consistent with the predictions of continuous resource models and applications of signal detection models of VWM.</p>","PeriodicalId":49955,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vision","volume":"25 3","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11905579/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vision","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.25.3.5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Visual working memory (VWM) is characterized as extremely capacity limited. This finding is supported by the dramatic decline in change detection performance beyond a small number of items, as well as the observation of flat error distributions in delayed-estimation tasks. However, continuous resource models predict that small amounts of memory resources can be distributed to items at the expense of memory resolution (resulting in low response precision). These low-resolution memory representations should have nearly flat error distributions that could appear indistinguishable from uniform guessing distributions. In the current study, memory resource allocation was manipulated by varying the probability of an item being probed at recall. Responses were intermixed between continuous response and two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) trials to examine whether these low-probability items could produce above-chance performance, consistent with them being held in memory. For comparison with the distribution of continuous responses, the magnitude of the discrimination between the target and lure colors was manipulated. Accuracy on the 2AFC trials was sensitive to both discrimination difficulty and probe probability manipulations. Critically, above-chance performance was found in the lowest probe probability condition (10% probe probability, equivalent to an item load of 10), suggesting that this condition had low-resolution memory representations rather than no memory representations. These findings are consistent with the predictions of continuous resource models and applications of signal detection models of VWM.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低优先级的项目被保留在视觉工作记忆中:来自两种选择强制选择(2AFC)范式中灵活分配的证据。
视觉工作记忆(VWM)具有容量有限的特点。这一发现得到了少量项目之外的变更检测性能急剧下降的支持,以及对延迟估计任务中平坦误差分布的观察。然而,连续资源模型预测,少量的内存资源可以以牺牲内存分辨率为代价分配给项目(导致低响应精度)。这些低分辨率内存表示应该具有几乎平坦的错误分布,看起来与均匀猜测分布无法区分。在当前的研究中,记忆资源的分配是通过改变一个项目在回忆时被探测的概率来操纵的。反应混合在连续反应和两种选择的强迫选择(2AFC)试验中,以检验这些低概率项目是否能产生高于机会的表现,与它们被保存在记忆中一致。为了与连续响应的分布进行比较,对目标和诱饵颜色的区分幅度进行了控制。2AFC试验的准确性对判别难度和探测概率操作都很敏感。至关重要的是,在最低探测概率条件下(10%探测概率,相当于10个项目负载)发现了高于机会的性能,这表明该条件具有低分辨率的内存表示,而不是没有内存表示。这些发现与连续资源模型的预测和VWM信号检测模型的应用是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vision
Journal of Vision 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
218
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Exploring all aspects of biological visual function, including spatial vision, perception, low vision, color vision and more, spanning the fields of neuroscience, psychology and psychophysics.
期刊最新文献
Different effects of flash-grab and frame stimuli on position shift and shape distortion. When sounds control sight: Associative learning modifies perceptual transitions in binocular rivalry. Microsaccadic modulation in goal-directed reaching. Retinal and extra-retinal contributions of blinking to perceptual alternation in bistable apparent motion. Frame effects across space and time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1