Utilization of locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) regression to estimate missing weights in a longitudinal cohort of breast cancer patients.
Alexa Zimbalist, Kelly H Radimer, Isaac J Ergas, Janise M Roh, Charles P Quesenberry, Marilyn L Kwan, Lawrence H Kushi
{"title":"Utilization of locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) regression to estimate missing weights in a longitudinal cohort of breast cancer patients.","authors":"Alexa Zimbalist, Kelly H Radimer, Isaac J Ergas, Janise M Roh, Charles P Quesenberry, Marilyn L Kwan, Lawrence H Kushi","doi":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.02.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Traditional methods to handle missing data rely on making assumptions about missing data patterns. Locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) regression models were explored as a data-driven option to minimize missing weight data in a longitudinal cohort of breast cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Outpatient weights from 2 years prior to breast cancer diagnosis to 10 years post were extracted from electronic health records for 10,778 women with invasive breast cancer diagnosed from 2005-2013 at Kaiser Permanente. LOESS regression models estimated weights at baseline (breast cancer diagnosis) and 6 follow-up time points (6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 months post-baseline). The weights identified by the LOESS models were compared with those identified by the closest-available method, in which the weight measurement closest to each timepoint within a specified time window was selected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the closest-available method, LOESS models identified fewer weights at baseline and 6 months post, but significantly more weights at later follow-up periods. At all timepoints, more than 80% of the weights identified by both approaches differed by 2.50 kilograms or less.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LOESS regression makes effective use of available longitudinal data and may be a beneficial tool to minimize missing longitudinal data in future EHR-based studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50767,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.02.013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Traditional methods to handle missing data rely on making assumptions about missing data patterns. Locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) regression models were explored as a data-driven option to minimize missing weight data in a longitudinal cohort of breast cancer patients.
Methods: Outpatient weights from 2 years prior to breast cancer diagnosis to 10 years post were extracted from electronic health records for 10,778 women with invasive breast cancer diagnosed from 2005-2013 at Kaiser Permanente. LOESS regression models estimated weights at baseline (breast cancer diagnosis) and 6 follow-up time points (6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 months post-baseline). The weights identified by the LOESS models were compared with those identified by the closest-available method, in which the weight measurement closest to each timepoint within a specified time window was selected.
Results: Compared with the closest-available method, LOESS models identified fewer weights at baseline and 6 months post, but significantly more weights at later follow-up periods. At all timepoints, more than 80% of the weights identified by both approaches differed by 2.50 kilograms or less.
Conclusions: LOESS regression makes effective use of available longitudinal data and may be a beneficial tool to minimize missing longitudinal data in future EHR-based studies.
期刊介绍:
The journal emphasizes the application of epidemiologic methods to issues that affect the distribution and determinants of human illness in diverse contexts. Its primary focus is on chronic and acute conditions of diverse etiologies and of major importance to clinical medicine, public health, and health care delivery.