Pain sensitivity questionnaire in endometriosis

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105357
Avonae J. Gentles , Sarah Wong , Natasha L. Orr , Heather Noga , Catherine Allaire , Christina Williams , Mohamed A. Bedaiwy , Caroline Lee , John Kramer , Paul J. Yong
{"title":"Pain sensitivity questionnaire in endometriosis","authors":"Avonae J. Gentles ,&nbsp;Sarah Wong ,&nbsp;Natasha L. Orr ,&nbsp;Heather Noga ,&nbsp;Catherine Allaire ,&nbsp;Christina Williams ,&nbsp;Mohamed A. Bedaiwy ,&nbsp;Caroline Lee ,&nbsp;John Kramer ,&nbsp;Paul J. Yong","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is increasing recognition that nociplastic pain and central sensitization may play a role in endometriosis-associated pain. The Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire Minor (PSQ-M) evaluates subjective widespread pain sensitivity, and is linked to pain outcomes in chronic pain populations. However, evidence connecting the PSQ-M to central sensitization in endometriosis is limited. Using the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) as a comparison, this study compared the PSQ-M as a clinical proxy for central sensitization in endometriosis individuals. Data collected from 983 endometriosis participants (mean age of 34 years), between January 2020 and December 2022, were analyzed from a prospective registry. A significant but weak positive correlation was observed between PSQ-M and CSI scores (r=0.099, p&lt;0.001). A significant but weak correlation was found between the number of central sensitivity syndromes and pelvic pain-related comorbidities with the PSQ-M (r=0.093, p&lt;0.001), compared to a stronger correlation with the CSI (r=0.687, p&lt;0.05). PSQ-M scores were not significantly associated with baseline (r=0.013, p=0.797) or post-operative (r=−0.046, p=0.801) quality-of-life. There was no change in the PSQ-M and a small change in CSI after endometriosis surgery, suggesting that surgical treatment of endometriosis does not directly address central sensitization. In conclusion, the PSQ-M may not be the optimal clinical proxy for central sensitization in endometriosis.</div></div><div><h3>Perspective</h3><div>This study evaluates the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire – Minor (PSQ-M) as a proxy for central sensitization in endometriosis. The PSQ-M showed weak correlations with central sensitivity syndromes and pain scores and was not associated with post-surgical quality-of-life, suggesting it may not be the optimal tool for assessing central sensitization in endometriosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article 105357"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S152659002500584X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is increasing recognition that nociplastic pain and central sensitization may play a role in endometriosis-associated pain. The Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire Minor (PSQ-M) evaluates subjective widespread pain sensitivity, and is linked to pain outcomes in chronic pain populations. However, evidence connecting the PSQ-M to central sensitization in endometriosis is limited. Using the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) as a comparison, this study compared the PSQ-M as a clinical proxy for central sensitization in endometriosis individuals. Data collected from 983 endometriosis participants (mean age of 34 years), between January 2020 and December 2022, were analyzed from a prospective registry. A significant but weak positive correlation was observed between PSQ-M and CSI scores (r=0.099, p<0.001). A significant but weak correlation was found between the number of central sensitivity syndromes and pelvic pain-related comorbidities with the PSQ-M (r=0.093, p<0.001), compared to a stronger correlation with the CSI (r=0.687, p<0.05). PSQ-M scores were not significantly associated with baseline (r=0.013, p=0.797) or post-operative (r=−0.046, p=0.801) quality-of-life. There was no change in the PSQ-M and a small change in CSI after endometriosis surgery, suggesting that surgical treatment of endometriosis does not directly address central sensitization. In conclusion, the PSQ-M may not be the optimal clinical proxy for central sensitization in endometriosis.

Perspective

This study evaluates the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire – Minor (PSQ-M) as a proxy for central sensitization in endometriosis. The PSQ-M showed weak correlations with central sensitivity syndromes and pain scores and was not associated with post-surgical quality-of-life, suggesting it may not be the optimal tool for assessing central sensitization in endometriosis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
子宫内膜异位症疼痛敏感性问卷调查
越来越多的人认识到,致伤性疼痛和中枢致敏可能在子宫内膜异位症相关的疼痛中起作用。疼痛敏感性问卷(PSQ-M)评估主观广泛的疼痛敏感性,并与慢性疼痛人群的疼痛结果有关。然而,将PSQ-M与子宫内膜异位症的中枢致敏联系起来的证据有限。本研究使用中枢致敏量表(CSI)作为比较,比较PSQ-M作为子宫内膜异位症患者中枢致敏的临床指标。从2020年1月至2022年12月期间从983名子宫内膜异位症参与者(平均年龄34岁)收集的数据进行了前瞻性登记分析。PSQ-M与CSI评分呈显著但微弱的正相关(r=0.099, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain
Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.50%
发文量
441
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain publishes original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. Articles selected for publication in the Journal are most commonly reports of original clinical research or reports of original basic research. In addition, invited critical reviews, including meta analyses of drugs for pain management, invited commentaries on reviews, and exceptional case studies are published in the Journal. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals to publish original research.
期刊最新文献
Re: Letter to the Editor Re: Effects of centrally acting analgesics on resting-state electroencephalography biomarker candidates of chronic pain. Quality matters: Interpreting amputation outcomes in CRPS - Authors reply. The effect of positive, neutral, and negative expectations about spinal manipulative therapy on pain intensity in chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial The efficacy and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for comorbid chronic low back pain and insomnia: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled pilot trial How do people with fibromyalgia interpret ambiguous cues in empathy-related healthcare scenarios?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1