Women's Experiences of Induction of Labor and Birth After Prolonged Medical Induction: A Qualitative Study From Denmark.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1111/birt.12912
Caroline Trillingsgaard Mejdahl, Lone Hvidman, Rikke Bek Helmig, Sidsel Boie, Anna Højkjær Larsen, Maria Lundbo, Jeanette Ziska, Stina Lou
{"title":"Women's Experiences of Induction of Labor and Birth After Prolonged Medical Induction: A Qualitative Study From Denmark.","authors":"Caroline Trillingsgaard Mejdahl, Lone Hvidman, Rikke Bek Helmig, Sidsel Boie, Anna Højkjær Larsen, Maria Lundbo, Jeanette Ziska, Stina Lou","doi":"10.1111/birt.12912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing frequency of induction of labor (IOL) prompts explorations into women's experiences. To inform individualized obstetric care, this study aimed to investigate the experiences of Danish pregnant women who underwent out-patient medical IOL and were not in active labor 48 h after IOL initiation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative interview study with 28 women who had experienced prolonged IOL (all indications). The women were recruited at two obstetric departments approximately 48 h after IOL initiation and telephone interviewed 2-6 weeks after birth (average of 37 min duration). Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first theme describes the underlying rationale in the women's description of IOL and birth: 'Motivated by the birth of a healthy baby.' The results show how the women accepted medical indications for IOL, found comfort in the out-patient regimen, and felt secure about the health of their baby, even if the prolonged IOL was frustrating. The results show how 'progress' became a primary motivator for suggesting and accepting interventions. The second theme describes four 'Situations of discouragement' that are clusters of events during IOL and birth that could challenge the women's expectations and boundaries, for example, experiencing excessive pain or not feeling heard. Despite challenges, most women viewed their experiences positively, remaining open to future IOL.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings underscore the complexity of women's experiences during IOL and birth, emphasizing the need for healthcare professionals to navigate diverse, individual preferences while prioritizing maternal and fetal well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12912","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The increasing frequency of induction of labor (IOL) prompts explorations into women's experiences. To inform individualized obstetric care, this study aimed to investigate the experiences of Danish pregnant women who underwent out-patient medical IOL and were not in active labor 48 h after IOL initiation.

Methods: A qualitative interview study with 28 women who had experienced prolonged IOL (all indications). The women were recruited at two obstetric departments approximately 48 h after IOL initiation and telephone interviewed 2-6 weeks after birth (average of 37 min duration). Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: The first theme describes the underlying rationale in the women's description of IOL and birth: 'Motivated by the birth of a healthy baby.' The results show how the women accepted medical indications for IOL, found comfort in the out-patient regimen, and felt secure about the health of their baby, even if the prolonged IOL was frustrating. The results show how 'progress' became a primary motivator for suggesting and accepting interventions. The second theme describes four 'Situations of discouragement' that are clusters of events during IOL and birth that could challenge the women's expectations and boundaries, for example, experiencing excessive pain or not feeling heard. Despite challenges, most women viewed their experiences positively, remaining open to future IOL.

Discussion: The findings underscore the complexity of women's experiences during IOL and birth, emphasizing the need for healthcare professionals to navigate diverse, individual preferences while prioritizing maternal and fetal well-being.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care
Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care is a multidisciplinary, refereed journal devoted to issues and practices in the care of childbearing women, infants, and families. It is written by and for professionals in maternal and neonatal health, nurses, midwives, physicians, public health workers, doulas, social scientists, childbirth educators, lactation counselors, epidemiologists, and other health caregivers and policymakers in perinatal care.
期刊最新文献
Changes in Fear of Childbirth and Its Predictors Over Three COVID-19 Pandemic Waves in Poland. Women's Experiences of Induction of Labor and Birth After Prolonged Medical Induction: A Qualitative Study From Denmark. Birthing With Others: Exploring the Efficacy of One-On-One Professional Support on Physiological Birth and Flow State. Abuse and Disrespect in Obstetric Care in the United States: A Qualitative Descriptive Study of Nurse Experiences. Do Antenatal Interventions Improve Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes for Migrant Women Living in High-Income Countries and What Guidelines Exist for Migrant Women? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1