Correction to “Revolutionizing CO2 Electrolysis: Fluent Gas Transportation within Hydrophobic Porous Cu2O”

Abstract

In the published Figure 1, panels a–c, the scale bars for the SEM images were incorrectly labeled. The scale bars should be 2 μm, as shown in the corrected partial Figure 1 below. Figure 1. Scheme and SEM images of (a) P-Cu₂O-140, (b) P-Cu₂O-240, and (c) P-Cu₂O-340. The durability measurements described at the end of the section “Electrochemical CO₂RR Performance” were performed by using one piece of porous Cu₂O-modified gas diffusion electrode (P-Cu₂O/GDE), which was regenerated after it was used for certain time intervals. This resulted in separate data for different measurement time periods. In assembling the plot of current density versus time for Figure 2g, the data for the time period from 16.5 to 18.5 h was mistakenly imported for both the time period of 16.5–18.5 h and the time period of 18.5–20.5 h. The revised Figure 2g is provided below. Figure 2. (g) Long-term stability of P-Cu₂O-240 at a constant potential of −2.5 V vs RHE. These corrections do not affect the scientific findings or the conclusions reported in the published article. This article has not yet been cited by other publications.