Providing concentrate feed outside of the milking robot increases feed intake in dairy cows without reducing motivation to visit the robot

IF 4.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Animal Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.animal.2025.101459
F.P. Johansen , S. Buijs , G. Arnott
{"title":"Providing concentrate feed outside of the milking robot increases feed intake in dairy cows without reducing motivation to visit the robot","authors":"F.P. Johansen ,&nbsp;S. Buijs ,&nbsp;G. Arnott","doi":"10.1016/j.animal.2025.101459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Appropriate and adequate feeding is essential to maintaining good health, productivity and welfare of dairy cows. Within automatic milking systems, concentrate feed is offered inside the milking robot, and is thought to play a key role in motivating cows to visit the robot for milking. As concentrate feed delivery takes place during milking, the amount of concentrate a cow can consume is limited by milking duration and consumption rate. Thus, some cows may require supplementary feeding, but concerns exist regarding the potential negative effects of allocating concentrate outside of the milking robot on motivation to visit the robot for milking. The study’s primary aims were to assess the effects of providing 80% of the cows’ concentrate allocation inside the robot or inside an out-of-parlour feeder (<strong>OOPF</strong>) on (1) milking frequency, refused milkings, and OOPF visit frequency, (2) lying time, (3) milk yield, and (4) partial mixed ration (<strong>PMR</strong>) intake and amount of daily concentrate allocation not consumed by the cows, and (5) time spent in the robot and OOPF. Forty-eight mid-late lactation dairy cows were split into two treatment groups, one of which received 80% of their concentrate ration inside the milking robot and 20% inside the OOPF (robot high), whereas the other received 20% of their concentrate inside the milking robot and 80% via the OOPF (robot low). The study took place over a 4-week period. GLMMs assessed the effects of treatment and time on the dependent variables milking frequency, refused milkings, OOPF visit frequency, lying time, milk yield, PMR intake, and amount of concentrate feed left unconsumed. No effects of treatment on milking frequency, refused milkings, milking time, or lying time were found. As expected, ‘robot low’ cows visited more frequently and spent more time in the OOPF than ‘robot high’ cows. Finally, ‘robot high’ cows left more of their allocated concentrate ration unconsumed, which suggests that feed consumption may be limited by milking duration and may result in cows not meeting their energy targets. In conclusion, allocating a portion of concentrate feed outside of the milking robot does not affect motivation to visit the robot or time spent resting, only briefly affects PMR intake and milk yield, and may enable cows to better meet their concentrate feed targets, all of which may positively affect health, productivity and welfare.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50789,"journal":{"name":"Animal","volume":"19 4","pages":"Article 101459"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731125000424","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Appropriate and adequate feeding is essential to maintaining good health, productivity and welfare of dairy cows. Within automatic milking systems, concentrate feed is offered inside the milking robot, and is thought to play a key role in motivating cows to visit the robot for milking. As concentrate feed delivery takes place during milking, the amount of concentrate a cow can consume is limited by milking duration and consumption rate. Thus, some cows may require supplementary feeding, but concerns exist regarding the potential negative effects of allocating concentrate outside of the milking robot on motivation to visit the robot for milking. The study’s primary aims were to assess the effects of providing 80% of the cows’ concentrate allocation inside the robot or inside an out-of-parlour feeder (OOPF) on (1) milking frequency, refused milkings, and OOPF visit frequency, (2) lying time, (3) milk yield, and (4) partial mixed ration (PMR) intake and amount of daily concentrate allocation not consumed by the cows, and (5) time spent in the robot and OOPF. Forty-eight mid-late lactation dairy cows were split into two treatment groups, one of which received 80% of their concentrate ration inside the milking robot and 20% inside the OOPF (robot high), whereas the other received 20% of their concentrate inside the milking robot and 80% via the OOPF (robot low). The study took place over a 4-week period. GLMMs assessed the effects of treatment and time on the dependent variables milking frequency, refused milkings, OOPF visit frequency, lying time, milk yield, PMR intake, and amount of concentrate feed left unconsumed. No effects of treatment on milking frequency, refused milkings, milking time, or lying time were found. As expected, ‘robot low’ cows visited more frequently and spent more time in the OOPF than ‘robot high’ cows. Finally, ‘robot high’ cows left more of their allocated concentrate ration unconsumed, which suggests that feed consumption may be limited by milking duration and may result in cows not meeting their energy targets. In conclusion, allocating a portion of concentrate feed outside of the milking robot does not affect motivation to visit the robot or time spent resting, only briefly affects PMR intake and milk yield, and may enable cows to better meet their concentrate feed targets, all of which may positively affect health, productivity and welfare.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在挤奶机器人之外提供浓缩饲料可以增加奶牛的采食量,但不会减少奶牛访问机器人的动机
适当和充足的喂养对保持奶牛的健康、生产力和福利至关重要。在自动挤奶系统中,浓缩饲料被提供在挤奶机器人内部,并且被认为在激励奶牛访问机器人挤奶方面发挥了关键作用。由于浓缩饲料是在挤奶过程中进行的,奶牛可以消耗的浓缩饲料量受到挤奶时间和消耗速度的限制。因此,一些奶牛可能需要补充饲料,但存在这样的担忧,即在挤奶机器人之外分配浓缩液会对奶牛去机器人那里挤奶的动机产生潜在的负面影响。该研究的主要目的是评估在机器人或室外喂食器(OOPF)内提供80%的奶牛精料分配对以下方面的影响:(1)挤奶频率、拒绝挤奶和OOPF访问频率,(2)躺卧时间,(3)产奶量,(4)部分混合日粮(PMR)摄入量和奶牛不消耗的每日精料分配量,以及(5)在机器人和OOPF中花费的时间。48头泌乳中后期奶牛被分为两个处理组,其中一组在挤奶机器人内接受80%的精料,20%的精料在OOPF内(机器人高),而另一组在挤奶机器人内接受20%的精料,80%的精料通过OOPF(机器人低)。这项研究持续了4周。glmm评估了处理和时间对因变量挤奶频率、拒绝挤奶、OOPF访问频率、躺卧时间、产奶量、PMR摄入量和未消耗精料量的影响。处理对挤奶频率、拒绝挤奶、挤奶时间或躺卧时间没有影响。正如预期的那样,“机器人低”的奶牛比“机器人高”的奶牛访问频率更高,在OOPF中花费的时间更长。最后,“机器人高”奶牛没有消耗更多分配的精料,这表明饲料消耗可能受到挤奶时间的限制,并可能导致奶牛无法达到其能量目标。综上所述,在挤奶机器人之外分配一部分精料并不会影响参观机器人的动机或休息时间,只会短暂影响PMR摄入量和产奶量,并可能使奶牛更好地达到精料饲料目标,所有这些都可能对奶牛的健康、生产力和福利产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Animal
Animal 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
246
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Editorial board animal attracts the best research in animal biology and animal systems from across the spectrum of the agricultural, biomedical, and environmental sciences. It is the central element in an exciting collaboration between the British Society of Animal Science (BSAS), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) and the European Federation of Animal Science (EAAP) and represents a merging of three scientific journals: Animal Science; Animal Research; Reproduction, Nutrition, Development. animal publishes original cutting-edge research, ''hot'' topics and horizon-scanning reviews on animal-related aspects of the life sciences at the molecular, cellular, organ, whole animal and production system levels. The main subject areas include: breeding and genetics; nutrition; physiology and functional biology of systems; behaviour, health and welfare; farming systems, environmental impact and climate change; product quality, human health and well-being. Animal models and papers dealing with the integration of research between these topics and their impact on the environment and people are particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
Challenging a mathematical model of amino acid metabolism in the small intestine, developed in pigs Genetic parameters of larval weight and length in yellow mealworm under tropical conditions: heritability and implications for breeding programmes Dietary hydrolysed tannins regulate carcass performance and meat traits in Hu sheep through microbial regulation Review: Understanding cattle social behaviour in modern penned production systems with AI technology: Are we tracking welfare indicators? Effects of enrichment and heat stress on fluctuating asymmetry and feather structure of broiler chickens.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1