Input taxes in agriculture: Experiences and perspectives for European agriculture

IF 6.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Economics Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-09 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108575
Robert Finger , Anders Branth Pedersen
{"title":"Input taxes in agriculture: Experiences and perspectives for European agriculture","authors":"Robert Finger ,&nbsp;Anders Branth Pedersen","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Taxes on agricultural inputs such as fertilizers and pesticides are often discussed, but there are large knowledge gaps as existing evidence on the functioning, experiences and limitations is outdated and scattered. We fill this gap by synthesizing knowledge on agricultural input taxes and focusing on their potential for European policy. We show that there is great potential for input taxes to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of agri-environmental policies. If properly designed, (i) taxes can provide targeted incentives to achieve environmental objectives in a cost-effective way, (ii) a redistribution of tax revenues to farmers can limit income effects, (iii) when taxes replace command and control measures, this can contribute to administrative simplification. However, the experience with input taxes in Europe is mixed. Input taxes have often failed to achieve their intended effects, e.g. because of poor tax design and low tax levels, and there are other limitations that generate strong resistance in policy debates. We identify ways to overcome these limitations and present lessons from positive examples, such as the Danish experience. We argue that agricultural policy needs more than input taxes, but that they should be part of a comprehensive mix of instruments within an agricultural and food policy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"233 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800925000588","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Taxes on agricultural inputs such as fertilizers and pesticides are often discussed, but there are large knowledge gaps as existing evidence on the functioning, experiences and limitations is outdated and scattered. We fill this gap by synthesizing knowledge on agricultural input taxes and focusing on their potential for European policy. We show that there is great potential for input taxes to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of agri-environmental policies. If properly designed, (i) taxes can provide targeted incentives to achieve environmental objectives in a cost-effective way, (ii) a redistribution of tax revenues to farmers can limit income effects, (iii) when taxes replace command and control measures, this can contribute to administrative simplification. However, the experience with input taxes in Europe is mixed. Input taxes have often failed to achieve their intended effects, e.g. because of poor tax design and low tax levels, and there are other limitations that generate strong resistance in policy debates. We identify ways to overcome these limitations and present lessons from positive examples, such as the Danish experience. We argue that agricultural policy needs more than input taxes, but that they should be part of a comprehensive mix of instruments within an agricultural and food policy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农业进项税:欧洲农业的经验与展望
对化肥和农药等农业投入物征税经常被讨论,但由于有关其功能、经验和限制的现有证据过时且分散,因此存在很大的知识空白。我们通过综合有关农业进项税的知识并关注其对欧洲政策的潜力来填补这一空白。我们的研究表明,进项税在提高农业环境政策的有效性和效率方面具有巨大的潜力。如果设计得当,(i)税收可以提供有针对性的激励,以具有成本效益的方式实现环境目标;(ii)将税收重新分配给农民可以限制收入影响;(iii)当税收取代指挥和控制措施时,这可以有助于行政简化。然而,欧洲在进项税方面的经验参差不齐。进项税往往未能达到预期效果,例如,由于税收设计不良和税收水平低,以及在政策辩论中产生强烈阻力的其他限制。我们确定克服这些限制的方法,并从积极的例子,如丹麦的经验中提出教训。我们认为,农业政策需要的不仅仅是进项税,还应该是农业和粮食政策中综合工具组合的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Economics
Ecological Economics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
313
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership. Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to ‘Integrating post-growth economics into transformative adaptation: Property relations, capital, and democratic planning’ [Ecological Economics (2026) Volume 242 108895] Beyond the chain: Lead firm strategies and sustainability governance in the global coffee sector Managing shade trees, balancing trade-offs: Effects of shade-tree density on economic performance of Brazilian cocoa agroforests GDP alternatives revisited: A systematic review and thematic analysis of barriers to the adoption of alternative measures of economic progress Multilevel drivers of smallholder farmers' coping strategies to climate variability: Insights from Assam, India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1