Cognitive profiles in primary progressive aphasia variants: A cross-cultural Australian and Spanish investigation

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of the Neurological Sciences Pub Date : 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jns.2025.123446
Lucía Fernandez-Romero , James Carrick , Ramon Landin-Romero , David Foxe , Miguel Yus-Fuertes , Alberto Marcos-Dolado , Jordi A. Matias-Guiu , Olivier Piguet
{"title":"Cognitive profiles in primary progressive aphasia variants: A cross-cultural Australian and Spanish investigation","authors":"Lucía Fernandez-Romero ,&nbsp;James Carrick ,&nbsp;Ramon Landin-Romero ,&nbsp;David Foxe ,&nbsp;Miguel Yus-Fuertes ,&nbsp;Alberto Marcos-Dolado ,&nbsp;Jordi A. Matias-Guiu ,&nbsp;Olivier Piguet","doi":"10.1016/j.jns.2025.123446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The effect of cultural differences in neurodegenerative diseases is not well understood. We aimed to investigate the cognitive profiles of English- and Spanish-speaking individuals with primary progressive aphasia (PPA).</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted with 461 participants: 215 participants from Australia and 246 from Spain. The Australian cohort included 131 PPA patients: 37 nonfluent PPA (nfvPPA), 49 semantic PPA (svPPA), 45 logopenic (lvPPA) and 84 healthy controls (HC); the Spanish cohort had 162 PPA: 64 nfvPPA, 31 vsPPA, 67 lvPPA, and 84 HC. All participants completed the ACE-III and other tests assessing verbal working memory, attention/executive functioning, visuospatial constructional abilities and episodic memory. A subgroup of participants underwent structural brain MRI. Cognitive performance and neuroimaging were compared between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The most salient differences between each variant and HC were similar in the Australian and Spanish cohort. However, the Spanish cohort scored lower than the Australian cohort in most cognitive tests evaluated (ACE-III total, attention, memory and visuospatial in nfvPPA; attention, memory, and visuospatial in svPPA; and memory, language, and visuospatial in lvPPA). Differences were particularly pronounced in the visuospatial subdomain among nonfluent variant PPA. Cortical thickness analysis showed the expected regional atrophy in each PPA variant, but with no greater atrophy in the Spanish cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings revealed an impairment in other cognitive domains beyond language in PPA. However, Spanish patients exhibited more generalized cognitive involvement despite similar demographic and neuroimaging profiles, suggesting that cultural and resilience factors may influence PPA presentations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17417,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Neurological Sciences","volume":"472 ","pages":"Article 123446"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022510X25000632","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The effect of cultural differences in neurodegenerative diseases is not well understood. We aimed to investigate the cognitive profiles of English- and Spanish-speaking individuals with primary progressive aphasia (PPA).

Methodology

A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted with 461 participants: 215 participants from Australia and 246 from Spain. The Australian cohort included 131 PPA patients: 37 nonfluent PPA (nfvPPA), 49 semantic PPA (svPPA), 45 logopenic (lvPPA) and 84 healthy controls (HC); the Spanish cohort had 162 PPA: 64 nfvPPA, 31 vsPPA, 67 lvPPA, and 84 HC. All participants completed the ACE-III and other tests assessing verbal working memory, attention/executive functioning, visuospatial constructional abilities and episodic memory. A subgroup of participants underwent structural brain MRI. Cognitive performance and neuroimaging were compared between groups.

Results

The most salient differences between each variant and HC were similar in the Australian and Spanish cohort. However, the Spanish cohort scored lower than the Australian cohort in most cognitive tests evaluated (ACE-III total, attention, memory and visuospatial in nfvPPA; attention, memory, and visuospatial in svPPA; and memory, language, and visuospatial in lvPPA). Differences were particularly pronounced in the visuospatial subdomain among nonfluent variant PPA. Cortical thickness analysis showed the expected regional atrophy in each PPA variant, but with no greater atrophy in the Spanish cohort.

Conclusion

These findings revealed an impairment in other cognitive domains beyond language in PPA. However, Spanish patients exhibited more generalized cognitive involvement despite similar demographic and neuroimaging profiles, suggesting that cultural and resilience factors may influence PPA presentations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原发性进行性失语症变体的认知概况:澳大利亚和西班牙的跨文化调查
文化差异对神经退行性疾病的影响尚不清楚。我们的目的是研究英语和西班牙语患者原发性进行性失语症(PPA)的认知特征。方法对461名参与者进行了比较横断面研究:215名来自澳大利亚,246名来自西班牙。澳大利亚队列包括131名PPA患者:37名非流利PPA (nfvPPA), 49名语义PPA (svPPA), 45名logopenic (lvPPA)和84名健康对照(HC);西班牙队列有162例PPA: nfvPPA 64例,vsPPA 31例,lvPPA 67例,HC 84例。所有参与者都完成了ACE-III和其他测试,评估口头工作记忆、注意力/执行功能、视觉空间构建能力和情景记忆。另一组参与者接受了结构性脑MRI检查。比较两组之间的认知表现和神经影像学。结果在澳大利亚和西班牙队列中,各变异和HC之间最显著的差异相似。然而,在大多数评估的认知测试中,西班牙队列得分低于澳大利亚队列(ACE-III总分,nfvPPA的注意力、记忆和视觉空间;svPPA的注意、记忆和视觉空间;以及lvPPA的记忆、语言和视觉空间)。在不流利的PPA变体中,视觉空间子域的差异尤为明显。皮质厚度分析显示,每个PPA变体都出现了预期的区域萎缩,但在西班牙队列中没有出现更大的萎缩。结论PPA患者存在语言以外的认知障碍。然而,尽管人口统计学和神经影像学特征相似,西班牙患者表现出更广泛的认知参与,这表明文化和恢复力因素可能影响PPA的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Journal of the Neurological Sciences 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
313
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Neurological Sciences provides a medium for the prompt publication of original articles in neurology and neuroscience from around the world. JNS places special emphasis on articles that: 1) provide guidance to clinicians around the world (Best Practices, Global Neurology); 2) report cutting-edge science related to neurology (Basic and Translational Sciences); 3) educate readers about relevant and practical clinical outcomes in neurology (Outcomes Research); and 4) summarize or editorialize the current state of the literature (Reviews, Commentaries, and Editorials). JNS accepts most types of manuscripts for consideration including original research papers, short communications, reviews, book reviews, letters to the Editor, opinions and editorials. Topics considered will be from neurology-related fields that are of interest to practicing physicians around the world. Examples include neuromuscular diseases, demyelination, atrophies, dementia, neoplasms, infections, epilepsies, disturbances of consciousness, stroke and cerebral circulation, growth and development, plasticity and intermediary metabolism.
期刊最新文献
The ongoing debate about the association between benzodiazepines and dementia. Persistence of pulsatile tinnitus in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension following resolution of papilledema: Response. Letter to the Editor: Persistence of pulsatile tinnitus in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension following resolution of papilledema. Corrigendum to Simple quantitative planimetric measurement of nigrosome-1 for clinical settings [Journal of the Neurological Sciences 454 (2023) 120857]. Short-term vigabatrin is safe and effective in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1