Comparative effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for dyspnea management in advanced cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100671
An Thuy Vo , Kim-Ngan Thi Ta , Kai-Jen Chuang
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for dyspnea management in advanced cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis","authors":"An Thuy Vo ,&nbsp;Kim-Ngan Thi Ta ,&nbsp;Kai-Jen Chuang","doi":"10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate and rank the effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for managing dyspnea severity, anxiety, exercise capacity, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with advanced cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive search of PUBMED, HINARI, CENTRAL, and ResearchGate was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to March 2024. Network meta-analysis was performed to compare interventions, calculating mean differences (MD) and standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). P-scores were used to rank the interventions. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool, and the quality of evidence (QOE) was evaluated using the GRADE framework.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 42 RCTs, encompassing 3,832 patients, were included in the analysis. Among the evaluated interventions, high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) demonstrated the most significant improvement in dyspnea relief (SMD = −1.91; 95% CI: −3.32 to −0.49; QOE: moderate), followed by acupressure/reflexology (SMD = −1.04; 95% CI: −2.02 to −0.06; QOE: very low). Activity rehabilitation was the only intervention that significantly reduced anxiety compared to the control group (SMD = −0.64; 95% CI: −0.97 to −0.32; QOE: very low). While all interventions showed trends of improving exercise capacity, none reached statistical significance. Notably, acupressure/reflexology significantly enhanced HRQoL (SMD = 1.55; 95% CI: 0.22 to 2.88; QOE: moderate).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Non-pharmacological interventions, particularly HFNC and acupressure/reflexology, were more effective than pharmacological approaches in improving dyspnea relief and HRQoL. However, the low quality of evidence underscores the need for high-quality, large-scale trials to confirm these findings and refine treatment strategies for dyspnea management in advanced cancer patients.</div></div><div><h3>Systematic review registration</h3><div>PROSPERO CRD42023479041.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8569,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100671"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2347562525000198","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate and rank the effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for managing dyspnea severity, anxiety, exercise capacity, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with advanced cancer.

Methods

A comprehensive search of PUBMED, HINARI, CENTRAL, and ResearchGate was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to March 2024. Network meta-analysis was performed to compare interventions, calculating mean differences (MD) and standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). P-scores were used to rank the interventions. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool, and the quality of evidence (QOE) was evaluated using the GRADE framework.

Results

A total of 42 RCTs, encompassing 3,832 patients, were included in the analysis. Among the evaluated interventions, high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) demonstrated the most significant improvement in dyspnea relief (SMD = −1.91; 95% CI: −3.32 to −0.49; QOE: moderate), followed by acupressure/reflexology (SMD = −1.04; 95% CI: −2.02 to −0.06; QOE: very low). Activity rehabilitation was the only intervention that significantly reduced anxiety compared to the control group (SMD = −0.64; 95% CI: −0.97 to −0.32; QOE: very low). While all interventions showed trends of improving exercise capacity, none reached statistical significance. Notably, acupressure/reflexology significantly enhanced HRQoL (SMD = 1.55; 95% CI: 0.22 to 2.88; QOE: moderate).

Conclusions

Non-pharmacological interventions, particularly HFNC and acupressure/reflexology, were more effective than pharmacological approaches in improving dyspnea relief and HRQoL. However, the low quality of evidence underscores the need for high-quality, large-scale trials to confirm these findings and refine treatment strategies for dyspnea management in advanced cancer patients.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO CRD42023479041.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
方法 对PUBMED、HINARI、CENTRAL和ResearchGate进行了全面检索,以确定截至2024年3月发表的随机对照试验(RCT)。通过网络荟萃分析对干预措施进行比较,计算平均差异(MD)和标准化平均差异(SMD)以及 95% 置信区间(CI)。P值用于对干预措施进行排序。使用 Cochrane 工具评估了偏倚风险,并使用 GRADE 框架评估了证据质量(QOE)。在接受评估的干预措施中,高流量鼻插管(HFNC)在缓解呼吸困难方面的改善最为显著(SMD = -1.91; 95% CI: -3.32 to -0.49;QOE:中度),其次是穴位按摩/反射疗法(SMD = -1.04; 95% CI: -2.02 to -0.06;QOE:极低)。与对照组相比,活动康复是唯一能显著降低焦虑的干预措施(SMD = -0.64;95% CI:-0.97 至 -0.32;QOE:非常低)。虽然所有干预措施都显示出提高运动能力的趋势,但都没有达到统计学意义。值得注意的是,穴位按摩/反射疗法显著提高了 HRQoL(SMD = 1.55;95% CI:0.22 至 2.88;QOE:中等)。结论在改善呼吸困难缓解和 HRQoL 方面,非药物干预,尤其是高频核磁和穴位按摩/反射疗法,比药物疗法更有效。然而,由于证据质量较低,因此需要进行高质量的大规模试验来证实这些发现,并完善晚期癌症患者呼吸困难管理的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
136
审稿时长
31 days
期刊最新文献
Psychological distress in newly diagnosed patients with gastrointestinal cancer: A scoping review Comparative effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for dyspnea management in advanced cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis The development and preliminary evaluation of a financial navigation program among patients with breast cancer in China Self-care and associated factors of patients with permanent colostomies: A structural equation model The promising application of acupressure for management of cancer-related lymphedema: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1