A review study of digital forensics in IoT: Process models, phases, architectures, and ontologies

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Forensic Science International-Digital Investigation Pub Date : 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1016/j.fsidi.2025.301912
Thiago J. Silva , Edson OliveiraJr , Maximiano Eduardo Pereira , Avelino F. Zorzo
{"title":"A review study of digital forensics in IoT: Process models, phases, architectures, and ontologies","authors":"Thiago J. Silva ,&nbsp;Edson OliveiraJr ,&nbsp;Maximiano Eduardo Pereira ,&nbsp;Avelino F. Zorzo","doi":"10.1016/j.fsidi.2025.301912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Internet of Things (IoT) involves integrating uniquely identifiable computing devices into various infrastructures. Technological advancements have led to a proliferation of interconnected devices in public and private infrastructures, such as healthcare, transportation, and manufacturing. However, this expansion also presents significant challenges, including managing large volumes of data, navigating diverse infrastructures, dealing with network limitations, and lacking standards in IoT device formats. The increase in digital crimes has spurred the growth of the Digital Forensics (DF) field, which plays a crucial role in various interdisciplinary contexts. DF involves analyzing digital crime-related data and going through phases such as identification, collection, organization, and presentation of evidence. As DF develops, there are emerging structural and methodological initiatives aimed at formalizing concepts and establishing a common vocabulary. The literature has proposed various frameworks, conceptual models, methodologies, and ontologies to support this area. To identify and examine existing models, frameworks, methodologies, or ontologies for digital forensics on the Internet of Things (IoT), this article presents a systematic literature review (SLR). The systematic literature review outlined methods for constructing models, different types of models, feasibility criteria, evaluation methods, and models for different stages and aspects of DF. The findings were derived from an analysis of 23 primary studies, which helped address four specific research questions. Additionally, the paper suggests further model-based assistance for DF research, aiming to assist researchers and professionals in addressing current research gaps. The contributions of this work aim to fill the gaps imposed by the practical implications for digital forensic investigators in IoT. In this case, one can mention the use of DF models and phases to assist in the analysis of evidence, recoveries, information, and identification of data patterns sent via IoT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48481,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International-Digital Investigation","volume":"53 ","pages":"Article 301912"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International-Digital Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666281725000514","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) involves integrating uniquely identifiable computing devices into various infrastructures. Technological advancements have led to a proliferation of interconnected devices in public and private infrastructures, such as healthcare, transportation, and manufacturing. However, this expansion also presents significant challenges, including managing large volumes of data, navigating diverse infrastructures, dealing with network limitations, and lacking standards in IoT device formats. The increase in digital crimes has spurred the growth of the Digital Forensics (DF) field, which plays a crucial role in various interdisciplinary contexts. DF involves analyzing digital crime-related data and going through phases such as identification, collection, organization, and presentation of evidence. As DF develops, there are emerging structural and methodological initiatives aimed at formalizing concepts and establishing a common vocabulary. The literature has proposed various frameworks, conceptual models, methodologies, and ontologies to support this area. To identify and examine existing models, frameworks, methodologies, or ontologies for digital forensics on the Internet of Things (IoT), this article presents a systematic literature review (SLR). The systematic literature review outlined methods for constructing models, different types of models, feasibility criteria, evaluation methods, and models for different stages and aspects of DF. The findings were derived from an analysis of 23 primary studies, which helped address four specific research questions. Additionally, the paper suggests further model-based assistance for DF research, aiming to assist researchers and professionals in addressing current research gaps. The contributions of this work aim to fill the gaps imposed by the practical implications for digital forensic investigators in IoT. In this case, one can mention the use of DF models and phases to assist in the analysis of evidence, recoveries, information, and identification of data patterns sent via IoT.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
76 days
期刊最新文献
A review study of digital forensics in IoT: Process models, phases, architectures, and ontologies Corrigendum to “Adding transparency to uncertainty: An argument-based method for evaluative opinions” [FSIDI 48 (2023) 301657] Editorial Board More on digital evidence exceptionalism: Critique of the argument-based method for evaluative opinions Editorial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1