COSMIN systematic review and meta-analysis of the measurement properties of the PANSS-6

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY European Neuropsychopharmacology Pub Date : 2025-03-09 DOI:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2025.02.008
Simon Geck , Maximilian Roithmeier , Markus Bühner , Sophia Wehr , Lucia Weigel , Josef Priller , John M. Davis , Stefan Leucht
{"title":"COSMIN systematic review and meta-analysis of the measurement properties of the PANSS-6","authors":"Simon Geck ,&nbsp;Maximilian Roithmeier ,&nbsp;Markus Bühner ,&nbsp;Sophia Wehr ,&nbsp;Lucia Weigel ,&nbsp;Josef Priller ,&nbsp;John M. Davis ,&nbsp;Stefan Leucht","doi":"10.1016/j.euroneuro.2025.02.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-30) is the standard instrument for assessing symptoms of schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders. However, its long administration time and structural issues have prompted the development of shorter versions. The PANSS-6, derived through Item Response Theory and Rasch analysis of the PANSS-8, emerged as a potential alternative. Comprising three positive and three negative symptom items, the PANSS-6 offers a more feasible assessment tool. However, its measurement properties have never been systematically reviewed.</div><div>We applied the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analytical procedures to assess the psychometric properties of the PANSS-6. COSMIN comprises several steps: literature search, risk-of-bias assessments, assessing the updated criteria for good measurement properties, grading the quality of the evidence and feasibility aspects.</div><div>We included 13 publications. The PANSS-6 showed sufficient content validity, structural validity, measurement invariance, reliability, criterion validity, construct validity and responsiveness according to COSMIN. On some of them only a small body of evidence is currently available. For internal consistency, cross-cultural validity and measurement error there was not enough evidence for a definite rating. Its short administration time of only 15–20 mins renders feasibility good.</div><div>The PANSS-6 does not cover all schizophrenia symptoms but focuses on the core symptoms in favor of a feasible administration time. The evidence available on its measurement properties yields sufficient results for its purpose - the assessment of symptom severity and its change. According to COSMIN it can potentially be recommended for use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12049,"journal":{"name":"European Neuropsychopharmacology","volume":"94 ","pages":"Pages 41-50"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Neuropsychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924977X25000318","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-30) is the standard instrument for assessing symptoms of schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders. However, its long administration time and structural issues have prompted the development of shorter versions. The PANSS-6, derived through Item Response Theory and Rasch analysis of the PANSS-8, emerged as a potential alternative. Comprising three positive and three negative symptom items, the PANSS-6 offers a more feasible assessment tool. However, its measurement properties have never been systematically reviewed.
We applied the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analytical procedures to assess the psychometric properties of the PANSS-6. COSMIN comprises several steps: literature search, risk-of-bias assessments, assessing the updated criteria for good measurement properties, grading the quality of the evidence and feasibility aspects.
We included 13 publications. The PANSS-6 showed sufficient content validity, structural validity, measurement invariance, reliability, criterion validity, construct validity and responsiveness according to COSMIN. On some of them only a small body of evidence is currently available. For internal consistency, cross-cultural validity and measurement error there was not enough evidence for a definite rating. Its short administration time of only 15–20 mins renders feasibility good.
The PANSS-6 does not cover all schizophrenia symptoms but focuses on the core symptoms in favor of a feasible administration time. The evidence available on its measurement properties yields sufficient results for its purpose - the assessment of symptom severity and its change. According to COSMIN it can potentially be recommended for use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COSMIN对PANSS-6测量特性的系统评价和荟萃分析
阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS-30)是评估精神分裂症和相关精神障碍症状的标准工具。然而,由于其管理时间长和结构问题,促使其发展了较短的版本。PANSS-6是通过项目反应理论和Rasch对PANSS-8的分析而衍生出来的,是一种潜在的替代方案。PANSS-6包括3个阳性和3个阴性症状项目,提供了一个更可行的评估工具。然而,其测量特性从未被系统地研究过。我们采用基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估PANSS-6的心理测量特性。COSMIN包括几个步骤:文献检索、偏倚风险评估、评估良好测量特性的最新标准、对证据质量和可行性进行分级。我们纳入了13篇出版物。根据COSMIN测试结果,PANSS-6具有足够的内容效度、结构效度、测量不方差、信度、标准效度、结构效度和反应性。关于其中的一些,目前只有少量的证据可用。在内部一致性、跨文化效度和测量误差方面,没有足够的证据来确定评级。施用时间短,仅15-20分钟,可行性好。PANSS-6不包括所有精神分裂症症状,但侧重于核心症状,有利于可行的给药时间。关于其测量特性的现有证据为其目的提供了足够的结果-评估症状严重程度及其变化。根据COSMIN的说法,它可能被推荐使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Neuropsychopharmacology
European Neuropsychopharmacology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
5.40%
发文量
730
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: European Neuropsychopharmacology is the official publication of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology (ECNP). In accordance with the mission of the College, the journal focuses on clinical and basic science contributions that advance our understanding of brain function and human behaviour and enable translation into improved treatments and enhanced public health impact in psychiatry. Recent years have been characterized by exciting advances in basic knowledge and available experimental techniques in neuroscience and genomics. However, clinical translation of these findings has not been as rapid. The journal aims to narrow this gap by promoting findings that are expected to have a major impact on both our understanding of the biological bases of mental disorders and the development and improvement of treatments, ideally paving the way for prevention and recovery.
期刊最新文献
Strategies for enhancing methodological rigor and clinical relevance of eating disorders-schizophrenia spectrum disorders risk association studies Personality, not cognition, distinguishes chronic ayahuasca and cannabis users from non-users Updating clozapine prescribing guidelines in Italy: a step forward modernity Predictors of treatment success in patients with substance use disorder (SUD) and co-morbid attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): Results from the International Naturalistic Cohort Study of ADHD and SUD (INCAS) Comment on “All-cause and cause-specific mortality in people with mental disorders: a population-based study on risk evaluation, effect modifiers and excess life-years lost in Hong Kong”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1