Predicting agricultural drought in central Europe by using machine learning algorithms

IF 4.8 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Agriculture and Food Research Pub Date : 2025-03-02 DOI:10.1016/j.jafr.2025.101783
Endre Harsányi
{"title":"Predicting agricultural drought in central Europe by using machine learning algorithms","authors":"Endre Harsányi","doi":"10.1016/j.jafr.2025.101783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding the evolution, mechanisms, and trajectories of agricultural drought is an essential strategy for achieving sustainable crop production. Thus, this research evaluates the patterns and magnitude of agriculture droughts using Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) from 1926 to 2020 in eastern Hungary, and assess the performance of six machine learning models (Random Forest (RF), Extra Trees (ET), Gradient Boosting (GB), Extreme Gradient Boost (XGB), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Multi-Layer Perceptron (ANN-MLP)) in predicting agriculture droughts. Results showed a decreasing trend of monthly rainfall and decreasing trend of SPEI monthly values indicating more events in the study area. Furthermore, frequency and intensity analysis revealed a total of 18 % of recorded events were classified as SPEI-3 moderate to extreme drought events (in months) with the highest drought intensity (D1 = −2.43) in January 2007. Overall, 16 years were identified as droughts by SPEI-3 to SPEI-12 in the 1st three decades (1926–1956), 12 drought years from 1957 to 1986 and 21 drought years from 1987 to 2020. Among the six machine learning algorithms, the RF model performed the best in the training phase, with the highest R<sup>2</sup> = 0.75, lowest RMSE = 0.49, and MAE = 0.4. Like the training stage, RF outperformed among other algorithms achieving the highest accuracy. Overall, the ML models can be ranked as RF &gt; XGB &gt; ETR &gt; GBR &gt; ANN-MLP &gt; SVM. The findings of this research promote RF as a reliable algorithm for predicting SPEI droughts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34393,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agriculture and Food Research","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 101783"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agriculture and Food Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666154325001541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the evolution, mechanisms, and trajectories of agricultural drought is an essential strategy for achieving sustainable crop production. Thus, this research evaluates the patterns and magnitude of agriculture droughts using Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) from 1926 to 2020 in eastern Hungary, and assess the performance of six machine learning models (Random Forest (RF), Extra Trees (ET), Gradient Boosting (GB), Extreme Gradient Boost (XGB), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Multi-Layer Perceptron (ANN-MLP)) in predicting agriculture droughts. Results showed a decreasing trend of monthly rainfall and decreasing trend of SPEI monthly values indicating more events in the study area. Furthermore, frequency and intensity analysis revealed a total of 18 % of recorded events were classified as SPEI-3 moderate to extreme drought events (in months) with the highest drought intensity (D1 = −2.43) in January 2007. Overall, 16 years were identified as droughts by SPEI-3 to SPEI-12 in the 1st three decades (1926–1956), 12 drought years from 1957 to 1986 and 21 drought years from 1987 to 2020. Among the six machine learning algorithms, the RF model performed the best in the training phase, with the highest R2 = 0.75, lowest RMSE = 0.49, and MAE = 0.4. Like the training stage, RF outperformed among other algorithms achieving the highest accuracy. Overall, the ML models can be ranked as RF > XGB > ETR > GBR > ANN-MLP > SVM. The findings of this research promote RF as a reliable algorithm for predicting SPEI droughts.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
A study on smart mobility in Kuala Lumpur
IF 0 2017 2nd International Conference on Computing and Communications Technologies (ICCCT)Pub Date : 2017-02-01 DOI: 10.1109/ICCCT2.2017.7972241
David Hong, Lai-Wan Wong
Scaling Up Innovation - Exemplary Initiatives for Sustainable Development in European Smart Cities with a Focus on Smart Mobility
IF 0 European Journal of Sustainable DevelopmentPub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.14207/ejsd.2023.v12n3p229
Niki Derlukiewicz, Łukasz Szałata, Dominika Mańkowska
Sustainability Assessment of Smart Mobility Projects in Finland: A Comparative Analysis
IF 0 Transportation Research ProcediaPub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2024.12.068
Shahid Hussain , Valtteri Ahonen , Pekka Leviäkangas
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
193
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
High-pressure processing of Porphyra sp.: A sustainable approach for enhanced protein and phycobiliprotein extraction and nutritional quality Aflatoxin evaluation and integrated management strategies to minimize toxin contamination in maize and peanuts Ethnotraditional uses and potential industrial and nutritional applications of secondary metabolites of genus Jatropha L. (Euphorbiaceae): A review Chicken meat hydrolysate improves acetaminophen-induced liver injury by alleviating oxidative stress via modulation in Keap1/Nrf2/HO-1 signaling in BALB/c mice Antibacterial potential of cell-free supernatants from Liquorilactobacillus nagelii and Lactococcus garvieae isolated from the gastrointestinal tract of Asian green mussel (Perna viridis) against foodborne pathogenic and spoilage bacteria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1