Awareness of genomic testing among patients with breast cancer in Europe

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Breast Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1016/j.breast.2025.104436
Antonella Cardone , Dany Bell , Conchi Biurrun , Francesco Cognetti , Fatima Cardoso , Ana Ramirez Piris , Csaba Degi , Michael Patrick Lux , Richard Simcock , Johanna Wassermann , Rosanna D'Antona , Isabel T. Rubio
{"title":"Awareness of genomic testing among patients with breast cancer in Europe","authors":"Antonella Cardone ,&nbsp;Dany Bell ,&nbsp;Conchi Biurrun ,&nbsp;Francesco Cognetti ,&nbsp;Fatima Cardoso ,&nbsp;Ana Ramirez Piris ,&nbsp;Csaba Degi ,&nbsp;Michael Patrick Lux ,&nbsp;Richard Simcock ,&nbsp;Johanna Wassermann ,&nbsp;Rosanna D'Antona ,&nbsp;Isabel T. Rubio","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Genomic testing, involving expression profiling of tumour tissue, is a powerful tool for determining appropriate treatments for certain cancer patients. This study aimed to evaluate awareness of genomic testing in breast cancer patients in five European countries.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The survey was initiated by Cancer Patients Europe and developed with patient associations, oncologists, and a psycho-oncologist. Participants were recruited via email and social media and completed a 42-question internet survey.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 1383 participants in eligible countries completing the survey, 566 women with current or previous HR+/HER2- breast cancer, potentially eligible for genomic testing, were analysed. 245 (43.3 %) were aged 50–59 years and 381 (67.3 %) had received higher education. 238 participants (42.1 %) had heard about genomic testing; 122 (21.6 %) were informed of their eligibility for testing, and 104 (18.4 %) were given reasons for the test. The majority (N = 479; 84.6 %) felt they lacked sufficient information to decide, and only 139 (24.6 %) opted for testing. Overall, 246 (43.5 %) wanted more information on additional testing and 234 (41.3 %) wanted more information on treatment options. The main information sources were medical professionals (N = 363; 64.1 %) and the internet (N = 351; 62.0 %). However, 398 participants (70.3 %) indicated that their healthcare professionals did not advise them on where to find more information.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study highlights insufficient awareness of, and access to, genomic testing in breast cancer. Healthcare professionals need to improve communication with patients regarding genomic testing and involve them in shared decision-making. Likewise, patient associations have a role in providing clear information to patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 104436"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977625000554","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Genomic testing, involving expression profiling of tumour tissue, is a powerful tool for determining appropriate treatments for certain cancer patients. This study aimed to evaluate awareness of genomic testing in breast cancer patients in five European countries.

Methods

The survey was initiated by Cancer Patients Europe and developed with patient associations, oncologists, and a psycho-oncologist. Participants were recruited via email and social media and completed a 42-question internet survey.

Results

Of 1383 participants in eligible countries completing the survey, 566 women with current or previous HR+/HER2- breast cancer, potentially eligible for genomic testing, were analysed. 245 (43.3 %) were aged 50–59 years and 381 (67.3 %) had received higher education. 238 participants (42.1 %) had heard about genomic testing; 122 (21.6 %) were informed of their eligibility for testing, and 104 (18.4 %) were given reasons for the test. The majority (N = 479; 84.6 %) felt they lacked sufficient information to decide, and only 139 (24.6 %) opted for testing. Overall, 246 (43.5 %) wanted more information on additional testing and 234 (41.3 %) wanted more information on treatment options. The main information sources were medical professionals (N = 363; 64.1 %) and the internet (N = 351; 62.0 %). However, 398 participants (70.3 %) indicated that their healthcare professionals did not advise them on where to find more information.

Conclusions

This study highlights insufficient awareness of, and access to, genomic testing in breast cancer. Healthcare professionals need to improve communication with patients regarding genomic testing and involve them in shared decision-making. Likewise, patient associations have a role in providing clear information to patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Breast
Breast 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
165
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Breast is an international, multidisciplinary journal for researchers and clinicians, which focuses on translational and clinical research for the advancement of breast cancer prevention, diagnosis and treatment of all stages.
期刊最新文献
Awareness of genomic testing among patients with breast cancer in Europe The relationship between decision regret, quality of life, and mindfulness in early-stage breast cancer survivors A composite 18F-FDG PET/CT and HER2 tissue-based biomarker to predict response to neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer (TBCRC026) Innovations in the localization techniques for non-palpable breast lesions: Make invisible visible Antibody-drug conjugates in elderly patients with breast cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1