Developing a regulatory framework for multiple participation in energy communities: Insights from Austria

IF 7.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Energy Strategy Reviews Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.esr.2025.101672
Lia Gruber, Thomas Klatzer, Sonja Wogrin
{"title":"Developing a regulatory framework for multiple participation in energy communities: Insights from Austria","authors":"Lia Gruber,&nbsp;Thomas Klatzer,&nbsp;Sonja Wogrin","doi":"10.1016/j.esr.2025.101672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>For completing the energy transition, ordinary citizens have to be able to participate. This can be achieved with energy communities (ECs), which are getting implemented in EU member states. However, some of these legislations do not account for the possible challenges of implementing ECs. One example is Austrian law, which - in an attempt to take citizen involvement one step further - allows for simultaneous participation in multiple ECs. However, the law does not state how energy should be allocated among the members of these ECs, which opens the door to ambiguities that could lead to difficulties in energy allocation among ECs. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate the study that closed this regulation gap by analyzing different methods of energy allocation in ECs with multiple participation. Four algorithms are developed and tested on solvability, complexity, comprehensibility, fairness and predictability. Only one algorithm has proven successful in all categories: the preference coefficient. Here, a preprocessing stage is included, in which each member must declare what percentage of consumption/generation goes to the multiple ECs in which they participate. Therefore, energy allocation in all ECs may be done in parallel without being dependent on the allocation results of other ECs. Based on the study presented this algorithm was implemented for the regulation of multiple participation in ECs in Austria.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11546,"journal":{"name":"Energy Strategy Reviews","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 101672"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Strategy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X25000355","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For completing the energy transition, ordinary citizens have to be able to participate. This can be achieved with energy communities (ECs), which are getting implemented in EU member states. However, some of these legislations do not account for the possible challenges of implementing ECs. One example is Austrian law, which - in an attempt to take citizen involvement one step further - allows for simultaneous participation in multiple ECs. However, the law does not state how energy should be allocated among the members of these ECs, which opens the door to ambiguities that could lead to difficulties in energy allocation among ECs. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate the study that closed this regulation gap by analyzing different methods of energy allocation in ECs with multiple participation. Four algorithms are developed and tested on solvability, complexity, comprehensibility, fairness and predictability. Only one algorithm has proven successful in all categories: the preference coefficient. Here, a preprocessing stage is included, in which each member must declare what percentage of consumption/generation goes to the multiple ECs in which they participate. Therefore, energy allocation in all ECs may be done in parallel without being dependent on the allocation results of other ECs. Based on the study presented this algorithm was implemented for the regulation of multiple participation in ECs in Austria.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Strategy Reviews
Energy Strategy Reviews Energy-Energy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
167
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Strategy Reviews is a gold open access journal that provides authoritative content on strategic decision-making and vision-sharing related to society''s energy needs. Energy Strategy Reviews publishes: • Analyses • Methodologies • Case Studies • Reviews And by invitation: • Report Reviews • Viewpoints
期刊最新文献
Impact of environmental factors on photovoltaic system performance degradation Research on the resilience of petroleum industry chain and supply chain network from the perspective of China Two-step price mechanism using Newton-Raphson method and peer-to-peer mediation for local electricity markets How growth, urbanization, and energy consumption affect CO2 emissions in Saudi Arabia (1970–2020)? An ARDL and NARDL approach to investigate the eco-environmental challenge Enhancing the enviro-economic viability of biogas-solar hybrid systems: Strategies for sustainable energy development in Iran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1