Antidepressant treatment of depression in children and adolescents: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-08 DOI:10.1007/s00787-025-02688-8
Yuan Zhang, Yiyuan Gao, Xuelian Li, Yazhu Zou, Yu Ye, Zhili Zou
{"title":"Antidepressant treatment of depression in children and adolescents: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.","authors":"Yuan Zhang, Yiyuan Gao, Xuelian Li, Yazhu Zou, Yu Ye, Zhili Zou","doi":"10.1007/s00787-025-02688-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pediatric major depressive disorder (MDD) often leads to recurrent depression in adulthood. The efficacy, safety and dose dependency of pharmacological effect is unclear. We conducted a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis comprising of 22 double-blind randomized controlled trials, the majority of which had short trial durations ranging from 6 to 12 weeks. Studies were identified from PubMed, Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline, Ovid PsycInfo, Wanfang, ClinicalTrial.gov and CENTRAL until July 31, 2023. Doses of all antidepressants were converted to fluoxetine equivalents. Outcomes including treatment response, remission, suicidality, tolerability and acceptability were assessed. Sensitivity analysis, funnel plot and the trim-and fill method are used to assess and adjust for publication bias. Findings revealed that antidepressants were marginally more effective than placebos in terms of treatment response, but significantly increased the risk of adverse effects. No significant differences were observed in remission, suicidality, or overall dropout rates. Dose-response analysis indicated a relatively flat increase in response probability with higher fluoxetine equivalent doses, but also a sharp increase risk of discontinuation due to side effects. This study suggests that antidepressants for pediatric MDD may be less effective in adults, emphasizing the need to balance treatment benefits with potential adverse effects when considering interventions for this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":11856,"journal":{"name":"European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"1979-1990"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-025-02688-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pediatric major depressive disorder (MDD) often leads to recurrent depression in adulthood. The efficacy, safety and dose dependency of pharmacological effect is unclear. We conducted a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis comprising of 22 double-blind randomized controlled trials, the majority of which had short trial durations ranging from 6 to 12 weeks. Studies were identified from PubMed, Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline, Ovid PsycInfo, Wanfang, ClinicalTrial.gov and CENTRAL until July 31, 2023. Doses of all antidepressants were converted to fluoxetine equivalents. Outcomes including treatment response, remission, suicidality, tolerability and acceptability were assessed. Sensitivity analysis, funnel plot and the trim-and fill method are used to assess and adjust for publication bias. Findings revealed that antidepressants were marginally more effective than placebos in terms of treatment response, but significantly increased the risk of adverse effects. No significant differences were observed in remission, suicidality, or overall dropout rates. Dose-response analysis indicated a relatively flat increase in response probability with higher fluoxetine equivalent doses, but also a sharp increase risk of discontinuation due to side effects. This study suggests that antidepressants for pediatric MDD may be less effective in adults, emphasizing the need to balance treatment benefits with potential adverse effects when considering interventions for this population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童和青少年抑郁症的抗抑郁药物治疗:系统回顾和剂量反应荟萃分析。
儿童重度抑郁症(MDD)经常导致成年期复发性抑郁症。药理作用的有效性、安全性和剂量依赖性尚不清楚。我们进行了系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析,包括22项双盲随机对照试验,其中大多数试验持续时间较短,从6到12周不等。研究从PubMed、Ovid Embase、Ovid Medline、Ovid PsycInfo、万方、ClinicalTrial.gov和CENTRAL检索至2023年7月31日。所有抗抑郁药的剂量都转换为氟西汀当量。结果包括治疗反应、缓解、自杀倾向、耐受性和可接受性。敏感性分析、漏斗图和修剪填充法用于评估和调整发表偏倚。研究结果显示,抗抑郁药在治疗反应方面比安慰剂略微有效,但显著增加了不良反应的风险。在缓解、自杀或总体辍学率方面没有观察到显著差异。剂量-反应分析表明,较高的氟西汀当量剂量对反应概率的增加相对平缓,但由于副作用而停药的风险也急剧增加。这项研究表明,抗抑郁药治疗儿童重度抑郁症可能对成人效果较差,强调在考虑对这一人群进行干预时,需要平衡治疗益处和潜在的不良影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.70%
发文量
186
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry is Europe''s only peer-reviewed journal entirely devoted to child and adolescent psychiatry. It aims to further a broad understanding of psychopathology in children and adolescents. Empirical research is its foundation, and clinical relevance is its hallmark. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry welcomes in particular papers covering neuropsychiatry, cognitive neuroscience, genetics, neuroimaging, pharmacology, and related fields of interest. Contributions are encouraged from all around the world.
期刊最新文献
Nutrient patterns in children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: a case-control study. Neural responses to error in youth: the impact of social context, anxiety, and worry. Multimodal assessment of emotion regulation in children of parents with a mental illness. Age, sex, and ethnic differences in substance use and/or substance use disorders among runaway and homeless youth: A meta-analysis and meta-regression. Correction: Development of self-esteem from childhood to adolescence in children at Familial high-risk of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1