Co-Production of the 'My SJS Passport' to Support Survivors of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS) Post Diagnosis and Beyond - A Proof of Concept Study.

IF 3.7 4区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Clinical and Experimental Dermatology Pub Date : 2025-03-08 DOI:10.1093/ced/llaf088
Anita Hanson, Lucy Hampson, Jane Evely, Maria Hill, Nathan Elsdon, Thermutis Nadier Lawson, Jane Burns, Daniel F Carr, Andrew Thompson, Jennifer Downing, Munir Pirmohamed
{"title":"Co-Production of the 'My SJS Passport' to Support Survivors of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS) Post Diagnosis and Beyond - A Proof of Concept Study.","authors":"Anita Hanson, Lucy Hampson, Jane Evely, Maria Hill, Nathan Elsdon, Thermutis Nadier Lawson, Jane Burns, Daniel F Carr, Andrew Thompson, Jennifer Downing, Munir Pirmohamed","doi":"10.1093/ced/llaf088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) are life-threatening reactions that cause blistering of the skin and mucous membranes. Survivors can experience long term physical and psychological complications. The 'My SJS Passport' was co-produced by the Patient and Public Involvement group and research team at the Wolfson Centre for Personalised Medicine to improve the care and experiences of survivors.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study was to implement the 'My SJS Passport' in a real-world setting for evaluation by those with lived experience of SJS/TEN. The objectives were to assess participant's perceptions of its acceptability and utility when used during appointments with healthcare professionals and to explore participants' perceptions of its value and potential barriers to implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A proof-of-concept study to evaluate the acceptability and usability of the passport using a mixed methods approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A questionnaire was completed by 19 (86.4%) females and 3 (13.6%) males, while 11/22 participated focus groups. Findings suggest the passport a valuable communication tool, as it acted as the 'patient's voice' and helped in validating diagnosis with healthcare professionals, family and friends.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study provides the first formal evaluation of the passport and showed that the tool is acceptable, functional and of benefit to the user. Minor barriers to implementation were identified, largely due to the COVID-19 pandemic and, to a lesser extent, the passport design. There is no comparable tool in use; thus, based on these preliminary findings, it is thought that the passport has a valuable role in supporting this underserved population.</p>","PeriodicalId":10324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ced/llaf088","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) are life-threatening reactions that cause blistering of the skin and mucous membranes. Survivors can experience long term physical and psychological complications. The 'My SJS Passport' was co-produced by the Patient and Public Involvement group and research team at the Wolfson Centre for Personalised Medicine to improve the care and experiences of survivors.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to implement the 'My SJS Passport' in a real-world setting for evaluation by those with lived experience of SJS/TEN. The objectives were to assess participant's perceptions of its acceptability and utility when used during appointments with healthcare professionals and to explore participants' perceptions of its value and potential barriers to implementation.

Methods: A proof-of-concept study to evaluate the acceptability and usability of the passport using a mixed methods approach.

Results: A questionnaire was completed by 19 (86.4%) females and 3 (13.6%) males, while 11/22 participated focus groups. Findings suggest the passport a valuable communication tool, as it acted as the 'patient's voice' and helped in validating diagnosis with healthcare professionals, family and friends.

Conclusion: The study provides the first formal evaluation of the passport and showed that the tool is acceptable, functional and of benefit to the user. Minor barriers to implementation were identified, largely due to the COVID-19 pandemic and, to a lesser extent, the passport design. There is no comparable tool in use; thus, based on these preliminary findings, it is thought that the passport has a valuable role in supporting this underserved population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
2.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Dermatology (CED) is a unique provider of relevant and educational material for practising clinicians and dermatological researchers. We support continuing professional development (CPD) of dermatology specialists to advance the understanding, management and treatment of skin disease in order to improve patient outcomes.
期刊最新文献
A suspicious nodule in a toe web space. Chromoblastomycosis: a case series from Sumba, eastern Indonesia. Co-Production of the 'My SJS Passport' to Support Survivors of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS) Post Diagnosis and Beyond - A Proof of Concept Study. Pyoderma gangrenosum with extracutaneous involvement: a systematic review. General dermatology and dermatology in primary healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1