Assessment of punctal metrics and tear meniscus height in epiphora: clinical insights and diagnostic potential.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-03-08 DOI:10.1007/s10384-025-01182-7
Neslihan Sevimli, Ece İren, Güneş Taydaş, Muhammed Kaan Azarbaz
{"title":"Assessment of punctal metrics and tear meniscus height in epiphora: clinical insights and diagnostic potential.","authors":"Neslihan Sevimli, Ece İren, Güneş Taydaş, Muhammed Kaan Azarbaz","doi":"10.1007/s10384-025-01182-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To use anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) to investigate differences in punctal dimensions, tear meniscus height (TMH), and cornea among epiphora patients and healthy individuals; to assess its utility in screening and diagnosing epiphora; and to examine its effects on the cornea.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective, cross-sectional METHODS: A total of 43 patients (31 women) with epiphora (Munk score >2) and 58 healthy individuals (38 women) without ocular symptoms were enrolled in this study. AS-OCT (Maestro, Topcon) was used to measure TMH, outer punctal diameter (OPD), punctal depth (PD), and corneal epithelial thickness (CET). Corneal topography (Pentacam, Oculus) was used to assess corneal topographic parameters and corneal volume (CV). Correlations among OPD, TMH, and corneal parameters were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found in age and sex among the groups (P = .909 and P = .482, respectively). Patients with epiphora exhibited significantly narrower OPD (229.6 ± 150.1 μm) and higher TMH (592.5 ± 315.3 μm) (both P <.001). CV was notably lower in the epiphora group (P = .015). The lower cutoff of OPD for epiphora was found to be 200 μm, and the lower cutoff of TMH for epiphora, 445 μm. Positive correlations were observed between OPD and CV (P = .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with epiphora demonstrated narrower OPD, higher TMH, and lower CV than those of healthy individuals. These findings highlight the utility of AS-OCT in assessing epiphora and its effects on corneal health.</p>","PeriodicalId":14563,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-025-01182-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To use anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) to investigate differences in punctal dimensions, tear meniscus height (TMH), and cornea among epiphora patients and healthy individuals; to assess its utility in screening and diagnosing epiphora; and to examine its effects on the cornea.

Study design: Prospective, cross-sectional METHODS: A total of 43 patients (31 women) with epiphora (Munk score >2) and 58 healthy individuals (38 women) without ocular symptoms were enrolled in this study. AS-OCT (Maestro, Topcon) was used to measure TMH, outer punctal diameter (OPD), punctal depth (PD), and corneal epithelial thickness (CET). Corneal topography (Pentacam, Oculus) was used to assess corneal topographic parameters and corneal volume (CV). Correlations among OPD, TMH, and corneal parameters were analyzed.

Results: No significant differences were found in age and sex among the groups (P = .909 and P = .482, respectively). Patients with epiphora exhibited significantly narrower OPD (229.6 ± 150.1 μm) and higher TMH (592.5 ± 315.3 μm) (both P <.001). CV was notably lower in the epiphora group (P = .015). The lower cutoff of OPD for epiphora was found to be 200 μm, and the lower cutoff of TMH for epiphora, 445 μm. Positive correlations were observed between OPD and CV (P = .001).

Conclusions: Patients with epiphora demonstrated narrower OPD, higher TMH, and lower CV than those of healthy individuals. These findings highlight the utility of AS-OCT in assessing epiphora and its effects on corneal health.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
65
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology (JJO) was inaugurated in 1957 as a quarterly journal published in English by the Ophthalmology Department of the University of Tokyo, with the aim of disseminating the achievements of Japanese ophthalmologists worldwide. JJO remains the only Japanese ophthalmology journal published in English. In 1997, the Japanese Ophthalmological Society assumed the responsibility for publishing the Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology as its official English-language publication. Currently the journal is published bimonthly and accepts papers from authors worldwide. JJO has become an international interdisciplinary forum for the publication of basic science and clinical research papers.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of punctal metrics and tear meniscus height in epiphora: clinical insights and diagnostic potential. Real-world practice patterns for dry eye diagnosis: a multicenter observational study in Taiwan. Study protocol for a prospective natural history registry investigating the relationships between inflammatory markers and disease progression in retinitis pigmentosa: the RP-PRIMARY study. Autologous retina transplantation for refractory highly myopic macular holes: a long-term follow-up. Corneal Fourier harmonic analysis in prostaglandin-associated periorbitopathy patients with blepharoptosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1