{"title":"A framework for constructing impossible differential distinguishers and its applications","authors":"Wenya Li, Kai Zhang, Bin Hu","doi":"10.1007/s10623-025-01588-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Internet of Things (IoT) has become a necessary part of modern technology, enabling devices to connect and interact with each other. Unless applicable cryptographic components have adequate security protection, the IoT could easily leak private data. Impossible differential cryptanalysis (IDC) is one of the best-known techniques for cryptanalysis of block ciphers. Several papers are aimed at formalizing the IDC and constructing impossible differentials (IDs) automatically. In 2003, Kim et al. proposed a framework for searching IDs, namely the <span>\\(\\mathcal {U}\\)</span>-method. Luo et al. improved it and presented the UID-method in 2009. The two methods target word-oriented block ciphers. In this paper, we present a framework for constructing impossible differential distinguishers without a matrix, called the<span>\\(\\mathcal {K}\\)</span>3.2 framework. This framework has a wider application on block ciphers than the <span>\\(\\mathcal {U}\\)</span>-method, which works on the cipher with a certain property. In particular, the <span>\\(\\mathcal {K}\\)</span>3.2 framework employs fewer variables than the <span>\\(\\mathcal {U}\\)</span>-method and the UID-method. Furthermore, we present 10 applications on block ciphers and structures. For an IoT cipher, ALLPC, we find the full-round IDs and two longer IDs with five more rounds than full rounds. We find some new results for two ISO standard ciphers. For SKINNY, considering single-key and single-tweakey, we discover the ID with one more round than the previous result. For CLEFIA, we find two new IDs with the length of the previous longest IDs. For LBlock, TWINE, Feistel, Gen-RC6, Gen-Skipjack, Gen-CAST256, and SMS4, we rediscover the known IDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":11130,"journal":{"name":"Designs, Codes and Cryptography","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Designs, Codes and Cryptography","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10623-025-01588-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Internet of Things (IoT) has become a necessary part of modern technology, enabling devices to connect and interact with each other. Unless applicable cryptographic components have adequate security protection, the IoT could easily leak private data. Impossible differential cryptanalysis (IDC) is one of the best-known techniques for cryptanalysis of block ciphers. Several papers are aimed at formalizing the IDC and constructing impossible differentials (IDs) automatically. In 2003, Kim et al. proposed a framework for searching IDs, namely the \(\mathcal {U}\)-method. Luo et al. improved it and presented the UID-method in 2009. The two methods target word-oriented block ciphers. In this paper, we present a framework for constructing impossible differential distinguishers without a matrix, called the\(\mathcal {K}\)3.2 framework. This framework has a wider application on block ciphers than the \(\mathcal {U}\)-method, which works on the cipher with a certain property. In particular, the \(\mathcal {K}\)3.2 framework employs fewer variables than the \(\mathcal {U}\)-method and the UID-method. Furthermore, we present 10 applications on block ciphers and structures. For an IoT cipher, ALLPC, we find the full-round IDs and two longer IDs with five more rounds than full rounds. We find some new results for two ISO standard ciphers. For SKINNY, considering single-key and single-tweakey, we discover the ID with one more round than the previous result. For CLEFIA, we find two new IDs with the length of the previous longest IDs. For LBlock, TWINE, Feistel, Gen-RC6, Gen-Skipjack, Gen-CAST256, and SMS4, we rediscover the known IDs.
期刊介绍:
Designs, Codes and Cryptography is an archival peer-reviewed technical journal publishing original research papers in the designated areas. There is a great deal of activity in design theory, coding theory and cryptography, including a substantial amount of research which brings together more than one of the subjects. While many journals exist for each of the individual areas, few encourage the interaction of the disciplines.
The journal was founded to meet the needs of mathematicians, engineers and computer scientists working in these areas, whose interests extend beyond the bounds of any one of the individual disciplines. The journal provides a forum for high quality research in its three areas, with papers touching more than one of the areas especially welcome.
The journal also considers high quality submissions in the closely related areas of finite fields and finite geometries, which provide important tools for both the construction and the actual application of designs, codes and cryptographic systems. In particular, it includes (mostly theoretical) papers on computational aspects of finite fields. It also considers topics in sequence design, which frequently admit equivalent formulations in the journal’s main areas.
Designs, Codes and Cryptography is mathematically oriented, emphasizing the algebraic and geometric aspects of the areas it covers. The journal considers high quality papers of both a theoretical and a practical nature, provided they contain a substantial amount of mathematics.