Optimized gravity field retrieval for the MAGIC mission concept using background model uncertainty information

IF 3.9 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Journal of Geodesy Pub Date : 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1007/s00190-024-01931-5
Josefine Wilms, Markus Hauk, Natalia Panafidina, Michael Murböck, Karl Hans Neumayer, Christoph Dahle, Frank Flechtner
{"title":"Optimized gravity field retrieval for the MAGIC mission concept using background model uncertainty information","authors":"Josefine Wilms, Markus Hauk, Natalia Panafidina, Michael Murböck, Karl Hans Neumayer, Christoph Dahle, Frank Flechtner","doi":"10.1007/s00190-024-01931-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Errors in ocean tide and non-tidal atmospheric and oceanic models are among the largest error sources in gravity field recovery from space. We co-estimate corrections to these background models subject to uncertainty constraints during the adjustment procedure of gravity field spherical harmonic coefficients. Simulations are performed for the Mass-Change and Geoscience International Constellation to evaluate the effect of such a constrained procedure on monthly gravity field retrievals for the planned ESA-NASA double-pair mission. The influence of co-estimating background model corrections subject to known uncertainty information is evaluated separately for both types of background models and is then combined and used to retrieve monthly gravity fields over one year. Retrieval errors are compared to those obtained with the standard recovery procedure, which neglects these corrections. It is shown that gravity field retrieval errors are reduced by up to 36%. In addition, the one-year simulation is used to estimate residual corrections for eight major tidal constituents in order to improve ocean tide background modelling. Adding these residual corrections to the applied a priori ocean tide model shows that ocean tide errors are decreased by up to 27%.</p>","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"212 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geodesy","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01931-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Errors in ocean tide and non-tidal atmospheric and oceanic models are among the largest error sources in gravity field recovery from space. We co-estimate corrections to these background models subject to uncertainty constraints during the adjustment procedure of gravity field spherical harmonic coefficients. Simulations are performed for the Mass-Change and Geoscience International Constellation to evaluate the effect of such a constrained procedure on monthly gravity field retrievals for the planned ESA-NASA double-pair mission. The influence of co-estimating background model corrections subject to known uncertainty information is evaluated separately for both types of background models and is then combined and used to retrieve monthly gravity fields over one year. Retrieval errors are compared to those obtained with the standard recovery procedure, which neglects these corrections. It is shown that gravity field retrieval errors are reduced by up to 36%. In addition, the one-year simulation is used to estimate residual corrections for eight major tidal constituents in order to improve ocean tide background modelling. Adding these residual corrections to the applied a priori ocean tide model shows that ocean tide errors are decreased by up to 27%.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geodesy
Journal of Geodesy 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
85
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geodesy is an international journal concerned with the study of scientific problems of geodesy and related interdisciplinary sciences. Peer-reviewed papers are published on theoretical or modeling studies, and on results of experiments and interpretations. Besides original research papers, the journal includes commissioned review papers on topical subjects and special issues arising from chosen scientific symposia or workshops. The journal covers the whole range of geodetic science and reports on theoretical and applied studies in research areas such as: -Positioning -Reference frame -Geodetic networks -Modeling and quality control -Space geodesy -Remote sensing -Gravity fields -Geodynamics
期刊最新文献
Optimized gravity field retrieval for the MAGIC mission concept using background model uncertainty information Stochastic modelling of polyhedral gravity signal variations. Part I: First-order derivatives of gravitational potential Handling temporal correlated noise in large-scale global GNSS processing IAG newsletter Downscaling GRACE-derived ocean bottom pressure anomalies using self-supervised data fusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1