Shejil Kumar, Mawson Wang, Albert S Kim, Jacqueline R Center, Michelle M Mcdonald, Christian M Girgis
{"title":"Denosumab discontinuation in the clinic: implications of rebound bone turnover and emerging strategies to prevent bone loss and fractures.","authors":"Shejil Kumar, Mawson Wang, Albert S Kim, Jacqueline R Center, Michelle M Mcdonald, Christian M Girgis","doi":"10.1093/jbmr/zjaf037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Denosumab is a highly effective treatment for osteoporosis, and its long-term use is associated with incremental gains in bone mineral density (BMD) and sustained fracture risk reduction. Stopping denosumab, however, results in rebound increase in bone turnover, loss of treatment-associated BMD gains, and in the worst case, spontaneous vertebral fractures (VFs). Insights into the risk factors and the underlying mechanisms for rebound-associated bone loss and true incidence of rebound VFs are emerging. Conventional strategies using bisphosphonates to mitigate post-denosumab rebound display mixed success. Bisphosphonates may preserve bone density following short-term denosumab but the optimal sequential approach after longer-term denosumab remains elusive. Patients at particular risk of are those with prevalent VFs or greater on-treatment BMD gains. To greater understand these risks and strategies to preserve bone after denosumab, an emerging body of translational and pre-clinical work is shedding new light on the biology of RANKL inhibition and withdrawal. Discovering an effective \"exit strategy\" to control rebound bone turnover and avoid bone loss after denosumab will improve confidence amongst patients and clinicians in this highly effective and otherwise safe treatment for osteoporosis. This perspective characterizes the clinical problem of post-denosumab rebound, provides a comprehensive update on human studies examining the use of bisphosphonates following denosumab and explores mechanistic insights from pre-clinical studies that will be critical in the design of definitive human trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":185,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Mineral Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Mineral Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbmr/zjaf037","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Denosumab is a highly effective treatment for osteoporosis, and its long-term use is associated with incremental gains in bone mineral density (BMD) and sustained fracture risk reduction. Stopping denosumab, however, results in rebound increase in bone turnover, loss of treatment-associated BMD gains, and in the worst case, spontaneous vertebral fractures (VFs). Insights into the risk factors and the underlying mechanisms for rebound-associated bone loss and true incidence of rebound VFs are emerging. Conventional strategies using bisphosphonates to mitigate post-denosumab rebound display mixed success. Bisphosphonates may preserve bone density following short-term denosumab but the optimal sequential approach after longer-term denosumab remains elusive. Patients at particular risk of are those with prevalent VFs or greater on-treatment BMD gains. To greater understand these risks and strategies to preserve bone after denosumab, an emerging body of translational and pre-clinical work is shedding new light on the biology of RANKL inhibition and withdrawal. Discovering an effective "exit strategy" to control rebound bone turnover and avoid bone loss after denosumab will improve confidence amongst patients and clinicians in this highly effective and otherwise safe treatment for osteoporosis. This perspective characterizes the clinical problem of post-denosumab rebound, provides a comprehensive update on human studies examining the use of bisphosphonates following denosumab and explores mechanistic insights from pre-clinical studies that will be critical in the design of definitive human trials.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Bone and Mineral Research (JBMR) publishes highly impactful original manuscripts, reviews, and special articles on basic, translational and clinical investigations relevant to the musculoskeletal system and mineral metabolism. Specifically, the journal is interested in original research on the biology and physiology of skeletal tissues, interdisciplinary research spanning the musculoskeletal and other systems, including but not limited to immunology, hematology, energy metabolism, cancer biology, and neurology, and systems biology topics using large scale “-omics” approaches. The journal welcomes clinical research on the pathophysiology, treatment and prevention of osteoporosis and fractures, as well as sarcopenia, disorders of bone and mineral metabolism, and rare or genetically determined bone diseases.