Survey sabotage: Insights into reducing the risk of fraudulent responses in online surveys

IF 4.7 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Anatomical Sciences Education Pub Date : 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1002/ase.70015
James Bonnamy, Bethany Carr, Michelle D. Lazarus, Clifford Connell
{"title":"Survey sabotage: Insights into reducing the risk of fraudulent responses in online surveys","authors":"James Bonnamy,&nbsp;Bethany Carr,&nbsp;Michelle D. Lazarus,&nbsp;Clifford Connell","doi":"10.1002/ase.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Validity is a key element of many forms of research—particularly surveys, which are often used in health professions education research. A survey must accurately measure what it is intended to measure to be considered valid. This is becoming increasingly difficult in the age of artificial intelligence (AI), where “bots” (short for robots) are challenging researchers' abilities to deliver valid surveys. While financial incentives were once considered the gold standard method for survey recruitment and participant reimbursement, emerging technologies help bad actors in taking advantage of these incentives, jeopardizing the validity of survey research. In this short communication, we share a case study illustrating how online surveys can be sabotaged by bad actors. We aim to expand researchers' awareness of this challenge to survey validity and offer guidance to maximize their ability to deliver psychometrically valid surveys in health professions education research.</p>","PeriodicalId":124,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Sciences Education","volume":"18 8","pages":"767-773"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ase.70015","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomical Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ase.70015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Validity is a key element of many forms of research—particularly surveys, which are often used in health professions education research. A survey must accurately measure what it is intended to measure to be considered valid. This is becoming increasingly difficult in the age of artificial intelligence (AI), where “bots” (short for robots) are challenging researchers' abilities to deliver valid surveys. While financial incentives were once considered the gold standard method for survey recruitment and participant reimbursement, emerging technologies help bad actors in taking advantage of these incentives, jeopardizing the validity of survey research. In this short communication, we share a case study illustrating how online surveys can be sabotaged by bad actors. We aim to expand researchers' awareness of this challenge to survey validity and offer guidance to maximize their ability to deliver psychometrically valid surveys in health professions education research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查破坏:降低在线调查中欺诈反应风险的见解。
有效性是许多研究形式的关键要素,尤其是调查,它经常用于卫生专业教育研究。一项调查必须准确地测量它想要测量的东西,才能被认为是有效的。在人工智能(AI)时代,这变得越来越困难,“机器人”(简称机器人)正在挑战研究人员提供有效调查的能力。虽然经济激励曾经被认为是调查招募和参与者报销的黄金标准方法,但新兴技术帮助不良行为者利用这些激励措施,危及调查研究的有效性。在这个简短的交流中,我们分享一个案例研究,说明在线调查是如何被坏人破坏的。我们的目标是扩大研究人员对调查效度挑战的认识,并提供指导,以最大限度地提高他们在卫生专业教育研究中提供心理测量学有效调查的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anatomical Sciences Education
Anatomical Sciences Education Anatomy/education-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
39.70%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Anatomical Sciences Education, affiliated with the American Association for Anatomy, serves as an international platform for sharing ideas, innovations, and research related to education in anatomical sciences. Covering gross anatomy, embryology, histology, and neurosciences, the journal addresses education at various levels, including undergraduate, graduate, post-graduate, allied health, medical (both allopathic and osteopathic), and dental. It fosters collaboration and discussion in the field of anatomical sciences education.
期刊最新文献
NeuroTwister: Gamified learning to teach cross-sectional neuroanatomy to medical students. The current status of body donation in China and the influences of traditional culture: A systematic review. Preliminary insights on high-fidelity embalming solutions for surgical skills training-An evaluation using the McMaster Embalming Scale and mechanical tests. A systematic review and meta-analysis of pedagogical trends and impact in neuroanatomy education. A multimodal curriculum with integrated gamification helps reduce neurophobia in medical students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1