Meta-analysis to determine the effects of supplementation of niacin during the transition or lactation period on performance in dairy cows

IF 4.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Journal of Dairy Science Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-05 DOI:10.3168/jds.2024-25902
U. Arshad , S. Bagaria , C.M. Ncho , M. Sagheer , K. Krogstad , M. Niu
{"title":"Meta-analysis to determine the effects of supplementation of niacin during the transition or lactation period on performance in dairy cows","authors":"U. Arshad ,&nbsp;S. Bagaria ,&nbsp;C.M. Ncho ,&nbsp;M. Sagheer ,&nbsp;K. Krogstad ,&nbsp;M. Niu","doi":"10.3168/jds.2024-25902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Niacin, a key component of pyridine nucleotides, plays a vital role in over 200 metabolic reactions, including carbohydrate, lipid, and AA metabolism. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of niacin supplementation on lactational performance in dairy cows. We hypothesized that niacin supplementation during the transition or lactation period would enhance the productive performance of dairy cows. A systematic review identified 41 experiments, comprising 128 treatment means and 1,992 cows, which were included in the meta-analysis. Each experiment featured a nonsupplemented control (CON) group and a supplemented group, with niacin provided as either rumen-unprotected niacin (RUPN) or rumen-protected niacin (RPN). Supplementation was initiated during either the transition or lactation period, resulting in the categorization of data into 4 distinct cohorts: cows supplemented with RUPN or RPN during either the transition or lactation period. Cows supplemented with RUPN during the transition (CON; n = 13 treatment means vs. RUPN; n = 14 treatment means) and lactation periods (CON; n = 33 treatment means vs. RUPN; n = 40 treatment means) had average niacin intakes (mean ± SD) of 13.9 ± 10.8 g/d and 9.1 ± 3.5 g/d, respectively. Cows supplemented with RPN during the transition (CON; n = 4 treatment means vs. RPN; n = 4 treatment means) and lactation periods (CON; n = 8 treatment means vs. RPN; n = 12 treatment means) had niacin intakes of 11.7 ± 7.3 g/d and 4.6 ± 2.0 g/d, respectively. Mixed models were used to investigate the linear and quadratic effects of RUPN or RPN. Meta-analytical statistics in STATA estimated the weighted mean difference (WMD) of milk yield for treatment comparisons (CON vs. RUPN and CON vs. RPN). All models included the random effect of experiment and weighting by the inverse of the SEM squared. Supplementation of niacin, whether RUPN or RPN, during the transition period did not improve performance in dairy cows. However, RUPN supplementation during the regular lactation period led to linear increases in DMI, yields of milk, ECM, protein and lactose, and increments of 0.50, 0.90, 0.70, 0.04, and 0.05 kg/d, respectively, were observed when cows were supplemented with 9.1 g/d RUPN. In 38 treatment comparisons from 20 experiments evaluating RUPN supplementation during the lactation period, the mean response indicated that RUPN cows produced 0.83 kg/d more milk than CON cows (WMD = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.35–1.31), with moderate (<em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 61.7%) heterogeneity observed. Similarly, RPN supplementation during the lactation period led to linear increases in DMI and yields of milk, ECM, fat and lactose, with respective increases of 0.60, 1.10, 0.70, 0.06, and 0.05 kg/d when cows were supplemented with 4.7 g/d niacin. Across 12 treatment comparisons from 8 experiments, RPN-supplemented cows produced 0.96 kg/d more milk than CON cows (WMD = 0.96; 95% CI = 0.62–1.31), with no heterogeneity observed. Overall, feeding 9.1 g/d of niacin from RUPN or 4.7 g/d of niacin from RPN during the lactation period improved milk production without improving feed efficiency in dairy cows.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":354,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dairy Science","volume":"108 4","pages":"Pages 3627-3644"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dairy Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030225000815","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Niacin, a key component of pyridine nucleotides, plays a vital role in over 200 metabolic reactions, including carbohydrate, lipid, and AA metabolism. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of niacin supplementation on lactational performance in dairy cows. We hypothesized that niacin supplementation during the transition or lactation period would enhance the productive performance of dairy cows. A systematic review identified 41 experiments, comprising 128 treatment means and 1,992 cows, which were included in the meta-analysis. Each experiment featured a nonsupplemented control (CON) group and a supplemented group, with niacin provided as either rumen-unprotected niacin (RUPN) or rumen-protected niacin (RPN). Supplementation was initiated during either the transition or lactation period, resulting in the categorization of data into 4 distinct cohorts: cows supplemented with RUPN or RPN during either the transition or lactation period. Cows supplemented with RUPN during the transition (CON; n = 13 treatment means vs. RUPN; n = 14 treatment means) and lactation periods (CON; n = 33 treatment means vs. RUPN; n = 40 treatment means) had average niacin intakes (mean ± SD) of 13.9 ± 10.8 g/d and 9.1 ± 3.5 g/d, respectively. Cows supplemented with RPN during the transition (CON; n = 4 treatment means vs. RPN; n = 4 treatment means) and lactation periods (CON; n = 8 treatment means vs. RPN; n = 12 treatment means) had niacin intakes of 11.7 ± 7.3 g/d and 4.6 ± 2.0 g/d, respectively. Mixed models were used to investigate the linear and quadratic effects of RUPN or RPN. Meta-analytical statistics in STATA estimated the weighted mean difference (WMD) of milk yield for treatment comparisons (CON vs. RUPN and CON vs. RPN). All models included the random effect of experiment and weighting by the inverse of the SEM squared. Supplementation of niacin, whether RUPN or RPN, during the transition period did not improve performance in dairy cows. However, RUPN supplementation during the regular lactation period led to linear increases in DMI, yields of milk, ECM, protein and lactose, and increments of 0.50, 0.90, 0.70, 0.04, and 0.05 kg/d, respectively, were observed when cows were supplemented with 9.1 g/d RUPN. In 38 treatment comparisons from 20 experiments evaluating RUPN supplementation during the lactation period, the mean response indicated that RUPN cows produced 0.83 kg/d more milk than CON cows (WMD = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.35–1.31), with moderate (I2 = 61.7%) heterogeneity observed. Similarly, RPN supplementation during the lactation period led to linear increases in DMI and yields of milk, ECM, fat and lactose, with respective increases of 0.60, 1.10, 0.70, 0.06, and 0.05 kg/d when cows were supplemented with 4.7 g/d niacin. Across 12 treatment comparisons from 8 experiments, RPN-supplemented cows produced 0.96 kg/d more milk than CON cows (WMD = 0.96; 95% CI = 0.62–1.31), with no heterogeneity observed. Overall, feeding 9.1 g/d of niacin from RUPN or 4.7 g/d of niacin from RPN during the lactation period improved milk production without improving feed efficiency in dairy cows.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过荟萃分析确定过渡期或哺乳期补充烟酸对奶牛生产性能的影响。
烟酸是吡啶核苷酸的重要组成部分,在200多种代谢反应中起着至关重要的作用,包括碳水化合物、脂质和AA代谢。本荟萃分析旨在评价烟酸添加对奶牛泌乳性能的影响。我们假设在过渡期或哺乳期补充烟酸可以提高奶牛的生产性能。系统回顾确定了41个实验,包括128种治疗方法和1,992头奶牛,这些实验被纳入meta分析。每个试验分为非补充对照组(CON)和补充组,烟酸分为保护瘤胃烟酸(RUPN)和保护瘤胃烟酸(RPN)两种。在过渡期或哺乳期开始补充,将数据分为4个不同的队列:在过渡期或哺乳期补充RUPN或RPN的奶牛。过渡期添加RUPN的奶牛(CON;n = 13治疗组对照RUPN;n = 14,治疗平均值)和哺乳期(CON;n = 33治疗组对照RUPN;n = 40组,平均烟酸摄入量(mean±SD)分别为13.9±10.8 g/d和9.1±3.5 g/d。过渡期添加RPN的奶牛(CON;n = 4治疗均值vs RPN;n = 4个治疗组)和哺乳期(CON;n = 8治疗均值vs RPN;N = 12组,烟酸摄入量分别为11.7±7.3 g/d和4.6±2.0 g/d。采用混合模型研究了RUPN或RPN的线性和二次效应。STATA的荟萃分析统计估计了处理比较的产奶量加权平均差异(WMD) (CON vs. RUPN和CON vs. RPN)。所有模型均包含实验随机效应和SEM平方逆加权。在过渡时期添加烟酸,无论是来自RUPN还是RPN,都没有提高奶牛的生产性能。然而,在泌乳期添加RUPN可使DMI、产奶量、ECM、蛋白质和乳糖呈线性增加,当奶牛添加9.1 g/d RUPN时,DMI、产奶量、ECM、蛋白质和乳糖分别增加0.50、0.90、0.70、0.04和0.05 kg/d。在20个评估泌乳期添加RUPN的试验中,38个处理对比的平均响应表明,RUPN奶牛的产奶量比对照组奶牛多0.83 kg/d (WMD = 0.83;95% CI = 0.35 ~ 1.31),观察到中度异质性(I2 = 61.7%)。同样,哺乳期添加RPN导致奶牛DMI、产奶量、ECM、脂肪和乳糖呈线性增加,当烟酸添加量为4.7 g/d时,分别增加0.60、1.10、0.70、0.06和0.05 kg/d。在8个试验的12个处理对比中,添加rpn的奶牛产奶量比不添加rpn的奶牛多0.96 kg/d (WMD = 0.96;95% CI = 0.62 ~ 1.31),未观察到异质性。综上所述,在泌乳期饲粮中添加9.1 g/d的酪氨酸烟酸或4.7 g/d的酪氨酸烟酸可以提高奶牛的产奶量,但没有提高饲料效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Dairy Science
Journal of Dairy Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
17.10%
发文量
784
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the American Dairy Science Association®, Journal of Dairy Science® (JDS) is the leading peer-reviewed general dairy research journal in the world. JDS readers represent education, industry, and government agencies in more than 70 countries with interests in biochemistry, breeding, economics, engineering, environment, food science, genetics, microbiology, nutrition, pathology, physiology, processing, public health, quality assurance, and sanitation.
期刊最新文献
Effects of Scutellaria baicalensis extract on inflammatory biomarkers and performance in transition dairy cows. Effects of milk-based media on the centrifugal recovery and counting of Limosilactobacillus. Effect of Plate-and-Frame Filtration Temperature on the Functionality of Milk Protein Concentrate Powder. Effect of increasing monensin supplementation on the performance of lactating dairy cows fed contemporary diets. Effects of the Periparturient Period and Parity on Local Innervation Markers in Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue of Dairy Cows.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1