Knowledge and perception of modern learning approaches in Continuing Medical Education: a cross-sectional study.

IF 1.3 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Annali di igiene : medicina preventiva e di comunita Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-10 DOI:10.7416/ai.2025.2693
Camilla Lugli, Floriana Murani, Claudia Bellini, Ughetta Maria Favazzi, Alfonso Mazzaccara, Marco Vinceti, Tommaso Filippini
{"title":"Knowledge and perception of modern learning approaches in Continuing Medical Education: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Camilla Lugli, Floriana Murani, Claudia Bellini, Ughetta Maria Favazzi, Alfonso Mazzaccara, Marco Vinceti, Tommaso Filippini","doi":"10.7416/ai.2025.2693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuing Medical Education (CME) is essential for enhancing professional performance. Modern CME approaches should prioritize adaptability and engagement through interactive and experiential learning, fostering better knowledge retention, skill application, and innovation to meet evolving healthcare challenges. This study aims to assess knowledge and perceptions of perceived role of engagement and active learning techniques in CME in the Italian population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a pilot study with cross-sectional design among graduate and post-graduate students from the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia in 2023, by administering a 17-item questionnaire about knowledge, and perceptions of CME.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 43 participants (median age 25, 72% females). Role of CME was recognized by 72.1%, and 53.5% were aware of its benefits. Likert responses showed high perceived importance of CME and engagement (mean scores 3.79 and 4.40). Active approaches like simulation (68.3%) and role-playing (65.9%) were familiar, but gamification (36.6%) was far less known.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While methods like simulation, role-playing, case-based learning, and problem-based learning were familiar to study participants for their strong evidence of effectiveness, emerging approaches such as gamification and team-based learning were less known. Such approaches require further implementation in educational programs to show their benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":7999,"journal":{"name":"Annali di igiene : medicina preventiva e di comunita","volume":" ","pages":"488-499"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali di igiene : medicina preventiva e di comunita","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7416/ai.2025.2693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Continuing Medical Education (CME) is essential for enhancing professional performance. Modern CME approaches should prioritize adaptability and engagement through interactive and experiential learning, fostering better knowledge retention, skill application, and innovation to meet evolving healthcare challenges. This study aims to assess knowledge and perceptions of perceived role of engagement and active learning techniques in CME in the Italian population.

Methods: We conducted a pilot study with cross-sectional design among graduate and post-graduate students from the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia in 2023, by administering a 17-item questionnaire about knowledge, and perceptions of CME.

Results: We included 43 participants (median age 25, 72% females). Role of CME was recognized by 72.1%, and 53.5% were aware of its benefits. Likert responses showed high perceived importance of CME and engagement (mean scores 3.79 and 4.40). Active approaches like simulation (68.3%) and role-playing (65.9%) were familiar, but gamification (36.6%) was far less known.

Conclusions: While methods like simulation, role-playing, case-based learning, and problem-based learning were familiar to study participants for their strong evidence of effectiveness, emerging approaches such as gamification and team-based learning were less known. Such approaches require further implementation in educational programs to show their benefits.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
继续医学教育中现代学习方法的知识与认知:一项横断面研究。
背景:继续医学教育(CME)对提高专业绩效至关重要。现代CME方法应该通过互动和体验式学习优先考虑适应性和参与度,促进更好的知识保留、技能应用和创新,以应对不断变化的医疗保健挑战。本研究旨在评估意大利人口对CME中参与和主动学习技术的认知和认知。方法:我们于2023年在摩德纳大学和雷焦艾米利亚大学的研究生和研究生中进行了一项横断面设计的试点研究,通过管理17项关于CME知识和认知的问卷。结果:我们纳入了43名参与者(中位年龄25岁,72%为女性)。72.1%的人认识到CME的作用,53.5%的人意识到CME的好处。李克特反应显示出CME和参与的高度感知重要性(平均得分3.79和4.40)。模拟(68.3%)和角色扮演(65.9%)等主动方法较为常见,但游戏化(36.6%)却鲜为人知。结论:虽然模拟、角色扮演、基于案例的学习和基于问题的学习等方法对研究参与者来说是熟悉的,因为它们具有强有力的有效性证据,但新兴的方法,如游戏化和基于团队的学习却鲜为人知。这种方法需要在教育项目中进一步实施,以显示其好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annali di igiene : medicina preventiva e di comunita
Annali di igiene : medicina preventiva e di comunita HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
期刊最新文献
Action Maze and Role Playing in comparison: A Randomized Field Trial on simulation-based teaching methodologies in critical care. Insect-based novel food: is Italy ready for the food of the future? A survey on entomophagy among Italian people. How's your waiting list? Probing the dual burden: assessing psychological distress and substance use among female sex workers in Sonagachi, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. The association between secondhand smoke exposure and risk of developing active tuberculosis in individuals with latent tuberculosis infection: a systematic literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1