Effects of nutritional supplements and dietary interventions on rheumatoid arthritis: An umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.
Xue-Er Cheng, Xiao Hu, Jian Tang, Qian-Qian Shi, Sheng Li, Yi Sheng He, Man Ge, Jin-Hui Tao, Peng Wang, Hai-Feng Pan
{"title":"Effects of nutritional supplements and dietary interventions on rheumatoid arthritis: An umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Xue-Er Cheng, Xiao Hu, Jian Tang, Qian-Qian Shi, Sheng Li, Yi Sheng He, Man Ge, Jin-Hui Tao, Peng Wang, Hai-Feng Pan","doi":"10.1016/j.autrev.2025.103792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds: </strong>The effects of nutritional supplements and dietary interventions on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are still unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of nutritional supplements and dietary interventions on RA patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The online databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library were used to search the relevant literature from inception to December 2024. Meta-analyses with the inclusion of randomized controlled trials were selected to assess the effects of nutritional supplements or dietary interventions on RA. We accessed the methodological quality of included reviews using AMSTAR 2 and evaluated the quality of evidence for intervention effects using GRADE. Data synthesis and analysis were used by R 4.4.1 and STATA 17.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 articles were included, evaluating the effects of nutritional supplements and dietary interventions on RA management. Among these, 3 studies were rated as high quality, 6 as low quality, and 5 as critically low quality by AMSTAR2. The quality of evidence for intervention effects ranges from low to very low quality. The interventions assessed included polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), probiotics, total glucosides of paeony (TGP), anti-inflammatory diets (AIDs), and others. TGP was the only intervention to significantly reduce both the disease activity score and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, although the quality of evidence for these effects was low. Probiotics contributed to significant reductions in C-reactive protein and visual analogue scale scores, with both outcomes rated as low quality. PUFAs demonstrated significant improvements in tender joint count, swollen joint count, and morning stiffness, though, like the other interventions, these effects were also rated as low quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was relatively strong evidence supporting that PUFAs, probiotics, TGP, and AIDs may show some benefits on RA. However, the low quality of evidence highlights the need for further high-quality research and real-world evidence to confirm their effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":8664,"journal":{"name":"Autoimmunity reviews","volume":" ","pages":"103792"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autoimmunity reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2025.103792","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Backgrounds: The effects of nutritional supplements and dietary interventions on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are still unclear.
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of nutritional supplements and dietary interventions on RA patients.
Methods: The online databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library were used to search the relevant literature from inception to December 2024. Meta-analyses with the inclusion of randomized controlled trials were selected to assess the effects of nutritional supplements or dietary interventions on RA. We accessed the methodological quality of included reviews using AMSTAR 2 and evaluated the quality of evidence for intervention effects using GRADE. Data synthesis and analysis were used by R 4.4.1 and STATA 17.
Results: A total of 14 articles were included, evaluating the effects of nutritional supplements and dietary interventions on RA management. Among these, 3 studies were rated as high quality, 6 as low quality, and 5 as critically low quality by AMSTAR2. The quality of evidence for intervention effects ranges from low to very low quality. The interventions assessed included polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), probiotics, total glucosides of paeony (TGP), anti-inflammatory diets (AIDs), and others. TGP was the only intervention to significantly reduce both the disease activity score and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, although the quality of evidence for these effects was low. Probiotics contributed to significant reductions in C-reactive protein and visual analogue scale scores, with both outcomes rated as low quality. PUFAs demonstrated significant improvements in tender joint count, swollen joint count, and morning stiffness, though, like the other interventions, these effects were also rated as low quality.
Conclusion: There was relatively strong evidence supporting that PUFAs, probiotics, TGP, and AIDs may show some benefits on RA. However, the low quality of evidence highlights the need for further high-quality research and real-world evidence to confirm their effectiveness.
期刊介绍:
Autoimmunity Reviews is a publication that features up-to-date, structured reviews on various topics in the field of autoimmunity. These reviews are written by renowned experts and include demonstrative illustrations and tables. Each article will have a clear "take-home" message for readers.
The selection of articles is primarily done by the Editors-in-Chief, based on recommendations from the international Editorial Board. The topics covered in the articles span all areas of autoimmunology, aiming to bridge the gap between basic and clinical sciences.
In terms of content, the contributions in basic sciences delve into the pathophysiology and mechanisms of autoimmune disorders, as well as genomics and proteomics. On the other hand, clinical contributions focus on diseases related to autoimmunity, novel therapies, and clinical associations.
Autoimmunity Reviews is internationally recognized, and its articles are indexed and abstracted in prestigious databases such as PubMed/Medline, Science Citation Index Expanded, Biosciences Information Services, and Chemical Abstracts.