The Impact of Radiation Dose to Immune Cells in Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Era of Immunotherapy.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Clinical lung cancer Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.cllc.2025.02.006
Junyi He, Yingxin Liu, Xiaoqing Wang, Ruiting Song, Jingze Zhang, Butuo Li, Haohua Wang, Jinming Yu, Linlin Wang
{"title":"The Impact of Radiation Dose to Immune Cells in Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Era of Immunotherapy.","authors":"Junyi He, Yingxin Liu, Xiaoqing Wang, Ruiting Song, Jingze Zhang, Butuo Li, Haohua Wang, Jinming Yu, Linlin Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.02.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Thoracic radiotherapy (RT) is now widely used in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as palliative, consolidative or radical therapy. However, RT adversely impacts the immune system, which can be evaluated by calculating the estimated dose of radiation to immune cells (EDRIC). We evaluated the prognostic impact of the EDRIC in patients with advanced NSCLC who received immunotherapy and thoracic RT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively enrolled 152 stage IV NSCLC patients who had received first-line immunotherapy and thoracic RT. EDRIC was a model developed by Jin et al., calculated using the number of radiotherapy fractions, mean lung dose, mean heart dose, and mean body dose. Spearman's rank correlation was used to assess the correlations between variables. The relationships of EDRIC (≥5.7 Gy vs. <5.7 Gy) with survival were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median PFS and OS were shorter in the EDRIC ≥ 5.7 Gy group (PFS: 10.2 months vs. 18.6 months, P < .0001; OS: 19.8 months vs. 30.2 months, P = .024). In the multivariate model, higher EDRIC was associated with worse PFS (HR = 2.791, P < .0001) and OS (HR = 1.823, P = .028). Additionally, bone metastasis was associated with worse OS (HR = 1.751, P = .022).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EDRIC was an independent predictor for PFS and OS in advanced NSCLC patients receiving immunotherapy and RT. These observations necessitate further exploration into techniques to optimize radiation exposure to the immune system in cancer treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical lung cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2025.02.006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Thoracic radiotherapy (RT) is now widely used in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as palliative, consolidative or radical therapy. However, RT adversely impacts the immune system, which can be evaluated by calculating the estimated dose of radiation to immune cells (EDRIC). We evaluated the prognostic impact of the EDRIC in patients with advanced NSCLC who received immunotherapy and thoracic RT.

Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 152 stage IV NSCLC patients who had received first-line immunotherapy and thoracic RT. EDRIC was a model developed by Jin et al., calculated using the number of radiotherapy fractions, mean lung dose, mean heart dose, and mean body dose. Spearman's rank correlation was used to assess the correlations between variables. The relationships of EDRIC (≥5.7 Gy vs. <5.7 Gy) with survival were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models.

Results: The median PFS and OS were shorter in the EDRIC ≥ 5.7 Gy group (PFS: 10.2 months vs. 18.6 months, P < .0001; OS: 19.8 months vs. 30.2 months, P = .024). In the multivariate model, higher EDRIC was associated with worse PFS (HR = 2.791, P < .0001) and OS (HR = 1.823, P = .028). Additionally, bone metastasis was associated with worse OS (HR = 1.751, P = .022).

Conclusion: EDRIC was an independent predictor for PFS and OS in advanced NSCLC patients receiving immunotherapy and RT. These observations necessitate further exploration into techniques to optimize radiation exposure to the immune system in cancer treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical lung cancer
Clinical lung cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.80%
发文量
159
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Lung Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lung cancer. Clinical Lung Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lung cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lung cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
期刊最新文献
Brief Report: Real-World Clinical Utility of Next-Generation Sequencing of Circulating Tumor DNA for Patients With Advanced Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SQUIN). Racial Diversity and Co-Mutational Analysis of Biologically Relevant Alterations in EGFR Mutant Lung Cancers. The Impact of Radiation Dose to Immune Cells in Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Era of Immunotherapy. The PESGA Trial: A Prospective, Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase II Study to Evaluate First Line Therapy for Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) Patients, Treated by Induction Carboplatin/Etoposide/Pembrolizumab Followed by Maintenance of Pembrolizumab/ Sacituzumab Govitecan. Genomic Profiling of Driver Gene Alterations in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Patterns of Treatment and Impact on Survival Outcomes: A Single Center Experience of More Than 1200 Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1