{"title":"The Impact of Radiation Dose to Immune Cells in Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Era of Immunotherapy.","authors":"Junyi He, Yingxin Liu, Xiaoqing Wang, Ruiting Song, Jingze Zhang, Butuo Li, Haohua Wang, Jinming Yu, Linlin Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.02.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Thoracic radiotherapy (RT) is now widely used in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as palliative, consolidative or radical therapy. However, RT adversely impacts the immune system, which can be evaluated by calculating the estimated dose of radiation to immune cells (EDRIC). We evaluated the prognostic impact of the EDRIC in patients with advanced NSCLC who received immunotherapy and thoracic RT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively enrolled 152 stage IV NSCLC patients who had received first-line immunotherapy and thoracic RT. EDRIC was a model developed by Jin et al., calculated using the number of radiotherapy fractions, mean lung dose, mean heart dose, and mean body dose. Spearman's rank correlation was used to assess the correlations between variables. The relationships of EDRIC (≥5.7 Gy vs. <5.7 Gy) with survival were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median PFS and OS were shorter in the EDRIC ≥ 5.7 Gy group (PFS: 10.2 months vs. 18.6 months, P < .0001; OS: 19.8 months vs. 30.2 months, P = .024). In the multivariate model, higher EDRIC was associated with worse PFS (HR = 2.791, P < .0001) and OS (HR = 1.823, P = .028). Additionally, bone metastasis was associated with worse OS (HR = 1.751, P = .022).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EDRIC was an independent predictor for PFS and OS in advanced NSCLC patients receiving immunotherapy and RT. These observations necessitate further exploration into techniques to optimize radiation exposure to the immune system in cancer treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical lung cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2025.02.006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Thoracic radiotherapy (RT) is now widely used in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as palliative, consolidative or radical therapy. However, RT adversely impacts the immune system, which can be evaluated by calculating the estimated dose of radiation to immune cells (EDRIC). We evaluated the prognostic impact of the EDRIC in patients with advanced NSCLC who received immunotherapy and thoracic RT.
Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 152 stage IV NSCLC patients who had received first-line immunotherapy and thoracic RT. EDRIC was a model developed by Jin et al., calculated using the number of radiotherapy fractions, mean lung dose, mean heart dose, and mean body dose. Spearman's rank correlation was used to assess the correlations between variables. The relationships of EDRIC (≥5.7 Gy vs. <5.7 Gy) with survival were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models.
Results: The median PFS and OS were shorter in the EDRIC ≥ 5.7 Gy group (PFS: 10.2 months vs. 18.6 months, P < .0001; OS: 19.8 months vs. 30.2 months, P = .024). In the multivariate model, higher EDRIC was associated with worse PFS (HR = 2.791, P < .0001) and OS (HR = 1.823, P = .028). Additionally, bone metastasis was associated with worse OS (HR = 1.751, P = .022).
Conclusion: EDRIC was an independent predictor for PFS and OS in advanced NSCLC patients receiving immunotherapy and RT. These observations necessitate further exploration into techniques to optimize radiation exposure to the immune system in cancer treatment.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Lung Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lung cancer. Clinical Lung Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lung cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lung cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.