Francesca Sanguedolce, Angelo Cormio, Magda Zanelli, Andrea Palicelli, Maurizio Zizzo, Ugo Giovanni Falagario, Roberta Mazzucchelli, Andrea Benedetto Galosi, Giuseppe Carrieri, Luigi Cormio
{"title":"Diagnostic workout of glandular malignant lesions of the bladder according to the 5th WHO classification.","authors":"Francesca Sanguedolce, Angelo Cormio, Magda Zanelli, Andrea Palicelli, Maurizio Zizzo, Ugo Giovanni Falagario, Roberta Mazzucchelli, Andrea Benedetto Galosi, Giuseppe Carrieri, Luigi Cormio","doi":"10.1080/10408363.2025.2464248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Glandular lesions involving the bladder are less common than conventional urothelial carcinoma, and they are often diagnostically challenging diseases, carrying different clinical outcomes. As a group, they encompass both primary and secondary neoplasms, with sometimes overlapping morphological features. In this scenario, proper clinical information is important, in that secondary involvement of the bladder may occur by direct extension or lymphatic/hematogenous spread from carcinomas at other sites, comprising prostate, colon, cervix, breast, and lung. According to the 5th edition of the WHO Classification of urological tumors, glandular morphology is a major hallmark of the following entities: urothelial carcinoma with glandular differentiation, adenocarcinoma, NOS, urachal carcinoma, and tumors of Mullerian type. The distinction among these entities, and between primary and secondary tumors, heavily relies on their biological and immunophenotypical features. This article will review glandular neoplasms of the bladder, highlighting their main immunophenotypical markers. Furthermore, molecular data associated with their pathogenesis, prognosis, and treatment will be described. The aim of this study is to provide a practical and comprehensive up-to-date overview of this complex topic.</p>","PeriodicalId":10760,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2025.2464248","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Glandular lesions involving the bladder are less common than conventional urothelial carcinoma, and they are often diagnostically challenging diseases, carrying different clinical outcomes. As a group, they encompass both primary and secondary neoplasms, with sometimes overlapping morphological features. In this scenario, proper clinical information is important, in that secondary involvement of the bladder may occur by direct extension or lymphatic/hematogenous spread from carcinomas at other sites, comprising prostate, colon, cervix, breast, and lung. According to the 5th edition of the WHO Classification of urological tumors, glandular morphology is a major hallmark of the following entities: urothelial carcinoma with glandular differentiation, adenocarcinoma, NOS, urachal carcinoma, and tumors of Mullerian type. The distinction among these entities, and between primary and secondary tumors, heavily relies on their biological and immunophenotypical features. This article will review glandular neoplasms of the bladder, highlighting their main immunophenotypical markers. Furthermore, molecular data associated with their pathogenesis, prognosis, and treatment will be described. The aim of this study is to provide a practical and comprehensive up-to-date overview of this complex topic.
期刊介绍:
Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences publishes comprehensive and high quality review articles in all areas of clinical laboratory science, including clinical biochemistry, hematology, microbiology, pathology, transfusion medicine, genetics, immunology and molecular diagnostics. The reviews critically evaluate the status of current issues in the selected areas, with a focus on clinical laboratory diagnostics and latest advances. The adjective “critical” implies a balanced synthesis of results and conclusions that are frequently contradictory and controversial.