Emily Ashworth, Emma Allan, Cato Pauling, Harsimran Laidlow-Singh, Owen J Arthurs, Susan C Shelmerdine
{"title":"Artificial intelligence (AI) in radiological paediatric fracture assessment: an updated systematic review.","authors":"Emily Ashworth, Emma Allan, Cato Pauling, Harsimran Laidlow-Singh, Owen J Arthurs, Susan C Shelmerdine","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-11449-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recognising bone injuries in children is a critical part of children's imaging, and, recently, several AI algorithms have been developed for this purpose, both in research and commercial settings. We present an updated systematic review of the literature, including the latest developments.</p><p><strong>Methods/materials: </strong>Scopus, Web of Science, Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were queried for studies published between 1 January 2011 and 6 September 2024 matching search terms 'child', 'AI', 'fracture,' and 'imaging'. Retrieved studies were evaluated, and descriptive statistics were collated for diagnostic performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six eligible articles were included; seventeen (17/26, 65.%) of these were published within the last two years. Six studies (6/26, 23.1%) used open-source datasets to train their algorithm, the remainder used local data. Sixteen studies (16/26, 61.5%) evaluated a single joint (wrist, elbow, or ankle); multiple bones within the appendicular skeleton were assessed in the other ten studies. Seven articles (7/26, 26.9%) related to the performance of a commercial AI tool. Accuracy of AI models ranged from 85.0 to 100.0%. Six studies (6/26, 23.1%) evaluated the accuracy of human readers with and without AI assistance, of which two studies found a statistically significant improvement when humans were assisted by AI. The largest pool of human readers in any paper consisted of 11 readers of varying experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pace of research in AI fracture detection in children's imaging has increased. Studies show high accuracy of AI models, but proof of clinical impact, cost-effectiveness, and any socioeconomic or ethical bias are still lacking.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question AI model development has rapidly increased in recent years. We present the latest developments in AI model diagnostic accuracy for paediatric fracture detection. Findings Studies now demonstrate performance improvement when AI is used to assist human interpretation of paediatric fractures, especially when aiding junior radiologists. Clinical relevance Studies show high accuracy for AI models; however, further research is needed to evaluate AI across diverse age groups, bone diseases, and fracture types. Evidence of real-world patient benefit for AI and any socioeconomic or ethical bias are still lacking.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"5264-5286"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11449-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Recognising bone injuries in children is a critical part of children's imaging, and, recently, several AI algorithms have been developed for this purpose, both in research and commercial settings. We present an updated systematic review of the literature, including the latest developments.
Methods/materials: Scopus, Web of Science, Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were queried for studies published between 1 January 2011 and 6 September 2024 matching search terms 'child', 'AI', 'fracture,' and 'imaging'. Retrieved studies were evaluated, and descriptive statistics were collated for diagnostic performance.
Results: Twenty-six eligible articles were included; seventeen (17/26, 65.%) of these were published within the last two years. Six studies (6/26, 23.1%) used open-source datasets to train their algorithm, the remainder used local data. Sixteen studies (16/26, 61.5%) evaluated a single joint (wrist, elbow, or ankle); multiple bones within the appendicular skeleton were assessed in the other ten studies. Seven articles (7/26, 26.9%) related to the performance of a commercial AI tool. Accuracy of AI models ranged from 85.0 to 100.0%. Six studies (6/26, 23.1%) evaluated the accuracy of human readers with and without AI assistance, of which two studies found a statistically significant improvement when humans were assisted by AI. The largest pool of human readers in any paper consisted of 11 readers of varying experience.
Conclusion: The pace of research in AI fracture detection in children's imaging has increased. Studies show high accuracy of AI models, but proof of clinical impact, cost-effectiveness, and any socioeconomic or ethical bias are still lacking.
Key points: Question AI model development has rapidly increased in recent years. We present the latest developments in AI model diagnostic accuracy for paediatric fracture detection. Findings Studies now demonstrate performance improvement when AI is used to assist human interpretation of paediatric fractures, especially when aiding junior radiologists. Clinical relevance Studies show high accuracy for AI models; however, further research is needed to evaluate AI across diverse age groups, bone diseases, and fracture types. Evidence of real-world patient benefit for AI and any socioeconomic or ethical bias are still lacking.
背景:识别儿童骨骼损伤是儿童成像的关键部分,最近,在研究和商业环境中,为此目的开发了几种人工智能算法。我们提出了一个更新的系统综述的文献,包括最新的发展。方法/材料:在Scopus、Web of Science、Pubmed、Embase和Cochrane Library数据库中查询2011年1月1日至2024年9月6日期间发表的与“儿童”、“人工智能”、“骨折”和“成像”匹配的研究。对检索到的研究进行评估,并对诊断性能进行描述性统计整理。结果:纳入26篇符合条件的文章;其中17篇(17/26,65%)是近两年发表的。6项研究(6/26,23.1%)使用开源数据集训练算法,其余研究使用本地数据。16项研究(16/26,61.5%)评估单个关节(腕、肘或踝关节);在其他10项研究中,对阑尾骨骼内的多个骨骼进行了评估。7篇文章(7/26,26.9%)与商业人工智能工具的性能有关。人工智能模型的准确率从85.0%到100.0%不等。6项研究(6/ 26,23.1%)评估了人工智能辅助和非人工智能辅助下人类读者的准确性,其中两项研究发现人工智能辅助下人类读者的准确性有统计学上的显著提高。在任何一篇论文中,最大的人类读者群体由11名不同经验的读者组成。结论:人工智能在儿童骨折影像学检测中的研究步伐加快。研究表明,人工智能模型的准确性很高,但仍然缺乏临床影响、成本效益和任何社会经济或伦理偏见的证据。人工智能模型近年来发展迅速。我们介绍了人工智能模型在儿科骨折检测诊断准确性方面的最新进展。研究结果表明,当人工智能被用于辅助儿科骨折的人工解释时,特别是在帮助初级放射科医生时,性能得到了改善。临床相关性研究表明,人工智能模型具有较高的准确性;然而,需要进一步的研究来评估不同年龄组、骨骼疾病和骨折类型的人工智能。人工智能对现实世界患者有益的证据以及任何社会经济或伦理偏见仍然缺乏。
期刊介绍:
European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field.
This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies.
From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.