Cost-effectiveness analysis of trilaciclib for reducing the incidence of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression among patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer in China.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1080/14737167.2025.2478241
Nan Fang, Xuan Xia, Xiaoning He
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness analysis of trilaciclib for reducing the incidence of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression among patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer in China.","authors":"Nan Fang, Xuan Xia, Xiaoning He","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2025.2478241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression (CIM) is the most common adverse event associated with chemotherapy. The recently approved novel pharmacotherapy trilaciclib demonstrates potential to provide multilineage protection against CIM. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of trilaciclib among patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) in China.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A short-term Markov model and long-term partitioned survival model were developed to simulate disease progression during and after chemotherapy over a lifetime horizon. Clinical, cost, and utility parameters were obtained from three pivotal clinical trials of trilaciclib, published literature, and expert opinion. Total cost, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated. Scenario analyses and sensitivity analyses assessed model robustness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The lifetime incremental cost per patient for trilaciclib was CN¥22,828 (US$3,210), with an incremental QALY of 0.093, yielding an ICER of CN¥245,841 (US$34,565) per QALY gained. This ICER falls below China's willingness-to-pay threshold of three times per-capita GDP (CN¥268,074, US$37,691). Extensive sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the base-case findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Trilaciclib represents a cost-effective option for reducing the incidence of CIM in ES-SCLC patients. These results support reimbursement decisions and pricing strategies for trilaciclib in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2025.2478241","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression (CIM) is the most common adverse event associated with chemotherapy. The recently approved novel pharmacotherapy trilaciclib demonstrates potential to provide multilineage protection against CIM. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of trilaciclib among patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) in China.

Research design and methods: A short-term Markov model and long-term partitioned survival model were developed to simulate disease progression during and after chemotherapy over a lifetime horizon. Clinical, cost, and utility parameters were obtained from three pivotal clinical trials of trilaciclib, published literature, and expert opinion. Total cost, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated. Scenario analyses and sensitivity analyses assessed model robustness.

Results: The lifetime incremental cost per patient for trilaciclib was CN¥22,828 (US$3,210), with an incremental QALY of 0.093, yielding an ICER of CN¥245,841 (US$34,565) per QALY gained. This ICER falls below China's willingness-to-pay threshold of three times per-capita GDP (CN¥268,074, US$37,691). Extensive sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the base-case findings.

Conclusions: Trilaciclib represents a cost-effective option for reducing the incidence of CIM in ES-SCLC patients. These results support reimbursement decisions and pricing strategies for trilaciclib in China.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
期刊最新文献
Cost-effectiveness analysis of trilaciclib for reducing the incidence of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression among patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer in China. Preferences of nurses in the United Kingdom for attributes of pediatric hexavalent vaccines: a discrete-choice experiment. Patient-relevance of outcome measures in breast cancer clinical trials: a cross-sectional comparative analysis of patient preferences and trials conducted between 2014 and 2024. Evaluation of biological drug consumption in Italy during 2022: a comparative analysis between two healthcare facilities. Cost comparison of F(ab')2 and Fab antivenoms for pit viper envenomation in the United States: a real-world analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1