Hydrocephalus Renders Ventricular or Subarachnoid Drainage as an Efficacies Cure for Decompressive Craniectomy-Induced Subdural Effusion After Traumatic Brain Injury.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Journal of Craniofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000010819
Huaping Huang, Yang Chen, Wanglu Hu, Shidi Yang, Haijian Wu, Liansheng Gao, Wei Yan
{"title":"Hydrocephalus Renders Ventricular or Subarachnoid Drainage as an Efficacies Cure for Decompressive Craniectomy-Induced Subdural Effusion After Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Huaping Huang, Yang Chen, Wanglu Hu, Shidi Yang, Haijian Wu, Liansheng Gao, Wei Yan","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000010819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients with decompressive craniectomy (DC) frequently accompany the complication of secondary subdural effusion (SDE). In cases where cranioplasty is contraindicated, there are no clear-cut guidelines on surgical approaches for managing subdural effusion resulting from DC. Therefore, the authors conducted this study to compare different surgical procedures for patients with SDE in the context of contraindications for cranioplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical data of 59 patients with SDE following DC for TBI, who had contraindication of cranioplasty and received surgical treatment for SDE, were retrospectively selected from January 2010 to June 2023. The therapeutic efficacy of SDE was assessed based on the dynamic head CT scans performed within 1 month after surgery and the improvement of clinical symptoms. The authors compared the effects of ventricular or subarachnoid drainage (VSD, n = 33) and subdural drainage (SDD, n = 29), which, respectively, serve as CSF of control and direct diversion. Subgroup analysis also considered the presence or absence of hydrocephalus and the associated risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study found that VSD group exhibited superior therapeutic effects compared with SDD group. (75.8% versus 38.4%; P =0.004), with no significant difference in complication ( P =0.543). Subgroup analysis indicates that patients with hydrocephalus who directly received VSD had better treatment effect than SDD (93.3% versus 11.1%, P <0.001), while for patients without hydrocephalus, there was no significant difference between the VSD group and the SDD group (61.1% versus 52.9%, P =0.442). Furthermore, in patients without hydrocephalus but at risk of hydrocephalus, the therapeutic effects of VSD were superior to those of SDD(100% versus 14%, P <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study reveal that VSD could be considered first compare to SDD for SDE patients with contraindications to cranioplastyt, especially when patients have a hydrocephalus or risk factors for hydrocephalus.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1649-1654"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000010819","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients with decompressive craniectomy (DC) frequently accompany the complication of secondary subdural effusion (SDE). In cases where cranioplasty is contraindicated, there are no clear-cut guidelines on surgical approaches for managing subdural effusion resulting from DC. Therefore, the authors conducted this study to compare different surgical procedures for patients with SDE in the context of contraindications for cranioplasty.

Methods: The clinical data of 59 patients with SDE following DC for TBI, who had contraindication of cranioplasty and received surgical treatment for SDE, were retrospectively selected from January 2010 to June 2023. The therapeutic efficacy of SDE was assessed based on the dynamic head CT scans performed within 1 month after surgery and the improvement of clinical symptoms. The authors compared the effects of ventricular or subarachnoid drainage (VSD, n = 33) and subdural drainage (SDD, n = 29), which, respectively, serve as CSF of control and direct diversion. Subgroup analysis also considered the presence or absence of hydrocephalus and the associated risk.

Results: This study found that VSD group exhibited superior therapeutic effects compared with SDD group. (75.8% versus 38.4%; P =0.004), with no significant difference in complication ( P =0.543). Subgroup analysis indicates that patients with hydrocephalus who directly received VSD had better treatment effect than SDD (93.3% versus 11.1%, P <0.001), while for patients without hydrocephalus, there was no significant difference between the VSD group and the SDD group (61.1% versus 52.9%, P =0.442). Furthermore, in patients without hydrocephalus but at risk of hydrocephalus, the therapeutic effects of VSD were superior to those of SDD(100% versus 14%, P <0.001).

Conclusion: Our study reveal that VSD could be considered first compare to SDD for SDE patients with contraindications to cranioplastyt, especially when patients have a hydrocephalus or risk factors for hydrocephalus.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑积水导致脑室或蛛网膜下腔引流作为创伤性脑损伤后减压开颅所致硬膜下积液的有效治疗。
目的:外伤性脑损伤(TBI)行颅骨减压术(DC)患者常伴有继发性硬膜下积液(SDE)并发症。在颅成形术禁忌的情况下,对于处理DC引起的硬膜下积液的手术方法没有明确的指导方针。因此,作者进行了这项研究,以比较在颅成形术禁忌症背景下SDE患者的不同手术方法。方法:回顾性分析2010年1月至2023年6月59例TBI DC术后SDE患者的临床资料,这些患者均有颅骨成形术禁忌症并接受了SDE手术治疗。根据术后1个月内头部CT动态扫描及临床症状改善情况评估SDE治疗效果。作者比较了脑室或蛛网膜下腔引流(VSD, n = 33)和硬膜下引流(SDD, n = 29)分别作为对照脑脊液和直接分流脑脊液的效果。亚组分析还考虑了脑积水的存在与否以及相关的风险。结果:本研究发现VSD组治疗效果优于SDD组。(75.8%对38.4%;P=0.004),并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P=0.543)。亚组分析显示,直接接受VSD治疗的脑积水患者的治疗效果优于SDD (93.3% vs 11.1%)。结论:我们的研究表明,对于有颅骨成形术禁忌的SDE患者,尤其是有脑积水或有脑积水危险因素的患者,可以优先考虑VSD而不是SDD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
期刊最新文献
Cleft Lip Repair: Trends of Nasoalveolar Molding, Concomitant Tip Rhinoplasty and/or Septoplasty, and Revisions Using a National Database Study. A Novel 3D-Printed Surgical Guide for Multiplanar Chin Reduction in Facial Feminization Surgery. Parietal Intradiploic Epidermoid Cyst Invading the Dura Mater. Safe Maxillary Segmentation in Le Fort I Osteotomy. A Technical Note. Clinical Safety and Healing Outcomes of an Essential-Oil Gel Versus Hyaluronic Acid: A Randomized Controlled Trial After Tooth Extraction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1