Prediction of postpartum depression in women: development and validation of multiple machine learning models.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Journal of Translational Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1186/s12967-025-06289-6
Weijing Qi, Yongjian Wang, Yipeng Wang, Sha Huang, Cong Li, Haoyu Jin, Jinfan Zuo, Xuefei Cui, Ziqi Wei, Qing Guo, Jie Hu
{"title":"Prediction of postpartum depression in women: development and validation of multiple machine learning models.","authors":"Weijing Qi, Yongjian Wang, Yipeng Wang, Sha Huang, Cong Li, Haoyu Jin, Jinfan Zuo, Xuefei Cui, Ziqi Wei, Qing Guo, Jie Hu","doi":"10.1186/s12967-025-06289-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postpartum depression (PPD) is a significant public health issue. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML) models using biopsychosocial predictors to predict the risk of PPD for perinatal women and to provide several risk assessment tools for the early detection of PPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Candidate predictors, including history of mental illness and demographic, psychosocial, and physiological factors, were obtained from 1138 perinatal women between August 2021 and August 2022. The primary outcome of PPD was measured with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale at 6 weeks postpartum. Seven feature selection methods and six ML algorithms were employed to develop models, and their prediction performances were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 potential predictive factors associated with PPD were identified and subsequently used to construct prenatal and postpartum predictive models for PPD. The cross-validation results showed that the models built on logistic regression (LR) [area under the curve (AUC): 0.801, 0.858] and artificial neural network (ANN) (AUC: 0.787, 0.844) algorithms exhibited the best prediction performance. In contrast to the prenatal models, the addition of postpartum predictors (primary caregiver and mother-in-law's care) remarkably improved the predictive performance of the postpartum models. The risk-stratification score, the nomogram, and the Shapley additive explanation were used to visualize and interpret the risk prediction model for predicting PPD in the early stage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The LR and ANN models achieved the best predictive performances. Applying these models and risk assessment tools to early predict and screen PPD has several implications for public health.</p>","PeriodicalId":17458,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Translational Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"291"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Translational Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-025-06289-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Postpartum depression (PPD) is a significant public health issue. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML) models using biopsychosocial predictors to predict the risk of PPD for perinatal women and to provide several risk assessment tools for the early detection of PPD.

Methods: Candidate predictors, including history of mental illness and demographic, psychosocial, and physiological factors, were obtained from 1138 perinatal women between August 2021 and August 2022. The primary outcome of PPD was measured with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale at 6 weeks postpartum. Seven feature selection methods and six ML algorithms were employed to develop models, and their prediction performances were compared.

Results: A total of 11 potential predictive factors associated with PPD were identified and subsequently used to construct prenatal and postpartum predictive models for PPD. The cross-validation results showed that the models built on logistic regression (LR) [area under the curve (AUC): 0.801, 0.858] and artificial neural network (ANN) (AUC: 0.787, 0.844) algorithms exhibited the best prediction performance. In contrast to the prenatal models, the addition of postpartum predictors (primary caregiver and mother-in-law's care) remarkably improved the predictive performance of the postpartum models. The risk-stratification score, the nomogram, and the Shapley additive explanation were used to visualize and interpret the risk prediction model for predicting PPD in the early stage.

Conclusions: The LR and ANN models achieved the best predictive performances. Applying these models and risk assessment tools to early predict and screen PPD has several implications for public health.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Translational Medicine
Journal of Translational Medicine 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
537
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Translational Medicine is an open-access journal that publishes articles focusing on information derived from human experimentation to enhance communication between basic and clinical science. It covers all areas of translational medicine.
期刊最新文献
mTORC1 syndrome (TorS): unifying paradigm for PASC, ME/CFS and PAIS. Immunosenescence and interactions for lymphocyte deep immunophenotyping. Prediction of postpartum depression in women: development and validation of multiple machine learning models. Link of TMPRSS2 expression with tumor immunogenicity and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancers. Mapping fatigue: discovering brain regions and genes linked to fatigue susceptibility.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1