Acid-base implications of the Gibbs-Donnan effect during continuous veno-venous hemofiltration.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Journal of Nephrology Pub Date : 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1007/s40620-025-02238-0
Francesco Zadek, Beatrice Brunoni, Francesca Mulazzani, Irene Sironi, Stefania Paccagnini, Maria Luisa De Angelis, Roberto Fumagalli, Thomas Langer
{"title":"Acid-base implications of the Gibbs-Donnan effect during continuous veno-venous hemofiltration.","authors":"Francesco Zadek, Beatrice Brunoni, Francesca Mulazzani, Irene Sironi, Stefania Paccagnini, Maria Luisa De Angelis, Roberto Fumagalli, Thomas Langer","doi":"10.1007/s40620-025-02238-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This in-vitro and in-vivo study investigates the Gibbs-Donnan effect across the filter during continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH). In particular, we assessed its acid-base implications, applying the physical-chemical approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, single-center study was conducted using the PrismaMax machine (Baxter). Two sets of in-vitro CVVH experiments (with and without albumin) were performed to quantify the Gibbs-Donnan effect. Electrolytes, glucose, and osmolarity changes were measured across the filter and in the ultrafiltrate. Strong ion difference and sieving coefficients of the main solutes were calculated. Similar measurements were performed in oligo-anuric critically ill patients undergoing CVVH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In-vitro experiments without albumin showed a sieving coefficient of 1 for both positive and negative ions. On the contrary, when albumin was added, the sieving coefficient for sodium and chloride changed linearly with albumin concentration (r = -0.94, p < 0.001 for sodium, r = 0.88, p < 0.001 for chloride), resulting in a progressive linear increase in post-filter strong ion difference (β = 1.1, r = 0.77, p = 0.003). In 22 studied patients, calculated albumin concentration increased across the filter (2.2 ± 0.5 g/dL vs. 3.1 ± 0.7 g/dL), leading to sodium retention (138 ± 6 vs. 141 ± 6 mmol/L, p < 0.001) and chloride excretion (100 ± 5 vs. 97 ± 5 mmol/L, p < 0.001), thus resulting in a higher post-filter strong ion difference (46 ± 4 vs. 40 ± 4 mmol/L, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These in-vitro and in-vivo studies demonstrate that albumin linearly affects the sieving coefficient of ions, increasing the strong ion difference of plasma water during its passage through the filter and thus having a systemic alkalizing effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":16542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-025-02238-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This in-vitro and in-vivo study investigates the Gibbs-Donnan effect across the filter during continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH). In particular, we assessed its acid-base implications, applying the physical-chemical approach.

Methods: A prospective, single-center study was conducted using the PrismaMax machine (Baxter). Two sets of in-vitro CVVH experiments (with and without albumin) were performed to quantify the Gibbs-Donnan effect. Electrolytes, glucose, and osmolarity changes were measured across the filter and in the ultrafiltrate. Strong ion difference and sieving coefficients of the main solutes were calculated. Similar measurements were performed in oligo-anuric critically ill patients undergoing CVVH.

Results: In-vitro experiments without albumin showed a sieving coefficient of 1 for both positive and negative ions. On the contrary, when albumin was added, the sieving coefficient for sodium and chloride changed linearly with albumin concentration (r = -0.94, p < 0.001 for sodium, r = 0.88, p < 0.001 for chloride), resulting in a progressive linear increase in post-filter strong ion difference (β = 1.1, r = 0.77, p = 0.003). In 22 studied patients, calculated albumin concentration increased across the filter (2.2 ± 0.5 g/dL vs. 3.1 ± 0.7 g/dL), leading to sodium retention (138 ± 6 vs. 141 ± 6 mmol/L, p < 0.001) and chloride excretion (100 ± 5 vs. 97 ± 5 mmol/L, p < 0.001), thus resulting in a higher post-filter strong ion difference (46 ± 4 vs. 40 ± 4 mmol/L, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: These in-vitro and in-vivo studies demonstrate that albumin linearly affects the sieving coefficient of ions, increasing the strong ion difference of plasma water during its passage through the filter and thus having a systemic alkalizing effect.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nephrology
Journal of Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Nephrology is a bimonthly journal that considers publication of peer reviewed original manuscripts dealing with both clinical and laboratory investigations of relevance to the broad fields of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation. It is the Official Journal of the Italian Society of Nephrology (SIN).
期刊最新文献
Development and validation of a prediction model for 90-day mortality among critically ill patients with AKI undergoing CRRT. Acid-base implications of the Gibbs-Donnan effect during continuous veno-venous hemofiltration. Chronic kidney disease awareness: a cross-sectional study in primary care settings in Türkiye. Lead intoxication in end-stage kidney disease: a lesson for the clinical nephrologist. Systemic capillary leak syndrome: a nosological entity that the nephrologist must be aware of.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1