{"title":"Points to consider for revising the ICH S7A guideline on safety and secondary pharmacology.","authors":"Jean-Pierre Valentin, Derek Leishman","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although the ICH S7A guideline on safety pharmacology largely achieved its objective, a proportion of remaining adverse drug reactions and attrition can be attributed in part to gaps in safety and secondary pharmacology assessments. Advances in science, technology, drug development paradigm and regulatory practices necessitate revisiting and evolving ICH S7A to address these limitations. The anticipated completion of the ICH S7B Q&As by end of 2025 provides an opportunity to integrate its outcomes with ICH S7A into a comprehensive, modality-agnostic sustainable over time framework. Such consolidation could streamline guidance, enhance usability, and align regulatory expectations globally. This proposed revision should aim to address key aspects of safety and secondary pharmacology, including the definition of adversity, the integration of human-relevant in vitro and in silico models, and the adoption of state-of-the-art in vivo platforms. Further considerations should include the development of principles for model and assay validation, the promotion of integrated risk assessment frameworks, and incorporation of weight of evidence approaches. Revised guideline would also emphasize sustainable practices by adapting to evolving therapeutic modalities, while reducing reliance on animal testing through New Approach Methodologies. The revision seeks to enhance the benefit-risk evaluation of drug candidates, refine clinical monitoring, foster regulatory acceptance, and streamline drug development. This comprehensive update has the potential to not only optimize drug safety evaluations but also to align industry practices with modern scientific advancements and ethical considerations, ensuring a more robust and efficient pathway for therapeutic innovation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"105795"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105795","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although the ICH S7A guideline on safety pharmacology largely achieved its objective, a proportion of remaining adverse drug reactions and attrition can be attributed in part to gaps in safety and secondary pharmacology assessments. Advances in science, technology, drug development paradigm and regulatory practices necessitate revisiting and evolving ICH S7A to address these limitations. The anticipated completion of the ICH S7B Q&As by end of 2025 provides an opportunity to integrate its outcomes with ICH S7A into a comprehensive, modality-agnostic sustainable over time framework. Such consolidation could streamline guidance, enhance usability, and align regulatory expectations globally. This proposed revision should aim to address key aspects of safety and secondary pharmacology, including the definition of adversity, the integration of human-relevant in vitro and in silico models, and the adoption of state-of-the-art in vivo platforms. Further considerations should include the development of principles for model and assay validation, the promotion of integrated risk assessment frameworks, and incorporation of weight of evidence approaches. Revised guideline would also emphasize sustainable practices by adapting to evolving therapeutic modalities, while reducing reliance on animal testing through New Approach Methodologies. The revision seeks to enhance the benefit-risk evaluation of drug candidates, refine clinical monitoring, foster regulatory acceptance, and streamline drug development. This comprehensive update has the potential to not only optimize drug safety evaluations but also to align industry practices with modern scientific advancements and ethical considerations, ensuring a more robust and efficient pathway for therapeutic innovation.
期刊介绍:
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health.
Types of peer-reviewed articles published:
-Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to:
1.Factors influencing human sensitivity
2.Exposure science related to risk assessment
3.Alternative toxicological test methods
4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations
5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies
6.Read-across methods and evaluations
-Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues
-Letters to the Editor
-Guest Editorials (by Invitation)