The HUNT study: long-term within-subject variation of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH).

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation Pub Date : 2025-03-08 DOI:10.1080/00365513.2025.2475473
Arne Åsberg, Marius Berg, Gunhild Garmo Hov, Ingrid Alsos Lian, Lena Løfblad, Gustav Mikkelsen
{"title":"The HUNT study: long-term within-subject variation of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH).","authors":"Arne Åsberg, Marius Berg, Gunhild Garmo Hov, Ingrid Alsos Lian, Lena Løfblad, Gustav Mikkelsen","doi":"10.1080/00365513.2025.2475473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Data on the long-term within-subject biological variation (CV<sub>I</sub>) of serum thyroid stimulating hormone (S-TSH) are scarce. In the EFLM Biological Variation Database, the longest observation period was one year. We estimated a coefficient of variation that included analytical variation (CV<sub>I+A</sub>) using data from 16,976 individuals in the Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT), where S-TSH was measured on two occasions with an average interval of 10.6 (range 9.3-12.3) years. These individuals reported their health to be 'good' or 'very good' on both occasions and were not registered with any diagnoses or use of medications (according to Norwegian Prescribed Drug Registry) related to the thyroid. We used the software refineR to identify an assumed nonpathological subpopulation in the distribution of distances from each observation to the center of the bivariate distribution of the two S-TSH-values. From this subpopulation, individuals with a distance ≤ the 95 percentile in the distribution of distances were selected for estimation of CV<sub>I+A</sub>. The difference in percent of the mean (DPM) was calculated for each individual, and CV<sub>I+A</sub> as the standard deviation in the distribution of DPMs divided by 2<sup>0.5</sup>. This method was robust against systematic bias between the two measurements. CV<sub>I+A</sub> was 21<b>-</b>23% for different groups of age and sex. Accounting for CV<sub>A</sub> would imply a CV<sub>I</sub> 0.1-0.8% less than CV<sub>I+A</sub>. Our estimates are well within the 12-29.3% range of CV<sub>I</sub> reported from the seven studies in the meta-analysis of the EFLM Biological Variation Database.</p>","PeriodicalId":21474,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2025.2475473","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Data on the long-term within-subject biological variation (CVI) of serum thyroid stimulating hormone (S-TSH) are scarce. In the EFLM Biological Variation Database, the longest observation period was one year. We estimated a coefficient of variation that included analytical variation (CVI+A) using data from 16,976 individuals in the Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT), where S-TSH was measured on two occasions with an average interval of 10.6 (range 9.3-12.3) years. These individuals reported their health to be 'good' or 'very good' on both occasions and were not registered with any diagnoses or use of medications (according to Norwegian Prescribed Drug Registry) related to the thyroid. We used the software refineR to identify an assumed nonpathological subpopulation in the distribution of distances from each observation to the center of the bivariate distribution of the two S-TSH-values. From this subpopulation, individuals with a distance ≤ the 95 percentile in the distribution of distances were selected for estimation of CVI+A. The difference in percent of the mean (DPM) was calculated for each individual, and CVI+A as the standard deviation in the distribution of DPMs divided by 20.5. This method was robust against systematic bias between the two measurements. CVI+A was 21-23% for different groups of age and sex. Accounting for CVA would imply a CVI 0.1-0.8% less than CVI+A. Our estimates are well within the 12-29.3% range of CVI reported from the seven studies in the meta-analysis of the EFLM Biological Variation Database.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
85
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation is an international scientific journal covering clinically oriented biochemical and physiological research. Since the launch of the journal in 1949, it has been a forum for international laboratory medicine, closely related to, and edited by, The Scandinavian Society for Clinical Chemistry. The journal contains peer-reviewed articles, editorials, invited reviews, and short technical notes, as well as several supplements each year. Supplements consist of monographs, and symposium and congress reports covering subjects within clinical chemistry and clinical physiology.
期刊最新文献
Monitoring CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes count after prolonged blood storage. The HUNT study: long-term within-subject variation of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH). Short-term stability of routine coagulation tests under different storage temperatures in centrifuged whole blood samples: a practical approach. CgA100 - eGFR-adjusted serum chromogranin A. Assessment of large language models in medical quizzes for clinical chemistry and laboratory management: implications and applications for healthcare artificial intelligence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1