Assessing the beliefs and impacts of strength training in a Division I collegiate gymnastics team.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION PM&R Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1002/pmrj.13350
Tammy Ng, Tyler Bendrick, Mary Swanstrom, Ellen Casey, Machelle Wilson, Kevin Burnham, Marcia Faustin
{"title":"Assessing the beliefs and impacts of strength training in a Division I collegiate gymnastics team.","authors":"Tammy Ng, Tyler Bendrick, Mary Swanstrom, Ellen Casey, Machelle Wilson, Kevin Burnham, Marcia Faustin","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.13350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditionally, there has been a reluctance to use weight training with female gymnasts due to concerns that it could cause detrimental increases in muscle mass and impede flexibility. Recent literature has demonstrated that strength training has no significant effect on flexibility and can improve athletic performance.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess in a pilot study the perceptions of collegiate gymnasts and coaches toward strength training after starting inaugural strength and conditioning training.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Survey-based study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>National Collegiate Athletics Association Division I women's gymnastics program at a public university in California.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Of the 23 gymnasts surveyed, 17 (74%) responded to the survey. Of the two coaches surveyed, both (100%) responded to the survey.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Descriptive statistics characterizing demographics, characteristics of gymnasts' strength and conditioning program, and perceptions regarding the safety of strength training and its impact on performance, body shape, flexibility, and injury rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most gymnasts agreed (35%) or strongly agreed (59%) that weight training may improve performance. All gymnasts disagreed (59%) or strongly disagreed (41%) that weight training is not safe; 41% disagreed, 29% strongly disagreed, and 17% agreed that weight training may negatively affect body shape. Most gymnasts disagreed (59%) or strongly disagreed (18%) that weight training decreases flexibility; four (24%) felt neutral. Eighty three percent (59% strongly agree, 24% agree) felt that weight training had a positive impact on performance. More than half of the gymnasts either agreed (24%) or strongly agreed (29%) they had fewer injuries the season after implementing weight training, compared to prior seasons. Both coaches similarly endorsed the safety of strength training and its potential to improve performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this pilot study, collegiate gymnasts and coaches expressed generally positive perceptions toward the safety of strength training and its effect on performance. A small number of gymnasts expressed concerns regarding the effects of weight training on body shape and flexibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":20354,"journal":{"name":"PM&R","volume":" ","pages":"771-781"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12238741/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PM&R","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13350","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Traditionally, there has been a reluctance to use weight training with female gymnasts due to concerns that it could cause detrimental increases in muscle mass and impede flexibility. Recent literature has demonstrated that strength training has no significant effect on flexibility and can improve athletic performance.

Objective: To assess in a pilot study the perceptions of collegiate gymnasts and coaches toward strength training after starting inaugural strength and conditioning training.

Design: Survey-based study.

Setting: National Collegiate Athletics Association Division I women's gymnastics program at a public university in California.

Participants: Of the 23 gymnasts surveyed, 17 (74%) responded to the survey. Of the two coaches surveyed, both (100%) responded to the survey.

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main outcome measures: Descriptive statistics characterizing demographics, characteristics of gymnasts' strength and conditioning program, and perceptions regarding the safety of strength training and its impact on performance, body shape, flexibility, and injury rates.

Results: Most gymnasts agreed (35%) or strongly agreed (59%) that weight training may improve performance. All gymnasts disagreed (59%) or strongly disagreed (41%) that weight training is not safe; 41% disagreed, 29% strongly disagreed, and 17% agreed that weight training may negatively affect body shape. Most gymnasts disagreed (59%) or strongly disagreed (18%) that weight training decreases flexibility; four (24%) felt neutral. Eighty three percent (59% strongly agree, 24% agree) felt that weight training had a positive impact on performance. More than half of the gymnasts either agreed (24%) or strongly agreed (29%) they had fewer injuries the season after implementing weight training, compared to prior seasons. Both coaches similarly endorsed the safety of strength training and its potential to improve performance.

Conclusions: In this pilot study, collegiate gymnasts and coaches expressed generally positive perceptions toward the safety of strength training and its effect on performance. A small number of gymnasts expressed concerns regarding the effects of weight training on body shape and flexibility.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学体操队力量训练信念及效果之评估。
背景:传统上,女性体操运动员不愿意使用重量训练,因为担心它会导致肌肉质量的有害增加和阻碍灵活性。最近的文献表明,力量训练对柔韧性没有显著影响,可以提高运动成绩。目的:通过一项初步研究,评估大学生体操运动员和教练员在开始首次力量训练后对力量训练的认知。设计:基于调查的研究。背景:加州一所公立大学的全国大学田径协会一级女子体操项目。参与者:在23名体操运动员中,有17名(74%)回应了调查。在接受调查的两位教练中,两位(100%)都对调查做出了回应。干预措施:不适用。主要结果测量:描述人口统计学特征的描述性统计,体操运动员力量和调节计划的特征,以及关于力量训练的安全性及其对表现,体型,柔韧性和受伤率的影响的看法。结果:大多数体操运动员同意(35%)或强烈同意(59%)重量训练可以提高成绩。所有体操运动员都不同意(59%)或强烈不同意(41%)举重训练不安全;41%的人不同意,29%的人非常不同意,17%的人认为举重训练可能会对体型产生负面影响。大多数体操运动员不同意(59%)或强烈不同意(18%)重量训练会降低柔韧性;四人(24%)感觉中立。83%的人(59%强烈同意,24%同意)认为重量训练对成绩有积极影响。超过一半的体操运动员要么同意(24%),要么非常同意(29%),他们在实施重量训练后的赛季受伤比前几个赛季少。两位教练同样认可力量训练的安全性及其提高成绩的潜力。结论:在本初步研究中,大学生体操运动员和教练对力量训练的安全性及其对成绩的影响普遍持积极态度。少数体操运动员对重量训练对体型和柔韧性的影响表示担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PM&R
PM&R REHABILITATION-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics covered include acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain, neurologic conditions involving the central and peripheral nervous systems, rehabilitation of impairments associated with disabilities in adults and children, and neurophysiology and electrodiagnosis. PM&R emphasizes principles of injury, function, and rehabilitation, and is designed to be relevant to practitioners and researchers in a variety of medical and surgical specialties and rehabilitation disciplines including allied health.
期刊最新文献
Comparing perceptions of chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) across health care disciplines. Associations between activity limitations and participation restrictions in people with late effects of polio. Differences in female athlete triad risk factors between Japanese and American female runners: A comparative study. A medical education leadership track for PM&R residents: A promising way to develop clinician educators. Quantitative assessments of ultrasound-based rotator cuff muscle quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1