Evaluating the Accuracy of Surrogate Markers for Identifying Opioid-Associated Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests.

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Resuscitation Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110569
Jamie Jasti, Kristopher Kennedy, Riccardo M Colella, Tom P Aufderheide
{"title":"Evaluating the Accuracy of Surrogate Markers for Identifying Opioid-Associated Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests.","authors":"Jamie Jasti, Kristopher Kennedy, Riccardo M Colella, Tom P Aufderheide","doi":"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have used emergency medical services (EMS) naloxone administration and EMS overdose impression as surrogate markers to identify opioid-associated (OA) out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OA-OHCA). We evaluated the accuracy of these two surrogate markers using medical examiner post-mortem toxicology data in OHCA patients who died.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all adult (≥ 18) non-traumatic OHCA patients treated by Milwaukee County EMS between January 1<sup>st</sup>,2015 to December 31<sup>st</sup>, 2016. EMS naloxone administration and EMS impression of cardiac arrest etiology were used to classify expired patients into 2 groups: 1a) Received ≥ 1 Naloxone 1b) No Naloxone, and 2a) EMS-impression overdose, 2b) Not EMS-impression overdose. Milwaukee County Medical Examiner (MCME) opioid toxicology data was used as the reference standard and matched to EMS-treated OHCA patients that expired to determine the sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), and the negative predictive value (NPV) of both surrogate markers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1,654 OHCA cases were included; 112 (6.8%) received ≥ 1 Naloxone and 1,542 (93.2%) received No Naloxone; 60 (3.6%) were EMS-impression overdose and 1,594 (96.4%) were not EMS-impression overdose. Of the 525 opioid-associated deaths in the MCME Drug-related Death Database, 150 (28.6%) were OA-OHCA cases treated by EMS. The SN, SP, PPV, and NPV for EMS naloxone administration was 39%,96%, 52%, and 94% respectively. The SN, SP, PPV, and NPV for EMS- impression overdose was 27%, 99%, 68%, and 93% respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EMS naloxone administration and EMS- impression overdose had limited sensitivity for identifying OA- OHCA in expired patients in this large urban EMS system. Prehospital and public health researchers should identify improved methods for accurately classifying this OHCA subpopulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21052,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation","volume":" ","pages":"110569"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110569","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have used emergency medical services (EMS) naloxone administration and EMS overdose impression as surrogate markers to identify opioid-associated (OA) out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OA-OHCA). We evaluated the accuracy of these two surrogate markers using medical examiner post-mortem toxicology data in OHCA patients who died.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all adult (≥ 18) non-traumatic OHCA patients treated by Milwaukee County EMS between January 1st,2015 to December 31st, 2016. EMS naloxone administration and EMS impression of cardiac arrest etiology were used to classify expired patients into 2 groups: 1a) Received ≥ 1 Naloxone 1b) No Naloxone, and 2a) EMS-impression overdose, 2b) Not EMS-impression overdose. Milwaukee County Medical Examiner (MCME) opioid toxicology data was used as the reference standard and matched to EMS-treated OHCA patients that expired to determine the sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), and the negative predictive value (NPV) of both surrogate markers.

Results: 1,654 OHCA cases were included; 112 (6.8%) received ≥ 1 Naloxone and 1,542 (93.2%) received No Naloxone; 60 (3.6%) were EMS-impression overdose and 1,594 (96.4%) were not EMS-impression overdose. Of the 525 opioid-associated deaths in the MCME Drug-related Death Database, 150 (28.6%) were OA-OHCA cases treated by EMS. The SN, SP, PPV, and NPV for EMS naloxone administration was 39%,96%, 52%, and 94% respectively. The SN, SP, PPV, and NPV for EMS- impression overdose was 27%, 99%, 68%, and 93% respectively.

Conclusion: EMS naloxone administration and EMS- impression overdose had limited sensitivity for identifying OA- OHCA in expired patients in this large urban EMS system. Prehospital and public health researchers should identify improved methods for accurately classifying this OHCA subpopulation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation
Resuscitation 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
18.50%
发文量
556
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Resuscitation is a monthly international and interdisciplinary medical journal. The papers published deal with the aetiology, pathophysiology and prevention of cardiac arrest, resuscitation training, clinical resuscitation, and experimental resuscitation research, although papers relating to animal studies will be published only if they are of exceptional interest and related directly to clinical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Papers relating to trauma are published occasionally but the majority of these concern traumatic cardiac arrest.
期刊最新文献
Associations with Resolution of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Criteria on Out-of-Hospital 12-lead Electrocardiograms Following Resuscitation from Cardiac Arrest. Hesitate to Resuscitate? A cohort study of hesitation to initiate resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrests. Amiodarone in shockable cardiac arrest: light and shadow. Double or nothing: alternative defibrillation strategies reduces downtime in ventricular fibrillation. Evaluating the Accuracy of Surrogate Markers for Identifying Opioid-Associated Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1