To cut or not to cut? Extended mesenteric excision during intestinal resection does not impact the postoperative recurrence nor the postoperative complications in Crohn's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Techniques in Coloproctology Pub Date : 2025-03-08 DOI:10.1007/s10151-025-03110-w
M Topala, P Martinekova, A Rancz, D S Veres, K Lenti, P Miheller, B Erőss, P Hegyi, S Ábrahám
{"title":"To cut or not to cut? Extended mesenteric excision during intestinal resection does not impact the postoperative recurrence nor the postoperative complications in Crohn's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"M Topala, P Martinekova, A Rancz, D S Veres, K Lenti, P Miheller, B Erőss, P Hegyi, S Ábrahám","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03110-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The mesentery might be involved in the pathogenesis of Crohn's disease (CD). As a result of scarce and conflicting data, it is debatable whether removal during intestinal resections could influence postsurgical outcome. We aimed to investigate the association between the extent of mesenteric excision during intestinal resections and postoperative complications and recurrence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search in five databases on 29 July 2024 for studies reporting outcomes in patients with CD who underwent intestinal resections with extended mesenteric excision (EME) compared with limited mesenteric excision (LME). Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the random-effects model. We assessed the risk of bias using the ROBINS-I and RoB2 tool and evaluated the certainty of evidence according to the GRADE Working Group recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We retrieved data from six studies, covering 4590 patients. The pooled data showed no significant difference between EME and LME patients regarding surgical recurrence (OR 0.3; 95% CI 0.02-3.73; p = 0.176), overall postoperative complications (OR 0.78; 95% CI 0.33-1.82, p = 0.329), anastomotic leak (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.09-6.85, p = 0.722), surgical site infection (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.3-2.36, p = 0.539), reoperation rate (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.33-3.58, p = 0.783), or hospitalization (MD - 0.33 (95% CI - 1.8 to 1.15, p = 0.53). Individual studies reported similar results regarding 6 months follow-up endoscopic recurrence. The certainty of evidence was very low and low, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Extended mesenteric excision is not statistically associated with improved postoperative complications or postoperative recurrence. Results should be interpreted cautiously because of the small number of studies; hence, randomized, long-term, controlled trials are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"29 1","pages":"79"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11890256/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-025-03110-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The mesentery might be involved in the pathogenesis of Crohn's disease (CD). As a result of scarce and conflicting data, it is debatable whether removal during intestinal resections could influence postsurgical outcome. We aimed to investigate the association between the extent of mesenteric excision during intestinal resections and postoperative complications and recurrence.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search in five databases on 29 July 2024 for studies reporting outcomes in patients with CD who underwent intestinal resections with extended mesenteric excision (EME) compared with limited mesenteric excision (LME). Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the random-effects model. We assessed the risk of bias using the ROBINS-I and RoB2 tool and evaluated the certainty of evidence according to the GRADE Working Group recommendations.

Results: We retrieved data from six studies, covering 4590 patients. The pooled data showed no significant difference between EME and LME patients regarding surgical recurrence (OR 0.3; 95% CI 0.02-3.73; p = 0.176), overall postoperative complications (OR 0.78; 95% CI 0.33-1.82, p = 0.329), anastomotic leak (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.09-6.85, p = 0.722), surgical site infection (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.3-2.36, p = 0.539), reoperation rate (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.33-3.58, p = 0.783), or hospitalization (MD - 0.33 (95% CI - 1.8 to 1.15, p = 0.53). Individual studies reported similar results regarding 6 months follow-up endoscopic recurrence. The certainty of evidence was very low and low, respectively.

Conclusion: Extended mesenteric excision is not statistically associated with improved postoperative complications or postoperative recurrence. Results should be interpreted cautiously because of the small number of studies; hence, randomized, long-term, controlled trials are needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Techniques in Coloproctology
Techniques in Coloproctology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
176
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Techniques in Coloproctology is an international journal fully devoted to diagnostic and operative procedures carried out in the management of colorectal diseases. Imaging, clinical physiology, laparoscopy, open abdominal surgery and proctoperineology are the main topics covered by the journal. Reviews, original articles, technical notes and short communications with many detailed illustrations render this publication indispensable for coloproctologists and related specialists. Both surgeons and gastroenterologists are represented on the distinguished Editorial Board, together with pathologists, radiologists and basic scientists from all over the world. The journal is strongly recommended to those who wish to be updated on recent developments in the field, and improve the standards of their work. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1965 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted. Reports of animal experiments must state that the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care (NIH publication no. 86-23 revised 1985) were followed as were applicable national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals). The Editor-in-Chief reserves the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. Authors will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill such requirements.
期刊最新文献
Extended versus limited mesenteric excision in bowel resection for Crohn's disease: a meta-analysis and systematic review. To cut or not to cut? Extended mesenteric excision during intestinal resection does not impact the postoperative recurrence nor the postoperative complications in Crohn's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. First report of full colon transplantation as part of a visceral allograft. High and low take-off external prolapse phenotypes can be characterised preoperatively on defaecation proctography. Pain, opioid consumption, and epidural anesthesia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease undergoing laparoscopic subtotal colectomy: an observational cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1