Machine learning to detect Alzheimer's disease with data on drugs and diagnoses.

Johanna Wallensten, Caroline Wachtler, Nenad Bogdanovic, Anna Olofsson, Miia Kivipelto, Linus Jönsson, Predrag Petrovic, Axel C Carlsson
{"title":"Machine learning to detect Alzheimer's disease with data on drugs and diagnoses.","authors":"Johanna Wallensten, Caroline Wachtler, Nenad Bogdanovic, Anna Olofsson, Miia Kivipelto, Linus Jönsson, Predrag Petrovic, Axel C Carlsson","doi":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Integrating machine learning with medical records offers potential for early detection of Alzheimer's disease (AD), enabling timely interventions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning in constructing a predictive model for AD, designed to predict AD with data up to three years before diagnosis. Using clinical data, including prior diagnoses and medical treatments, we sought to enhance sensitivity and specificity in diagnostic procedures. A second aim was to identify the most important factors in the machine learning models, as these may be important predictors of AD.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study employed Stochastic Gradient Boosting, a machine learning method, to identify diagnoses predictive of AD using primary healthcare data. The analyses were stratified by sex and age groups.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study included individuals within Region Stockholm, Sweden, using medical records from 2010 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The study analyzed clinical data for individuals over the age of 40. Patients with an AD diagnosis (ICD-10-SE codes F00 or G30) during 2010-2012 were excluded to ensure prospective modeling. In total, AD was identified in 3,407 patients aged 41-69 years and 25,796 patients aged over 69.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>The machine learning model ranked predictive diagnoses, with performance assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Known and novel predictors were evaluated for their contribution to AD risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AUC values ranged from 0.748 (women aged 41-69) to 0.816 (women over 69), with men across age groups falling within this range. Sensitivity and specificity ranged from 0.73 to 0.79 and 0.66 to 0.79, respectively, across age and gender groups. Negative predictive values were consistently high (≥0.954), while positive predictive values were lower (0.199-0.351). Additionally, we confirmed known risk factors as predictors and identified novel predictors that warrant further investigation. Key predictors included medical observations, cognitive symptoms, antidepressant treatment, visit frequency, and vitamin B12/folic acid treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Machine learning applied to clinical data shows promise in predicting AD, with robust model performance across age and sex groups. The findings confirmed known risk factors, such as depression and vitamin B12 deficiency, while also identifying novel predictors that may guide future research. Clinically, this approach could enhance early detection and risk stratification, facilitating timely interventions and improving patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"100115"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Integrating machine learning with medical records offers potential for early detection of Alzheimer's disease (AD), enabling timely interventions.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning in constructing a predictive model for AD, designed to predict AD with data up to three years before diagnosis. Using clinical data, including prior diagnoses and medical treatments, we sought to enhance sensitivity and specificity in diagnostic procedures. A second aim was to identify the most important factors in the machine learning models, as these may be important predictors of AD.

Design: The study employed Stochastic Gradient Boosting, a machine learning method, to identify diagnoses predictive of AD using primary healthcare data. The analyses were stratified by sex and age groups.

Setting: The study included individuals within Region Stockholm, Sweden, using medical records from 2010 to 2022.

Participants: The study analyzed clinical data for individuals over the age of 40. Patients with an AD diagnosis (ICD-10-SE codes F00 or G30) during 2010-2012 were excluded to ensure prospective modeling. In total, AD was identified in 3,407 patients aged 41-69 years and 25,796 patients aged over 69.

Measurements: The machine learning model ranked predictive diagnoses, with performance assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Known and novel predictors were evaluated for their contribution to AD risk.

Results: AUC values ranged from 0.748 (women aged 41-69) to 0.816 (women over 69), with men across age groups falling within this range. Sensitivity and specificity ranged from 0.73 to 0.79 and 0.66 to 0.79, respectively, across age and gender groups. Negative predictive values were consistently high (≥0.954), while positive predictive values were lower (0.199-0.351). Additionally, we confirmed known risk factors as predictors and identified novel predictors that warrant further investigation. Key predictors included medical observations, cognitive symptoms, antidepressant treatment, visit frequency, and vitamin B12/folic acid treatment.

Conclusions: Machine learning applied to clinical data shows promise in predicting AD, with robust model performance across age and sex groups. The findings confirmed known risk factors, such as depression and vitamin B12 deficiency, while also identifying novel predictors that may guide future research. Clinically, this approach could enhance early detection and risk stratification, facilitating timely interventions and improving patient outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The JPAD Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer’Disease will publish reviews, original research articles and short reports to improve our knowledge in the field of Alzheimer prevention including: neurosciences, biomarkers, imaging, epidemiology, public health, physical cognitive exercise, nutrition, risk and protective factors, drug development, trials design, and heath economic outcomes.JPAD will publish also the meeting abstracts from Clinical Trial on Alzheimer Disease (CTAD) and will be distributed both in paper and online version worldwide.We hope that JPAD with your contribution will play a role in the development of Alzheimer prevention.
期刊最新文献
Distinct trajectories of subjective cognitive decline before diagnosis of neurocognitive disorders: Longitudinal modelling over 18 years. Machine learning to detect Alzheimer's disease with data on drugs and diagnoses. The disease burden, risk factors and future predictions of Alzheimer's disease and other types of dementia in Asia from 1990 to 2021. Healthy dietary patterns in relation to cognitive performance and Alzheimer's disease mortality. Mitochondrial dysfunction as the missing link between circadian syndrome and dementia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1