"It's Everyone's Problem": Institutionalising Multisectoral Action for Maternal Health in Meghalaya, India.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Annals of Global Health Pub Date : 2025-03-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5334/aogh.4587
Sapna Desai, Sharmada Sivaram, S Ramkumar, Patricia Dohtdong, Ankit Nanda, Sowmya Ramesh, Sampath Kumar
{"title":"<i>\"It's Everyone's Problem\":</i> Institutionalising Multisectoral Action for Maternal Health in Meghalaya, India.","authors":"Sapna Desai, Sharmada Sivaram, S Ramkumar, Patricia Dohtdong, Ankit Nanda, Sowmya Ramesh, Sampath Kumar","doi":"10.5334/aogh.4587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> There is widespread agreement on the potential of multisectoral action to address the social determinants of maternal health. We conducted an implementation research study in Meghalaya, a northeastern Indian state with a high burden of maternal mortality where the government initiated \"Rescue Mission\" to strengthen the health system and to address underlying determinants to improve maternal health indicators. The initiative was grounded in building state capability and decentralised leadership. <i>Objective:</i> We developed a theory of change and examined implementation barriers and enablers through an implementation research study with government and community actors and institutions. <i>Methods:</i> We conducted multiple rounds of qualitative data collection over a period of eighteen months across six districts. Participants included primary care providers in the public health system and frontline workers in thirty sampled facilities. We also interviewed officials across three government departments, observed meetings and met regularly in a feedback loop with government. Data were analysed thematically and synthesised according to pathways of change. <i>Findings:</i> The state institutionalised multisectoral collaboration across governance levels through building technical and adaptive leadership. Processes included joint meetings at the facility, district and state levels to develop action plans and facilitate collaboration, community engagement through frontline workers and decentralised use of data. Strength of participation by different sectors varied widely; non‑health cadres reported challenges such as being accountable to multiple departments. Political priority and administrative leadership were the key elements of the State's ability to implement a multisectoral approach. Overall, health outcomes improved and the State largely achieved its commitment to building technical skills, but also recognised the need for further investments to develop a sense of purpose amongst government officials. <i>Conclusions:</i> Meghalaya's experience in multisectoral collaboration demonstrates the potential of health systems reform grounded in a state capabilities enhancement approach, with a focus on participation and building decentralised leadership.</p>","PeriodicalId":48857,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Global Health","volume":"91 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11887465/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.4587","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is widespread agreement on the potential of multisectoral action to address the social determinants of maternal health. We conducted an implementation research study in Meghalaya, a northeastern Indian state with a high burden of maternal mortality where the government initiated "Rescue Mission" to strengthen the health system and to address underlying determinants to improve maternal health indicators. The initiative was grounded in building state capability and decentralised leadership. Objective: We developed a theory of change and examined implementation barriers and enablers through an implementation research study with government and community actors and institutions. Methods: We conducted multiple rounds of qualitative data collection over a period of eighteen months across six districts. Participants included primary care providers in the public health system and frontline workers in thirty sampled facilities. We also interviewed officials across three government departments, observed meetings and met regularly in a feedback loop with government. Data were analysed thematically and synthesised according to pathways of change. Findings: The state institutionalised multisectoral collaboration across governance levels through building technical and adaptive leadership. Processes included joint meetings at the facility, district and state levels to develop action plans and facilitate collaboration, community engagement through frontline workers and decentralised use of data. Strength of participation by different sectors varied widely; non‑health cadres reported challenges such as being accountable to multiple departments. Political priority and administrative leadership were the key elements of the State's ability to implement a multisectoral approach. Overall, health outcomes improved and the State largely achieved its commitment to building technical skills, but also recognised the need for further investments to develop a sense of purpose amongst government officials. Conclusions: Meghalaya's experience in multisectoral collaboration demonstrates the potential of health systems reform grounded in a state capabilities enhancement approach, with a focus on participation and building decentralised leadership.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“这是每个人的问题”:将印度梅加拉亚邦孕产妇保健多部门行动制度化。
背景:人们普遍认为有可能采取多部门行动来解决孕产妇保健的社会决定因素。我们在印度东北部孕产妇死亡率高的梅加拉亚邦开展了一项实施研究,政府启动了“救援任务”,以加强卫生系统,解决改善孕产妇健康指标的潜在决定因素。该倡议的基础是建立国家能力和权力下放的领导。目的:我们发展了一种变革理论,并通过与政府、社区行为者和机构的实施研究来检查实施障碍和推动因素。方法:我们在六个地区进行了为期18个月的多轮定性数据收集。参与者包括公共卫生系统的初级保健提供者和30个抽样机构的一线工作人员。我们还采访了三个政府部门的官员,观察了会议,并定期与政府进行反馈。数据按主题进行分析,并根据变化途径进行综合。研究发现:国家通过建立技术和适应性领导,将跨治理层次的多部门合作制度化。过程包括在设施、地区和州一级召开联合会议,制定行动计划,促进合作,通过一线工作人员进行社区参与,并分散使用数据。不同部门的参与程度差别很大;非保健干部报告了向多个部门负责等挑战。政治优先和行政领导是国家执行多部门办法的能力的关键因素。总体而言,保健成果有所改善,国家在很大程度上实现了培养技术技能的承诺,但也认识到需要进一步投资,以培养政府官员的使命感。结论:梅加拉亚邦在多部门合作方面的经验表明,以国家能力增强方法为基础的卫生系统改革具有潜力,重点是参与和建立权力下放的领导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Global Health
Annals of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: ANNALS OF GLOBAL HEALTH is a peer-reviewed, open access journal focused on global health. The journal’s mission is to advance and disseminate knowledge of global health. Its goals are improve the health and well-being of all people, advance health equity and promote wise stewardship of the earth’s environment. The journal is published by the Boston College Global Public Health Program. It was founded in 1934 by the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai as the Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine. It is a partner journal of the Consortium of Universities for Global Health.
期刊最新文献
Use of Artificial Intelligence in Public Health Education for Pandemic Preparedness and Response. Surveillance of Non-Malignant Asbestos-Related Diseases in an Exposed Population: A Scoping Review. The Architecture of Decolonial Partnerships in University Global Health Program Development. Maternal Cancer Mortality and Orphanhood: A Neglected Global Health and Equity Challenge. Transforming Healthcare: Mozambique's Pioneering Integrative Medicine Course.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1