Attitudes toward patient engagement in clinical pain research: Insights from individuals with chronic pain in the United States

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105358
Katherine J. Holzer , Haley E. Bernstein , Christin Veasley , Simon Haroutounian , Dagmar Amtmann , Aderonke Bamgbose Pederson , Bryce B. Reeve , Dennis C. Turk , Robert H. Dworkin , Dale J. Langford
{"title":"Attitudes toward patient engagement in clinical pain research: Insights from individuals with chronic pain in the United States","authors":"Katherine J. Holzer ,&nbsp;Haley E. Bernstein ,&nbsp;Christin Veasley ,&nbsp;Simon Haroutounian ,&nbsp;Dagmar Amtmann ,&nbsp;Aderonke Bamgbose Pederson ,&nbsp;Bryce B. Reeve ,&nbsp;Dennis C. Turk ,&nbsp;Robert H. Dworkin ,&nbsp;Dale J. Langford","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The value of engaging people with lived experience into chronic pain research is becoming increasingly recognized, yet the perspectives of individuals with chronic pain who have not previously participated in research are underexplored. This study aims to fill this gap by assessing the attitudes, preferences, and barriers related to patient engagement among adults living with chronic pain in the United States (US). An online survey was developed in collaboration with an advisory board and community engagement studio and distributed through Qualtrics panels from December 2023-January 2024. Quotas for age, gender, and race were employed to reach a representative sample for each of these variables based on the 2020 US census.<sup>1,2</sup> Of the 505 participants, 267 reported chronic low back pain (53%) and 144 had headaches or migraines (22%). A majority (65%−79%) were familiar with medical research, and 64% (n = 327) expressed interest in engaging as patient partners. Key facilitators for engagement included the desire to help others and learn about their condition, while compensation was also an important motivator. Barriers were time constraints, lack of payment, and worry about privacy. Younger participants (Chi-square p = 0.04) and those with higher education (Chi-square p = 0.01) were more likely to express interest in research partnerships. Strategies to enhance patient engagement should focus on reducing barriers and providing clear, meaningful opportunities for engagement, potentially increasing both recruitment and retention in chronic pain research. Future research should explore these dynamics further and consider international perspectives to develop comprehensive patient engagement strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Perspective</h3><div>This study surveys over 500 individuals with chronic pain to understand their attitudes towards engagement in clinical pain research. It identifies key facilitators and barriers, such as time constraints and low compensation, and aims to refine strategies to enhance patient partner engagement and representation in clinical pain research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 105358"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526590025005851","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The value of engaging people with lived experience into chronic pain research is becoming increasingly recognized, yet the perspectives of individuals with chronic pain who have not previously participated in research are underexplored. This study aims to fill this gap by assessing the attitudes, preferences, and barriers related to patient engagement among adults living with chronic pain in the United States (US). An online survey was developed in collaboration with an advisory board and community engagement studio and distributed through Qualtrics panels from December 2023-January 2024. Quotas for age, gender, and race were employed to reach a representative sample for each of these variables based on the 2020 US census.1,2 Of the 505 participants, 267 reported chronic low back pain (53%) and 144 had headaches or migraines (22%). A majority (65%−79%) were familiar with medical research, and 64% (n = 327) expressed interest in engaging as patient partners. Key facilitators for engagement included the desire to help others and learn about their condition, while compensation was also an important motivator. Barriers were time constraints, lack of payment, and worry about privacy. Younger participants (Chi-square p = 0.04) and those with higher education (Chi-square p = 0.01) were more likely to express interest in research partnerships. Strategies to enhance patient engagement should focus on reducing barriers and providing clear, meaningful opportunities for engagement, potentially increasing both recruitment and retention in chronic pain research. Future research should explore these dynamics further and consider international perspectives to develop comprehensive patient engagement strategies.

Perspective

This study surveys over 500 individuals with chronic pain to understand their attitudes towards engagement in clinical pain research. It identifies key facilitators and barriers, such as time constraints and low compensation, and aims to refine strategies to enhance patient partner engagement and representation in clinical pain research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对临床疼痛研究中患者参与的态度:来自美国慢性疼痛患者的见解。
让有生活经验的人参与慢性疼痛研究的价值越来越得到认可,然而,以前没有参与研究的慢性疼痛患者的观点还没有得到充分的探索。本研究旨在通过评估美国慢性疼痛成人患者参与相关的态度、偏好和障碍来填补这一空白。Qualtrics与咨询委员会和社区参与工作室合作开展了一项在线调查,并于2023年12月至2024年1月通过Qualtrics小组分发。在2020年美国人口普查的基础上,采用年龄、性别和种族的配额来获得这些变量的代表性样本。在505名参与者中,267人报告慢性腰痛(53%),144人患有头痛或偏头痛(22%)。大多数人(65%-79%)熟悉医学研究,64% (n = 327)表示有兴趣成为患者合作伙伴。促进员工参与的关键因素包括帮助他人和了解他人状况的愿望,而薪酬也是一个重要的激励因素。障碍是时间限制、支付不足和对隐私的担忧。年轻的参与者(卡方p = 0.04)和受过高等教育的参与者(卡方p = 0.01)更有可能表达对研究伙伴关系的兴趣。加强患者参与的策略应侧重于减少障碍并提供明确、有意义的参与机会,从而潜在地增加慢性疼痛研究的招募和保留。未来的研究应该进一步探索这些动态,并考虑国际视角来制定全面的患者参与策略。观点:本研究调查了500多名慢性疼痛患者,以了解他们对参与临床疼痛研究的态度。它确定了关键的促进因素和障碍,如时间限制和低补偿,并旨在完善策略,以提高患者合作伙伴的参与和代表性在临床疼痛研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain
Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.50%
发文量
441
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain publishes original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. Articles selected for publication in the Journal are most commonly reports of original clinical research or reports of original basic research. In addition, invited critical reviews, including meta analyses of drugs for pain management, invited commentaries on reviews, and exceptional case studies are published in the Journal. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals to publish original research.
期刊最新文献
Letter to the Editor Re: Effects of centrally acting analgesics on resting-state electroencephalography biomarker candidates of chronic pain. Heterogeneity matters: Interpretating amputation outcomes in CRPS. Quality matters: Interpreting amputation outcomes in CRPS - Authors reply. Re: Letter to the Editor Re: Effects of centrally acting analgesics on resting-state electroencephalography biomarker candidates of chronic pain. Corrigendum to "Exposure to perinatal trauma modifies nociception and gene expression in the prefrontal cortex and hypothalamus of adolescent rats" [J Pain 38 (2025) 104762].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1