Value of Information Sharing in Using Healthcare Information Technology: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Healthcare Management Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1097/JHM-D-24-00155
Adelina Gnanlet, Min Choi
{"title":"Value of Information Sharing in Using Healthcare Information Technology: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Adelina Gnanlet, Min Choi","doi":"10.1097/JHM-D-24-00155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Goal: </strong>The primary goal of this systematic review is to assess the impact of healthcare information technology (HIT) applications on information sharing within and between healthcare organizations (HCOs) and their associated performance outcomes. This study is motivated by the significant growth in electronic health record adoption and other advanced technologies spurred by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009. Despite this growth, there remains a gap in understanding where HIT adds value and how it affects various performance outcomes, particularly through information sharing in the healthcare sector.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA-P 2020) methodology, this review focuses on empirical studies that examine the use and adoption of HIT in healthcare settings. The inclusion criteria targeted studies evaluating the impact of information sharing within or among HCOs through the use of HIT. The 66 papers that met our criteria were analyzed using Porter's value chain framework, which examines both intraorganizational and interorganizational activities to understand where value is created.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>The review reveals that HIT applications primarily enhance internal operations within HCOs, with 55% of the studies focusing on this aspect. In contrast, information sharing across multiple HCOs remains limited, with only 14% of the studies addressing this area. While quality improvement and cost reduction are the most frequently mentioned expected outcomes, surprisingly, productivity emerges as the most studied outcome variable, present in 33% of the articles. Most studies were conducted in the United States (67%), and physicians were the most frequently studied users of HIT, followed by nurses and other designated staff.</p><p><strong>Practical applications: </strong>The findings highlight the need for broader connectivity across the healthcare ecosystem. While private networks like Epic Cosmos and CommonWell facilitate data exchange, they remain confined within specific electronic health record systems, creating silos. The Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement offers a more comprehensive approach, promoting universal and scalable information sharing across all stakeholders. To realize this potential, healthcare leaders must actively pursue the Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement integration, standardize performance metrics, and foster collaboration to enhance patient care and operational efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":51633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Management","volume":"70 2","pages":"108-125"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHM-D-24-00155","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Goal: The primary goal of this systematic review is to assess the impact of healthcare information technology (HIT) applications on information sharing within and between healthcare organizations (HCOs) and their associated performance outcomes. This study is motivated by the significant growth in electronic health record adoption and other advanced technologies spurred by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009. Despite this growth, there remains a gap in understanding where HIT adds value and how it affects various performance outcomes, particularly through information sharing in the healthcare sector.

Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA-P 2020) methodology, this review focuses on empirical studies that examine the use and adoption of HIT in healthcare settings. The inclusion criteria targeted studies evaluating the impact of information sharing within or among HCOs through the use of HIT. The 66 papers that met our criteria were analyzed using Porter's value chain framework, which examines both intraorganizational and interorganizational activities to understand where value is created.

Principal findings: The review reveals that HIT applications primarily enhance internal operations within HCOs, with 55% of the studies focusing on this aspect. In contrast, information sharing across multiple HCOs remains limited, with only 14% of the studies addressing this area. While quality improvement and cost reduction are the most frequently mentioned expected outcomes, surprisingly, productivity emerges as the most studied outcome variable, present in 33% of the articles. Most studies were conducted in the United States (67%), and physicians were the most frequently studied users of HIT, followed by nurses and other designated staff.

Practical applications: The findings highlight the need for broader connectivity across the healthcare ecosystem. While private networks like Epic Cosmos and CommonWell facilitate data exchange, they remain confined within specific electronic health record systems, creating silos. The Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement offers a more comprehensive approach, promoting universal and scalable information sharing across all stakeholders. To realize this potential, healthcare leaders must actively pursue the Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement integration, standardize performance metrics, and foster collaboration to enhance patient care and operational efficiency.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信息共享在使用医疗信息技术中的价值:系统回顾
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
A Point-Cloud Deep Learning Framework for Prediction of Fluid Flow Fields on Irregular Geometries
IF 0 ArXivPub Date : 2020-10-15 DOI: 10.1063/5.0033376
A. Kashefi, Davis Rempe, L. Guibas
A focus on molecular representation learning for the prediction of chemical properties
IF 8.4 1区 化学Chemical SciencePub Date : 2024-03-25 DOI: 10.1039/D4SC90043J
Yonatan Harnik and Anat Milo
来源期刊
Journal of Healthcare Management
Journal of Healthcare Management HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The Journal of Healthcare Management is the official journal of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Six times per year, JHM offers timely healthcare management articles that inform and guide executives, managers, educators, and researchers. JHM also contains regular columns written by experts and practitioners in the field that discuss management-related topics and industry trends. Each issue presents an interview with a leading executive.
期刊最新文献
Aligning Federal Grant Review Processes with Academic Standards: A Call for Reform. Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Reduce Neuroscience ICU Length of Stay. Financial Performance of Hospital Telehealth Adopters, Nonadopters, and Switchers: A Rural-Urban Comparison. Kimberly Enard, PhD, FACHE, Associate Professor in the College for Public Health and Social Justice and MHA Program Director at Saint Louis University. Factors Associated with Healthcare Leaders' Perceived Self-Efficacy During Crises.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1