Public versus private healthcare systems in the OECD area- a broad evaluation of performance.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS European Journal of Health Economics Pub Date : 2025-03-08 DOI:10.1007/s10198-025-01767-6
Per Molander
{"title":"Public versus private healthcare systems in the OECD area- a broad evaluation of performance.","authors":"Per Molander","doi":"10.1007/s10198-025-01767-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Healthcare systems can be categorised along the public/private axis into two main types: publicly administered systems and systems based on compulsory health insurance provided by the private sector. Within the OECD area, the latter group has expanded over time, particularly with the inclusion of new member states from Eastern Europe and Central and Latin America. This study compares the efficiency of these two models across the 38 member countries, utilising a broad spectrum of performance indicators developed by the OECD secretariat. Data from the most recent available year, typically 2021, were analysed. On average, performance improves with an increase in healthcare budgets; however, further enhancements come at rising costs. The analysis concludes that there is no evidence supporting the hypothesis that transitioning from a publicly administered system to a privately dominated system will enhance efficiency. By contrast, there is strong evidence that overall efficiency increases with the public share of financing. These conclusions also hold true for the more restricted group of OECD countries in Europe.</p>","PeriodicalId":51416,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Health Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-025-01767-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Healthcare systems can be categorised along the public/private axis into two main types: publicly administered systems and systems based on compulsory health insurance provided by the private sector. Within the OECD area, the latter group has expanded over time, particularly with the inclusion of new member states from Eastern Europe and Central and Latin America. This study compares the efficiency of these two models across the 38 member countries, utilising a broad spectrum of performance indicators developed by the OECD secretariat. Data from the most recent available year, typically 2021, were analysed. On average, performance improves with an increase in healthcare budgets; however, further enhancements come at rising costs. The analysis concludes that there is no evidence supporting the hypothesis that transitioning from a publicly administered system to a privately dominated system will enhance efficiency. By contrast, there is strong evidence that overall efficiency increases with the public share of financing. These conclusions also hold true for the more restricted group of OECD countries in Europe.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Health Economics is a journal of Health Economics and associated disciplines. The growing demand for health economics and the introduction of new guidelines in various European countries were the motivation to generate a highly scientific and at the same time practice oriented journal considering the requirements of various health care systems in Europe. The international scientific board of opinion leaders guarantees high-quality, peer-reviewed publications as well as articles for pragmatic approaches in the field of health economics. We intend to cover all aspects of health economics: • Basics of health economic approaches and methods • Pharmacoeconomics • Health Care Systems • Pricing and Reimbursement Systems • Quality-of-Life-Studies The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements. Officially cited as: Eur J Health Econ
期刊最新文献
Public versus private healthcare systems in the OECD area- a broad evaluation of performance. Test-retest reliability of the Online Elicitation of Personal Utility Functions (OPUF) approach for valuing the EQ-HWB-S. Long-term returns to local health-care spending. Monetary value of health-a practical decision-making framework combining equity considerations and WTP. Workload and short sickness absences in a cohort of Finnish hospital employees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1