Evaluating the Risk of Duodenoscope-Associated Colonization (DAC) and Duodenoscope-Associated Infection (DAI): A Prospective Observational Study.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Journal of Hospital Infection Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2025.02.014
Koen van der Ploeg, Corné H W Klaassen, Saskia H J Renkens, Bibi C G C Mason-Slingerland, Juliëtte A Severin, Marco J Bruno, Margreet C Vos
{"title":"Evaluating the Risk of Duodenoscope-Associated Colonization (DAC) and Duodenoscope-Associated Infection (DAI): A Prospective Observational Study.","authors":"Koen van der Ploeg, Corné H W Klaassen, Saskia H J Renkens, Bibi C G C Mason-Slingerland, Juliëtte A Severin, Marco J Bruno, Margreet C Vos","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2025.02.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>The risk of duodenoscope-associated colonisations (DAC) and infections (DAI) after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with a contaminated duodenoscope remains unknown. Determining the incidence of these events is crucial for developing prevention strategies. This study aimed to assess the incidence of DACs and DAIs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational study included adult patients who underwent ERCP from January 2022 to December 2023. Duodenoscopes were sampled prior to each procedure. Contamination was defined as the presence of microorganisms of gut or oral origin (MGO). Post-ERCP, upon availability of culture results, patients exposed to contaminated duodenoscopes were asked to provide a stool sample and were followed for six months. Microorganisms isolated from patient samples and clinical cultures were compared with those found in the duodenoscopes. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was used to confirm DAC or DAI.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Among 341 ERCP patients, 73 (21.4%) procedures involved MGO-contaminated duodenoscopes. No duodenoscope-associated outbreaks occurred during the study. Stool samples were returned by 45 of the 73 patients (61.6%). Additionally, 80 MGOs from clinical cultures and 37 residual samples were stored. WGS was performed on eight duodenoscope-patient microorganism pairs from six patients. No DAC or DAI cases were detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a non-outbreak setting, supported by monthly routine microbiological surveillance and a quarantine protocol for duodenoscopes, the risk of DAC and DAI appears low. These findings suggest limited value in intensive patient surveillance for DACs/DAIs. Further research is warranted to confirm these results and address knowledge gaps regarding risk factors for DACs and DAIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2025.02.014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and study aims: The risk of duodenoscope-associated colonisations (DAC) and infections (DAI) after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with a contaminated duodenoscope remains unknown. Determining the incidence of these events is crucial for developing prevention strategies. This study aimed to assess the incidence of DACs and DAIs.

Methods: This prospective observational study included adult patients who underwent ERCP from January 2022 to December 2023. Duodenoscopes were sampled prior to each procedure. Contamination was defined as the presence of microorganisms of gut or oral origin (MGO). Post-ERCP, upon availability of culture results, patients exposed to contaminated duodenoscopes were asked to provide a stool sample and were followed for six months. Microorganisms isolated from patient samples and clinical cultures were compared with those found in the duodenoscopes. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was used to confirm DAC or DAI.

Findings: Among 341 ERCP patients, 73 (21.4%) procedures involved MGO-contaminated duodenoscopes. No duodenoscope-associated outbreaks occurred during the study. Stool samples were returned by 45 of the 73 patients (61.6%). Additionally, 80 MGOs from clinical cultures and 37 residual samples were stored. WGS was performed on eight duodenoscope-patient microorganism pairs from six patients. No DAC or DAI cases were detected.

Conclusion: In a non-outbreak setting, supported by monthly routine microbiological surveillance and a quarantine protocol for duodenoscopes, the risk of DAC and DAI appears low. These findings suggest limited value in intensive patient surveillance for DACs/DAIs. Further research is warranted to confirm these results and address knowledge gaps regarding risk factors for DACs and DAIs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hospital Infection
Journal of Hospital Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
271
审稿时长
19 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hospital Infection is the editorially independent scientific publication of the Healthcare Infection Society. The aim of the Journal is to publish high quality research and information relating to infection prevention and control that is relevant to an international audience. The Journal welcomes submissions that relate to all aspects of infection prevention and control in healthcare settings. This includes submissions that: provide new insight into the epidemiology, surveillance, or prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare settings; provide new insight into cleaning, disinfection and decontamination; provide new insight into the design of healthcare premises; describe novel aspects of outbreaks of infection; throw light on techniques for effective antimicrobial stewardship; describe novel techniques (laboratory-based or point of care) for the detection of infection or antimicrobial resistance in the healthcare setting, particularly if these can be used to facilitate infection prevention and control; improve understanding of the motivations of safe healthcare behaviour, or describe techniques for achieving behavioural and cultural change; improve understanding of the use of IT systems in infection surveillance and prevention and control.
期刊最新文献
Impact of single-use oral care sets on reducing ventilator-associated pneumonia. among ICU patients: a multi-center study. Implementation considerations for integrated face and respiratory protection: a qualitative study. Risk factors for surgical site infection after hip replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The impact of the COVID-19 national health alert on Enterobacteriaceae hospital outbreaks in Chile. Pneumatic tube transport system carries made from urethan contaminated with environmental pathogens.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1