Predicting the Regenerative Potential of Retinal Ganglion Cells Based on Developmental Growth Trajectories.

Joana Rf Santos, Chen Li, Lien Andries, Luca Masin, Bram Nuttin, Katja Reinhard, Lieve Moons, Hermann Cuntz, Karl Farrow
{"title":"Predicting the Regenerative Potential of Retinal Ganglion Cells Based on Developmental Growth Trajectories.","authors":"Joana Rf Santos, Chen Li, Lien Andries, Luca Masin, Bram Nuttin, Katja Reinhard, Lieve Moons, Hermann Cuntz, Karl Farrow","doi":"10.1101/2025.02.28.640775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Retinal ganglion cells in the mammalian central nervous system fail to regenerate following injury, with the capacity to survive and regrow varying by cell type. This variability may be linked to differences in developmental programs that overlap with the genetic pathways that mediate regeneration. To explore this correlation, we compared the structural changes in mouse retinal ganglion cells during development with those occurring after axonal injury. The dendritic trees of over 1,000 ganglion cells were reconstructed at different developmental stages, revealing that each cell type follows a distinct timeline. ON-sustained (sONα) cells reach maturity by P14, whereas ON-transient (tONα) cells achieve their maximum dendritic size by P10. Modeling of the dendritic changes indicate that while sONα and tONα follow similar growth programs the onset of growth was later in sONα. After optic nerve crush, the remodeling of dendritic architecture differed between the two cell-types. sONα cells exhibited rapid dendritic shrinkage, while tONα cells shrank more gradually with changes in branching features. Following injury, sONα cells reverted to an earlier developmental state than tONα cells. In addition, after co-deletion of PTEN and SOC3, neurons appeared to regress further back in developmental time. Our results provide evidence that a ganglion cell's resilience to injury and regenerative potential is predicted by its maturation timeline. Understanding these intrinsic differences could inform targeted neuroprotective interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":519960,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11888416/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.28.640775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Retinal ganglion cells in the mammalian central nervous system fail to regenerate following injury, with the capacity to survive and regrow varying by cell type. This variability may be linked to differences in developmental programs that overlap with the genetic pathways that mediate regeneration. To explore this correlation, we compared the structural changes in mouse retinal ganglion cells during development with those occurring after axonal injury. The dendritic trees of over 1,000 ganglion cells were reconstructed at different developmental stages, revealing that each cell type follows a distinct timeline. ON-sustained (sONα) cells reach maturity by P14, whereas ON-transient (tONα) cells achieve their maximum dendritic size by P10. Modeling of the dendritic changes indicate that while sONα and tONα follow similar growth programs the onset of growth was later in sONα. After optic nerve crush, the remodeling of dendritic architecture differed between the two cell-types. sONα cells exhibited rapid dendritic shrinkage, while tONα cells shrank more gradually with changes in branching features. Following injury, sONα cells reverted to an earlier developmental state than tONα cells. In addition, after co-deletion of PTEN and SOC3, neurons appeared to regress further back in developmental time. Our results provide evidence that a ganglion cell's resilience to injury and regenerative potential is predicted by its maturation timeline. Understanding these intrinsic differences could inform targeted neuroprotective interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于发育生长轨迹的视网膜神经节细胞再生潜能预测。
哺乳动物中枢神经系统中的视网膜神经节细胞在损伤后不能再生,其存活和再生的能力因细胞类型而异。这种可变性可能与发育程序的差异有关,这些差异与介导再生的遗传途径重叠。为了探索这种相关性,我们比较了小鼠视网膜神经节细胞在发育过程中的结构变化与轴突损伤后的结构变化。在不同的发育阶段重建了1000多个神经节细胞的树突状树,揭示了每种细胞类型遵循不同的时间轴。on -持续(sONα)细胞在P14时成熟,而on -瞬时(tONα)细胞在P10时达到最大树突大小。树突变化的建模表明,虽然sONα和tONα遵循相似的生长程序,但sONα的生长开始较晚。视神经挤压后,树突结构的重构在两种细胞类型之间存在差异。sONα细胞表现出快速的树突收缩,而tONα细胞则表现出缓慢的收缩,并伴有分支特征的变化。损伤后,sONα细胞恢复到比tONα细胞更早的发育状态。此外,PTEN和SOC3共缺失后,神经元在发育时间上似乎进一步倒退。我们的研究结果提供了证据,证明神经节细胞对损伤的恢复能力和再生潜力是由其成熟时间表预测的。了解这些内在差异可以为有针对性的神经保护干预提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SLC33A1 exports oxidized glutathione to maintain endoplasmic reticulum redox homeostasis. Activation of PPARγ redirects fibro-adipogenic progenitors to replace ectopic bone with fat in models of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva and trauma-induced heterotopic ossification. Goofy/123Cre Lineage Tracing Differentiates Olfactory and Vomeronasal Neurons from GnRH-1 and Terminal Nerve Neurons During Neuronal Migration and Reveals Additional Olfactory Placode-Derived Cells in the Brain. Living Cells Employ Ubiquitin-Proteasomal System and Nucleotide Excision Repair Pathways to Remove Reactive Oxygen Species-Induced DNA-Protein Crosslinks (ROS-DPCs). Rehabilitation drives functional reorganization of intact corticospinal-supraspinal projections following partial spinal cord injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1