David J. Sandberg, Ann Frisén, Py Liv Eriksson, Moin Syed
{"title":"Who Benefits Most? Personality Traits as Predictors of Identity Intervention Outcomes in Adolescence","authors":"David J. Sandberg, Ann Frisén, Py Liv Eriksson, Moin Syed","doi":"10.1007/s10964-025-02163-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Interventions focused on adolescents’ identity development have shown promising results, but questions remain as to which adolescents benefit most from them. This preregistered study examined how personality traits (Big Five domains and higher-order meta-traits) moderate adolescents’ responsiveness to the Identity Project, a school-based intervention supporting ethnic-racial identity development. A total of 509 adolescents from 22 classrooms in the southwestern regions of Sweden participated in an intervention and control group design (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 16.28; <i>SD</i><sub>age</sub> = 0.80; 66% female; 51% migration background). Results indicate that extraversion, a personality trait linked to socialization and external reward-seeking, as well as plasticity, a meta-trait linked to adaptability and exploration, both enhanced adolescents’ responsiveness to the intervention in terms of ethnic-racial identity exploration. Moderation differences were found between genders, but not between migration and non-migration backgrounds. With personality traits and meta-traits being revealed as predictors of intervention effectiveness, the study highlights how not all adolescents benefit equally from interventions targeting identity processes. By adapting interventions like the Identity Project to also reach the introverted or less plastic adolescents, it is possible to make them more inclusive, thus broadening their reach and impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":17624,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Youth and Adolescence","volume":"132 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Youth and Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-025-02163-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Interventions focused on adolescents’ identity development have shown promising results, but questions remain as to which adolescents benefit most from them. This preregistered study examined how personality traits (Big Five domains and higher-order meta-traits) moderate adolescents’ responsiveness to the Identity Project, a school-based intervention supporting ethnic-racial identity development. A total of 509 adolescents from 22 classrooms in the southwestern regions of Sweden participated in an intervention and control group design (Mage = 16.28; SDage = 0.80; 66% female; 51% migration background). Results indicate that extraversion, a personality trait linked to socialization and external reward-seeking, as well as plasticity, a meta-trait linked to adaptability and exploration, both enhanced adolescents’ responsiveness to the intervention in terms of ethnic-racial identity exploration. Moderation differences were found between genders, but not between migration and non-migration backgrounds. With personality traits and meta-traits being revealed as predictors of intervention effectiveness, the study highlights how not all adolescents benefit equally from interventions targeting identity processes. By adapting interventions like the Identity Project to also reach the introverted or less plastic adolescents, it is possible to make them more inclusive, thus broadening their reach and impact.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence provides a single, high-level medium of communication for psychologists, psychiatrists, biologists, criminologists, educators, and researchers in many other allied disciplines who address the subject of youth and adolescence. The journal publishes quantitative analyses, theoretical papers, and comprehensive review articles. The journal especially welcomes empirically rigorous papers that take policy implications seriously. Research need not have been designed to address policy needs, but manuscripts must address implications for the manner society formally (e.g., through laws, policies or regulations) or informally (e.g., through parents, peers, and social institutions) responds to the period of youth and adolescence.